• 636
    • 86
    • We collect Jira Service Desk feedback from various sources, and we evaluate what we've collected when planning our product roadmap. To understand how this piece of feedback will be reviewed, see our Implementation of New Features Policy.

      NOTE: This suggestion is for JIRA Service Desk Server. Using JIRA Service Desk Cloud? See the corresponding suggestion.

      Atlassian Status as of January 13, 2021

      Hi all,

      I’m pleased to let you know that support for the request type ‘Project’ and ‘Version’ fields will be added in the upcoming JSM 4.15 release. Support for the ‘Group’ field is still outstanding, however this is something we might consider for our roadmap in the future. Please see JSDSERVER-7097 to add further comments and votes related to the 'Group' field.

      Charlie, JSM Server & Data Center Team

      Please specify what fields you would like to see in the Customer Portal by adding comments to this issue.

      Update as of 16 Aug 2016

      Hi all,
       
      Just to provide some update on this ticket. Currently JIRA Service Desk supports all custom fields except Group pickers, Project pickers and Version pickers. The Project one is not relevant to the portal's users – please let us know how you'd use it if it's relevant to you so that we can understand your use case. We haven't heard many customers asking for groups and versions and therefore they are not on our current roadmap. We'd like your use case for these ones, esp. the group field. 
       
      In terms of add-on fields from our partners, e.g. nFeed, this is something we would like to have in JSD in the future but are currently not on our short to medium term roadmap.
       
      — JIRA Service Desk team

      Update as of 13 March 2015

      Hi everyone,

      Thanks for your input! Reading the comments posted so far, these seem to be the common ones :

      • Group picker
      • Project picker
      • Labels
      • Multi level select
      • Calculated number

      Thanks for supporting JIRA Service Desk!

      The JIRA Service Desk team

          Form Name

            [JSDSERVER-86] Several custom field types can't be added to a request type

            Mitchell Ekins added a comment - - edited

            Support for Multi Level Cascading Select would be nice as well. (Having Multi Level Cascade Select in SD w/o a plugin at all would also be great, but that is for a different ticket)

             I am currently using the below for some selection lists which I cannot surface on my Customer Portal.

            https://marketplace.atlassian.com/apps/5008/multi-level-cascading-select?hosting=server&tab=overview 

             

            *Edit - Just noticed that Multi Level Select is already on the list, unsure if this is related?

             

            Mitchell Ekins added a comment - - edited Support for Multi Level Cascading Select would be nice as well. (Having Multi Level Cascade Select in SD w/o a plugin at all would also be great, but that is for a different ticket)  I am currently using the below for some selection lists which I cannot surface on my Customer Portal. https://marketplace.atlassian.com/apps/5008/multi-level-cascading-select?hosting=server&tab=overview     *Edit - Just noticed that Multi Level Select is already on the list, unsure if this is related?  

            I have a SD Server instance where a number of my Request types require changes to a specific project hence the need to display the Project Picker on the Customer Portal. 

            The alternative is to give the user a hand cranked single select list but as the project list grows this is an administrative overhead we don't need and will become unwieldy for the users as the list grows.  Please can we have the pickers visible and not 'hidden' to customers.

            Chris Evans added a comment - I have a SD Server instance where a number of my Request types require changes to a specific project hence the need to display the Project Picker on the Customer Portal.  The alternative is to give the user a hand cranked single select list but as the project list grows this is an administrative overhead we don't need and will become unwieldy for the users as the list grows.  Please can we have the pickers visible and not 'hidden' to customers.

            Majken Connor added a comment - - edited

            I use a Service Desk project to manage requests for changes to Atlassian tools. The SD project then becomes the change log for tracking changes to the suite - why was the project added? who wanted it? why is it using the schemes it's using? Or changes to access - why was x added to the project admin role? who approved it? Or to request a project be archived - when was it archived? who approved it?

            I would expose a project picker to users so they can indicate the project they are having trouble with/requesting changes to/asking to be archived. I would also expose it to them so that when they are requesting new projects they can indicate the project they'd like to share configuration with. I would also use it for tracking spaces that need to be linked to a Jira project.

            Majken Connor added a comment - - edited I use a Service Desk project to manage requests for changes to Atlassian tools. The SD project then becomes the change log for tracking changes to the suite - why was the project added? who wanted it? why is it using the schemes it's using? Or changes to access - why was x added to the project admin role? who approved it? Or to request a project be archived - when was it archived? who approved it? I would expose a project picker to users so they can indicate the project they are having trouble with/requesting changes to/asking to be archived. I would also expose it to them so that when they are requesting new projects they can indicate the project they'd like to share configuration with. I would also use it for tracking spaces that need to be linked to a Jira project.

            I absolutely need this the ability to have group pickers on the portal. I am using the Active directory Attribute sync plugin from Devinity https://marketplace.atlassian.com/apps/1212162/active-directory-attributes-sync?hosting=server&tab=overview

             

            I want to have a "request to be added to an AD group" request type on my service desk, where the submitter can pick a user, and group to add them to. After getting approvals, I would use the supplied post function to automatically add them to the group.

            If I dont have the group picker, I cant give the user an ability to search for a group.

            I was stunned to see that this wasn't available. Seems like a major missing feature that should be easy. If you can have user, pickers, why not group pickers.

             

            Andrew Laden added a comment - I absolutely need this the ability to have group pickers on the portal. I am using the Active directory Attribute sync plugin from Devinity https://marketplace.atlassian.com/apps/1212162/active-directory-attributes-sync?hosting=server&tab=overview   I want to have a "request to be added to an AD group" request type on my service desk, where the submitter can pick a user, and group to add them to. After getting approvals, I would use the supplied post function to automatically add them to the group. If I dont have the group picker, I cant give the user an ability to search for a group. I was stunned to see that this wasn't available. Seems like a major missing feature that should be easy. If you can have user, pickers, why not group pickers.  

            Use Case example for Project Picker:

            We are adapting the Service Desk not for customer use, but internal requests to our DevOps team. In order for the devops team to identify which project team is making the request, we need an easy drop down of the running projects that our teams can pick when putting forward said request. 

            Chris Fouda added a comment - Use Case example for Project Picker: We are adapting the Service Desk not for customer use, but internal requests to our DevOps team. In order for the devops team to identify which project team is making the request, we need an easy drop down of the running projects that our teams can pick when putting forward said request. 

            4.5 years later and this is still gathering interest? This is #1 on the votes with over 400 votes today. Over 150 comments as well...

             

            Please implement the ability for admins (the ones advocating for your product) to add what they need to the Customer Portal. A container field that allows admins to select which of the available issue fields they need to be present on the Portal would be fine.

            Richard Burstiner added a comment - 4.5 years later and this is still gathering interest? This is #1 on the votes with over 400 votes today. Over 150 comments as well...   Please implement the ability for admins (the ones advocating for your product) to add what they need to the Customer Portal. A container field that allows admins to select which of the available issue fields they need to be present on the Portal would be fine.

            Rick Tait added a comment -

            User Picker works on Service Desk, Group Picker should absolutely work as well.

            our instance of Jira Cloud service desk has internal groups and our customers want/need to be able to add a CC to those groups at ticket creation.

            please add this feature ASAP.

            i can't believe i need to even request such functionality. this is basic stuff.

            -RMT

            Rick Tait added a comment - User Picker works on Service Desk, Group Picker should absolutely work as well. our instance of Jira Cloud service desk has internal groups and our customers want/need to be able to add a CC to those groups at ticket creation. please add this feature ASAP. i can't believe i need to even request such functionality. this is basic stuff. -RMT

            +1 for calculated fields (those extending CalculatedCFType class). Txs!!

            Leirbag Assuab added a comment - +1 for calculated fields (those extending CalculatedCFType class). Txs!!

            Hi!

            Parent link from Jira Portfolio would be excellent. We have Initiatives in our customer portal, and we would like the users to create issue types on an initiative, i.e. they neet to enter a Parent Link!

             

            Thank you!

            Marina Veselić added a comment - Hi! Parent link from Jira Portfolio would be excellent. We have Initiatives in our customer portal, and we would like the users to create issue types on an initiative, i.e. they neet to enter a Parent Link!   Thank you!

            Riada's Insight for Jira has support for custom fields on Service Desk and will likely work for many needs.

            Deleted Account (Inactive) added a comment - Riada's Insight for Jira has support for custom fields on Service Desk and will likely work for many needs.

            Seriously Atlassian guys?

            This field type cannot be shown - you must provide a preset value

            You are facilitating the plugin business and the same time you are completely forgetting about customers satisfaction! Do something

             

            Mauricio GALVEZ added a comment - Seriously Atlassian guys? This field type cannot be shown - you must provide a preset value You are facilitating the plugin business and the same time you are completely forgetting about customers satisfaction! Do something  

            Bill Joe added a comment -

            For internal usage, project field is relevant field we would like to use.

            Bill Joe added a comment - For internal usage, project field is relevant field we would like to use.

            francis added a comment -

            <shameless plug>
            Hi Pedro,

            The multi-level cascading field of the table grid editor can be used on a customer portal. (Note the table grid itself not yet - but we are working towards that goal)

            Francis
            </shameless plug>

            francis added a comment - <shameless plug> Hi Pedro, The multi-level cascading field of the table grid editor can be used on a customer portal. (Note the table grid itself not yet - but we are working towards that goal) Francis </shameless plug>

            Multi-Level Cascading Select by Sourcesense, please.

            Pedro Tavares added a comment - Multi-Level Cascading Select by Sourcesense, please.

            Adobe's use Case - which I think will be relevant to ANY team supporting Jira that wishes to use JSD.

            Our Jira customers submit Jira support requests to us. Requests to create/manage fields, workflows, screens, etc. You know, the day-to-day. Well on our intake form we include the Project Picker field to allow the user to specify which Jira project they would like these changes to apply to. This works really well for us and maintains a great level of traceability. 

            This is blocking our Jira Support Team from using the very tool they support themselves. It's ironic, really. Simple use case, and certainly not hard to see it's value. It's also not hard to see how it is negatively impacting our adoption and proliferation of JSD throughout Adobe. 

            Dom Baldin [Adobe] added a comment - Adobe's use Case - which I think will be relevant to  ANY  team supporting Jira that wishes to use JSD. Our Jira customers submit Jira support requests to us. Requests to create/manage fields, workflows, screens, etc. You know, the day-to-day. Well on our intake form we include the  Project Picker  field to allow the user to specify which Jira project they would like these changes to apply to. This works really well for us and maintains a great level of traceability.  This is blocking our  Jira Support Team  from using the very tool they support themselves. It's ironic, really. Simple use case, and certainly not hard to see it's value. It's also not hard to see how it is negatively impacting our adoption and proliferation of JSD throughout  Adobe.  

            We really want to run "Internal service desks" at enterprise level. One development team delivering a portal logged issue with help text to another remote development team so it can be triaged and managed etc.

            Without the customer version picker, we are struggling. We need to complete a "Last known good" and do not want to use a manual select as they are on CI and the upkeep would be untenable. is there any scope to add version picker to portals?

            Averil Franklin added a comment - We really want to run "Internal service desks" at enterprise level. One development team delivering a portal logged issue with help text to another remote development team so it can be triaged and managed etc. Without the customer version picker, we are struggling. We need to complete a "Last known good" and do not want to use a manual select as they are on CI and the upkeep would be untenable. is there any scope to add version picker to portals?

            I agree with Steven....

            "Often I need to use Groups for approvals, notifications. Again, not supported at all. This seems obvious. I need to be able to provide a list of groups so that a customer may select the owner, department, group, etc."

            This issue was created 4 years ago, and one update from Atlassian on 13 March 2015 - this is really limiting.  Please advise on when this will be updated?

            Lisa Schaffer added a comment - I agree with Steven.... "Often I need to use Groups for approvals, notifications. Again, not supported at all. This seems obvious. I need to be able to provide a list of groups so that a customer may select the owner, department, group, etc." This issue was created 4 years ago, and one update from Atlassian on  13 March 2015  - this is really limiting.  Please advise on when this will be updated?

            Saulius added a comment -

            Needed feature and solution for it cause predefined fields do not fit needs. Very important cause such information that could be added to usual Edit/view screen MUST HAVE possibility to be shown on Customer portal as well. 

            Saulius added a comment - Needed feature and solution for it cause predefined fields do not fit needs. Very important cause such information that could be added to usual Edit/view screen MUST HAVE possibility to be shown on Customer portal as well. 

            I need this issue to be solved too, specially for group picker!

            Maro Hamamjyan added a comment - I need this issue to be solved too, specially for group picker!

            kishan.kanhaiya added a comment - - edited

            I am trying to use "Multi-Level Cascading Select" in JIRA Service Desk(3.5) customer Portal but unable to add that custom field in Customer Portal. It is not letting me to add it to visible field and keep asking to set the default value unless I have set the value already.

            Does anyone knows when this add-on will be compatible to Customer portal?

             

            Thanks,

            Kishan

            kishan.kanhaiya added a comment - - edited I am trying to use "Multi-Level Cascading Select" in JIRA Service Desk(3.5) customer Portal but unable to add that custom field in Customer Portal. It is not letting me to add it to visible field and keep asking to set the default value unless I have set the value already. Does anyone knows when this add-on will be compatible to Customer portal?   Thanks, Kishan

            Hi Team,

            I am not able to add "checklist"(this field is created by using Checklist plugin) field in request type

            while adding, I am getting "This field type cannot be shown - you must provide a preset value" but after clicking on "edit Value" i keep on getting loading kind of page.

            So kindly confirm what are the fields type supported by JIRA service desk 3.5 version and which are not supported and any future plan when it will be implemented. 

            Thanks,

            Bavant

            Balvant Biradar added a comment - Hi Team, I am not able to add "checklist"(this field is created by using Checklist plugin) field in request type while adding, I am getting "This field type cannot be shown - you must provide a preset value" but after clicking on " edit Value" i keep on getting loading kind of page. So kindly confirm what are the fields type supported by JIRA service desk 3.5 version and which are not supported and any future plan when it will be implemented.  Thanks, Bavant

            Many of the Service Desk's I set up desire the customer to refer to a previous support request: There's zero support for this since you didn't provide the Issue Links field for the portal and plugin fields of the same type don't work. Since Atlassian hasn't provided this, my only option is to insert JS into the portal and handle it all myself. Painful at best.

            Often I need to use Groups for approvals, notifications. Again, not supported at all. This seems obvious. I need to be able to provide a list of groups so that a customer may select the owner, department, group, etc. Right now, I only accomplish this by scheduling a job that reaches out to LDAP and updates options in a normal dropdown menu. This sucks. Badly.

            We use Service Desk internally to manage support for our many, large, JIRA instances. Not having access to the normal Project Picker is dumb. Yet another field I need to dump a ton of time into since Service Desk decided to whitelist specific types of fields and re-render them.

            Stop arbitrarily limiting what fields I can add to Service Desk Portal and Software Boards! 

            Steven F Behnke added a comment - Many of the Service Desk's I set up desire the customer to refer to a previous support request: There's zero support for this since you didn't provide the Issue Links field for the portal and plugin fields of the same type don't work. Since Atlassian hasn't provided this, my only option is to insert JS into the portal and handle it all myself. Painful at  best . Often I need to use Groups for approvals, notifications. Again, not supported at all. This seems obvious. I need to be able to provide a list of groups so that a customer may select the owner, department, group, etc. Right now, I only accomplish this by scheduling a job that reaches out to LDAP and updates options in a normal dropdown menu. This sucks. Badly. We use Service Desk internally to manage support for our many, large, JIRA instances. Not having access to the normal Project Picker is dumb. Yet another field I need to dump a ton of time into since Service Desk decided to whitelist specific types of fields and re-render them. Stop arbitrarily limiting what fields I can add to Service Desk Portal and Software Boards! 

            I really need the ability to link a JIRA ticket to my internal customer support portal. Looks like its not pssible. Can someone address this please?

            Vasanth Venkatachari added a comment - I really need the ability to link a JIRA ticket to my internal customer support portal. Looks like its not pssible. Can someone address this please?

            Hi,

             

            I really need project picker in service desk, because when i receive a request to create a Bitbucket repository i have to assosiate the JIRA existing project; so i don't wanna the user capy and paste everytime the project name, but use a project list.

             

            please update this issue

            thank you

            Lorenzo Porta added a comment - Hi,   I really need project picker in service desk, because when i receive a request to create a Bitbucket repository i have to assosiate the JIRA existing project; so i don't wanna the user capy and paste everytime the project name, but use a project list.   please update this issue thank you

            Hello.
            I can't find Multiple value customfield support.

            Better is enable ability to insert custom html that can format customfield values or get that code from customfield plugin.

            Александр Верзаков added a comment - Hello. I can't find Multiple value customfield support. Better is enable ability to insert custom html that can format customfield values or get that code from customfield plugin.

            Please specify what fields you would like to see in the Customer Portal by adding comments to this issue.

            We would like to add a our own(custom implementation) customfield type to customer portal. Custom field type is implemented for specific needs.

            So, we would like to have ability to add any custom field type to customer portal.

            But, for developers, there isn't any Public API/SPI to do that.

            Miroslav Kravec added a comment - Please specify what fields you would like to see in the Customer Portal by adding comments to this issue. We would like to add a our own(custom implementation) customfield type to customer portal. Custom field type is implemented for specific needs. So, we would like to have ability to add any custom field type to customer portal . But, for developers, there isn't any Public API/SPI to do that.

            Hello Anupam Srivastava,

            With nFeed you can populate custom fields with data coming from external datasources, including user directories. It should be able to answer your need and it is compatible with JIRA Service Desk .

            Christophe Promé added a comment - Hello Anupam Srivastava, With nFeed you can populate custom fields with data coming from external datasources, including user directories. It should be able to answer your need and it is compatible with JIRA Service Desk .

            Anupam Srivastava added a comment - - edited

            Please also add support for Kepler Custom Fields PRO or provide functionality to pull external AD Users and Groups into custom fields....This would really help our use case and enable us to promote the adoption of service desk at an organization level...

            We intended to use this custom field to help eliminate the need to verify information relating to a user account.

            As an example, take a user that would like to modify their user account information. By providing a custom field connected directly with our AD the user can simply select the appropriate user to be modified. If there are 2 Lisa Smiths...they would select the correct Lisa Smith account.
            In order to work around this limitation that we have just discovered, we will now simply present a text box for the user to enter their user account. This could result in getting the log in user name or the users full name and even spelling mistakes. This will now impact the service agent who will have to verify the exact AD account with the customer before sending the task to the implementing team. This is an extra step that would be unnecessary if we had the custom field.

            We also wanted to dynamically pull in our department & branch listing's from AD which are centrally managed to be displayed and selected so we are not managing a separate listing of static information.

            There were various other custom fields we wanted to create as well pulling from AD that we will now only be able to present a text box requiring service agent effort to validate prior to sending tasks to our implementing teams.

            I hope that this can be addressed in the near future to support us rolling this out further...

            Anupam Srivastava added a comment - - edited Please also add support for Kepler Custom Fields PRO or provide functionality to pull external AD Users and Groups into custom fields....This would really help our use case and enable us to promote the adoption of service desk at an organization level... We intended to use this custom field to help eliminate the need to verify information relating to a user account. As an example, take a user that would like to modify their user account information. By providing a custom field connected directly with our AD the user can simply select the appropriate user to be modified. If there are 2 Lisa Smiths...they would select the correct Lisa Smith account. In order to work around this limitation that we have just discovered, we will now simply present a text box for the user to enter their user account. This could result in getting the log in user name or the users full name and even spelling mistakes. This will now impact the service agent who will have to verify the exact AD account with the customer before sending the task to the implementing team. This is an extra step that would be unnecessary if we had the custom field. We also wanted to dynamically pull in our department & branch listing's from AD which are centrally managed to be displayed and selected so we are not managing a separate listing of static information. There were various other custom fields we wanted to create as well pulling from AD that we will now only be able to present a text box requiring service agent effort to validate prior to sending tasks to our implementing teams. I hope that this can be addressed in the near future to support us rolling this out further...

            Max Deland added a comment -

            We have about 800 JIRA projects to support. We use 1 Service Desk portal to receive all kinds of support request for these projects. It would be more than useful for the user to use the "Project Picker"  and choose on which project he needs support. It would also ease our support management and reporting. 

            Max Deland added a comment - We have about 800 JIRA projects to support. We use 1 Service Desk portal to receive all kinds of support request for these projects. It would be more than useful for the user to use the " Project Picker "  and choose on which project he needs support. It would also ease our support management and reporting. 

            wtf, no Group Picker support??

            Brian Franzen added a comment - wtf, no Group Picker support??

            RE: Update as of 16 Aug 2016

            Many of our workflows are initially assigned to teams (which we have sorted into groups).  As groups cannot be added as 'Assignee' we have created a Group Picker field into which the user creating the request would 'assign' the group.

            Without the ability to add this custom Group Picker field to the Service Desk for the user to select the initial assignment of a team to the request, Service Desk becomes unusable, as we are then left with orphan issues (no assignee no assigned group).  Potential work arounds, such as adding a loop transition to the first status of the workflow to set the team, would require exposing JIRA to our service desk customers and is not a valid option.  Creating a catch all team for initial assignment or an individual to filter requests also becomes cumbersome and not a valid option.

            Hopefully we are not the only ones that assign to Teams on initial create based on user selection and we look forward to the Group Picker field being a valid addition to the Service Desk interface.

             

            James Kosiba added a comment - RE: Update as of 16 Aug 2016 Many of our workflows are initially assigned to teams (which we have sorted into groups).  As groups cannot be added as 'Assignee' we have created a Group Picker field into which the user creating the request would 'assign' the group. Without the ability to add this custom Group Picker field to the Service Desk for the user to select the initial assignment of a team to the request, Service Desk becomes unusable, as we are then left with orphan issues (no assignee no assigned group).  Potential work arounds, such as adding a loop transition to the first status of the workflow to set the team, would require exposing JIRA to our service desk customers and is not a valid option.  Creating a catch all team for initial assignment or an individual to filter requests also becomes cumbersome and not a valid option. Hopefully we are not the only ones that assign to Teams on initial create based on user selection and we look forward to the Group Picker field being a valid addition to the Service Desk interface.  

            francis added a comment -

            @lucas.dussurget

            Now you made us very curious - how did you guys pull it off ?

             

            Francis

             

             

            francis added a comment - @lucas.dussurget Now you made us very curious - how did you guys pull it off ?   Francis    

            Thank you guys! We are super pumped on this. 

             

             

            Cameron Birdwell added a comment - Thank you guys! We are super pumped on this.     

            Hi there,

            I saw many of you asked to be able to use nFeed feeds on the JSD portal.

            We've just released nFeed 5.9 today which finally makes this possible.

            See more on the Marketplace and in our documentation

            Lucas Dussurget [Valiantys] added a comment - Hi there, I saw many of you asked to be able to use nFeed feeds on the JSD portal. We've just released nFeed 5.9 today which finally makes this possible. See more on the Marketplace  and in our documentation

            Hi, there.

            It is very critical to me to have Scripted Fields and Behaviours in Customer Portal. 

            Alexander Demchenko added a comment - Hi, there. It is very critical to me to have Scripted Fields and Behaviours in Customer Portal. 

            +1 for adding the version pickers on request types. I have different clients on different versions of our software and in some cases they are in the process of going through an upgrade and need to ability to specify which version of our software they are running.

             

            I do have a current workaround but, it seems redundant. Create a generic select list and populate with the project's versions. You end up having to maintain the versions in 2 places but, its what I am able to do at the moment to give my customers and agents what they need.

            Stephen Crandell added a comment - +1 for adding the version pickers on request types. I have different clients on different versions of our software and in some cases they are in the process of going through an upgrade and need to ability to specify which version of our software they are running.   I do have a current workaround but, it seems redundant. Create a generic select list and populate with the project's versions. You end up having to maintain the versions in 2 places but, its what I am able to do at the moment to give my customers and agents what they need.

            +1 : we need to be able to use all types of custom fields (not only nfeed ones). I completely aggree with Jan : we need a way to integrate new type of custom fields into Service Desk the same way it is possible to do it in basic JIRA server.

            Guillaume _Apwide_ added a comment - +1 : we need to be able to use all types of custom fields (not only nfeed ones). I completely aggree with Jan : we need a way to integrate new type of custom fields into Service Desk the same way it is possible to do it in basic JIRA server.

            We desperately need nfeed on our customer portal. Please Atlassian, work on this. It will enhance JIRA's capabilities massively!

            Charles Szmagara added a comment - We desperately need nfeed on our customer portal. Please Atlassian, work on this. It will enhance JIRA's capabilities massively!

            +1 to adding support for third party data plugins like nFeed. I am disappointed this is not on the roadmap.

            Jeff Yantha added a comment - +1 to adding support for third party data plugins like nFeed. I am disappointed this is not on the roadmap.

            I don't get that too. Why you do not publish development api to enable us to develop field that is possible to use in customer portal? What is the issue there? I understand, that it probably uses different layout for field in customer portal then in jira itself, but what else is blocking us? I belive you should reconsider your roadmap while this is must have feature, not just nice to to have one.

            Jan Prokeš added a comment - I don't get that too. Why you do not publish development api to enable us to develop field that is possible to use in customer portal? What is the issue there? I understand, that it probably uses different layout for field in customer portal then in jira itself, but what else is blocking us? I belive you should reconsider your roadmap while this is must have feature, not just nice to to have one.

            Hugh Hiers added a comment -

            "In terms of add-on fields from our partners, e.g. nFeed, this is something we would like to have in JSD in the future but are currently not on our short to medium term roadmap." -JSD

            Are you kidding me?  Really, I understand you need to prioritize your feature requests, but what other feature is more important than this one???

            I love JIRA.  It's a great product.  But it's a product that benefits from add-ons to fill in the gaps.  We've invested in add-ons to support custom fields to get business done.  Not being able to use those on the customer portal has left me telling my customers "I hope we can do that in the near future..." for the past year.  I wish you would re-evaluate getting this feature implemented sooner rather than later.  It would help us (and I'm sure others) make our Service Desk portals AWESOME!

            Hugh Hiers added a comment - "In terms of add-on fields from our partners, e.g. nFeed, this is something we would like to have in JSD in the future but are currently not on our short to medium term roadmap." -JSD Are you kidding me?  Really, I understand you need to prioritize your feature requests, but what other feature is more important than this one??? I love JIRA.  It's a great product.  But it's a product that benefits from add-ons to fill in the gaps.  We've invested in add-ons to support custom fields to get business done.  Not being able to use those on the customer portal has left me telling my customers "I hope we can do that in the near future..." for the past year.  I wish you would re-evaluate getting this feature implemented sooner rather than later.  It would help us (and I'm sure others) make our Service Desk portals AWESOME!

            We're in a process of introducing a service desk software for our non-IT service teams. For them it is vital to have the customer pick / select a certain value from a nFeed custom database field. Not being able to do so, is a major stopper for using JSD in our company.

            So please rethink the short/medium term decision to not support 3rd party addon custom fields.

            Jan-Peter Rusch added a comment - We're in a process of introducing a service desk software for our non-IT service teams. For them it is vital to have the customer pick / select a certain value from a nFeed custom database field. Not being able to do so, is a major stopper for using JSD in our company. So please rethink the short/medium term decision to not support 3rd party addon custom fields.

            Please add Version Pickers to those to be included.

            We support multiple versions of our software and require JIRA Service Desk to support Version Pickers so that customers can advise the version they are raising a ticket against. Currently we have had to create a custom drop down picker and populate it with our versions so that customers can select. This really undermines the JIRA version functionality and I'm surprised it wasn't implemented out of the box.

            Ralfe Collie added a comment - Please add Version Pickers to those to be included. We support multiple versions of our software and require JIRA Service Desk to support Version Pickers so that customers can advise the version they are raising a ticket against. Currently we have had to create a custom drop down picker and populate it with our versions so that customers can select. This really undermines the JIRA version functionality and I'm surprised it wasn't implemented out of the box.

            Are there any plans to allow 3rd party Fields to be used in the Customer Portal. If not is there any plans to allow a multi-leveled Cascading field (single select) in the works.

            ability to use one field to control
            SITE>Product>Component>Common Problems

            With Varying information at each would be crucial.

            Thanks.

            Mitchell Terry added a comment - Are there any plans to allow 3rd party Fields to be used in the Customer Portal. If not is there any plans to allow a multi-leveled Cascading field (single select) in the works. ability to use one field to control SITE>Product>Component>Common Problems With Varying information at each would be crucial. Thanks.

            + Multi group picker
            We using Service Desk for IT management, sometimes automation.

            Example: A newcomer needs some basic groups, and some special group depending on his role. These groups needs to be selected from the AD group picker. (Right now these information are written to the description).

            Best:
            Peter

            Peter Cselotei - Lupus Consulting Zrt. added a comment - + Multi group picker We using Service Desk for IT management, sometimes automation. Example: A newcomer needs some basic groups, and some special group depending on his role. These groups needs to be selected from the AD group picker. (Right now these information are written to the description). Best: Peter

            We're in precisely the same boat as Cameron Birdwell. Our group management is necessarily in Active Directory, and JIRA is great for its ability to read and use that information. Having it missing from Service Desk Customer Portals is very frustrating! (i.e. Users who want to subscribe to a Distribution Group, be granted access to a department's network share or SharePoint, etc.)

            Deleted Account (Inactive) added a comment - We're in precisely the same boat as Cameron Birdwell. Our group management is necessarily in Active Directory, and JIRA is great for its ability to read and use that information. Having it missing from Service Desk Customer Portals is very frustrating! (i.e. Users who want to subscribe to a Distribution Group, be granted access to a department's network share or SharePoint, etc.)

            We are using service desk for our infrastructure project which provide access to file shares, vm's, and many other things controlled by groups. These groups come all the way from AD. We would like to be able to let the user pick from the available groups to who should be able to access, R/W, or R/O.

            Also, we allow the creation of Stash project through our JIRA project (we have to approve and check config of course) and we allow them to select which groups should be able to R/O or R/W to that Stash project. Since I can't put the group field in service desk it keeps my whole project out of service desk (along with no nFeed)

            Cameron Birdwell added a comment - We are using service desk for our infrastructure project which provide access to file shares, vm's, and many other things controlled by groups. These groups come all the way from AD. We would like to be able to let the user pick from the available groups to who should be able to access, R/W, or R/O. Also, we allow the creation of Stash project through our JIRA project (we have to approve and check config of course) and we allow them to select which groups should be able to R/O or R/W to that Stash project. Since I can't put the group field in service desk it keeps my whole project out of service desk (along with no nFeed)

            vwong added a comment -

            Hi all,

            Just to provide some update on this ticket. Currently JIRA Service Desk supports all custom fields except Group pickers, Project pickers and Version pickers. The Project one is not relevant to the portal's users – please let us know how you'd use it if it's relevant to you so that we can understand your use case. We haven't heard many customers asking for groups and versions and therefore they are not on our current roadmap. We'd like your use case for these ones, esp. the group field.

            In terms of add-on fields from our partners, e.g. nFeed, this is something we would like to have in JSD in the future but are currently not on our short to medium term roadmap.

            — JIRA Service Desk team

            vwong added a comment - Hi all, Just to provide some update on this ticket. Currently JIRA Service Desk supports all custom fields except Group pickers, Project pickers and Version pickers. The Project one is not relevant to the portal's users – please let us know how you'd use it if it's relevant to you so that we can understand your use case. We haven't heard many customers asking for groups and versions and therefore they are not on our current roadmap. We'd like your use case for these ones, esp. the group field. In terms of add-on fields from our partners, e.g. nFeed, this is something we would like to have in JSD in the future but are currently not on our short to medium term roadmap. — JIRA Service Desk team

            Multi-Group Picker +1

            Deleted Account (Inactive) added a comment - Multi-Group Picker +1

            multi-group picker!

            Rose Sahagun added a comment - multi-group picker!

            Kepler Database custom fields. Actually, any database-connected custom fields and the like, NFeed or Kepler doesn't matter.
            It's really disappointing to find out after creating elaborate system using db custom fields that Service Desk breaks them all.

            Mariia Zemtsova added a comment - Kepler Database custom fields. Actually, any database-connected custom fields and the like, NFeed or Kepler doesn't matter. It's really disappointing to find out after creating elaborate system using db custom fields that Service Desk breaks them all.

            Version picker!

            Mark Bednarski added a comment - Version picker!

            date fields +1

            Christopher Mohr added a comment - date fields +1

            nFeed +1

            Multiple user picker

            J. Patrick Giurintano added a comment - Multiple user picker

            Message Custom Field

            Daniel Richards added a comment - Message Custom Field

            TechTimeS added a comment -

            +1 for Multi-Level Cascading Select

            TechTimeS added a comment - +1 for Multi-Level Cascading Select

            Ross Brown added a comment -

            nFeed +1

            Ross Brown added a comment - nFeed +1

            Table grid editor

            Brian Taylor added a comment - Table grid editor

            Nfeed +1

            Henrik Mikkelsen added a comment - Nfeed +1

            BrandonS added a comment -

            Please,

            -Tables for JIRA (by E7 Solutions)

            -nFeed

            -any 3rd party custom field

            .
            Thank you very much,

            BrandonS added a comment - Please, -Tables for JIRA (by E7 Solutions) -nFeed -any 3rd party custom field . Thank you very much,

            I also believe the NFEED support is a must, along with other custom fields.

            Doug Morato added a comment - I also believe the NFEED support is a must, along with other custom fields.

            pierre.gourven_ssii435493598 added a comment -

            NFEED support is a must except if there is an other way to feed list fields dynamically calling a webservice, a database or a LDAP.
            This request is common and asked by customers.

            Thanks

            Pierre

            pierre.gourven_ssii435493598 added a comment - NFEED support is a must except if there is an other way to feed list fields dynamically calling a webservice, a database or a LDAP. This request is common and asked by customers. Thanks Pierre

            I looking for Nfeed type of fields for integration with JSD.

            Thanks,
            Sumit

            Sumit Kumar added a comment - I looking for Nfeed type of fields for integration with JSD. Thanks, Sumit

            A custom field type with the ability to create multiple levels would be great. We are actually unable to move forward on a cloud implementation of the product because of this lack of functionality. By this I mean dropdown 1 has choices A, B, and C, and dropdown two displays only choices A1, A2, and A3 if A was selected in dropdown 1, B1, B2 and B3 if B is selected, etc.

            Jason Sanford added a comment - A custom field type with the ability to create multiple levels would be great. We are actually unable to move forward on a cloud implementation of the product because of this lack of functionality. By this I mean dropdown 1 has choices A, B, and C, and dropdown two displays only choices A1, A2, and A3 if A was selected in dropdown 1, B1, B2 and B3 if B is selected, etc.

            Pierre-Éric Marez added a comment - - edited

            Also interested by nFeed implementation!

            Pierre-Éric Marez added a comment - - edited Also interested by nFeed implementation!

            FixVersion for sure should be there

            Ivan Karpov added a comment - FixVersion for sure should be there

            erna: There is no timeframe attached to the TODO tickets. The TODO tickets are actually Feature Requests towards Atlassian, and Atlassian has its own will. Even tickets with 500+ votes are left open for years without any comment from them.

            Open vStorage added a comment - erna : There is no timeframe attached to the TODO tickets. The TODO tickets are actually Feature Requests towards Atlassian, and Atlassian has its own will. Even tickets with 500+ votes are left open for years without any comment from them.

            +1 to nFeed

            Jónheiður Ísleifsdóttir added a comment - +1 to nFeed

            We need cascading select and single select in the customer portal.

            Honeywell JIRA Admin added a comment - We need cascading select and single select in the customer portal.

            Mike Lind added a comment -

            It cannot. We use it, but we can't use Customer portal because of this.

            Mike Lind added a comment - It cannot. We use it, but we can't use Customer portal because of this.

            Can someone confirm if "Database custom field" be displayed in Customer portal?

            https://marketplace.atlassian.com/plugins/com.keplerrominfo.jira.plugins.databasecf/server/overview

            Thanks in advance

            Vinay Shekar added a comment - Can someone confirm if "Database custom field" be displayed in Customer portal? https://marketplace.atlassian.com/plugins/com.keplerrominfo.jira.plugins.databasecf/server/overview Thanks in advance

            Rich added a comment - - edited

            I have found that the Tempo Timesheets Plugin "Account" field is not currently supported. I would like to see this made available.

            As an aside, this is also not working when added to a JIRA Software issue type/screen AND then used with Zendesk integration where Zendesk pops the screen. I have reported to Zendesk also.

            Rich added a comment - - edited I have found that the Tempo Timesheets Plugin "Account" field is not currently supported. I would like to see this made available. As an aside, this is also not working when added to a JIRA Software issue type/screen AND then used with Zendesk integration where Zendesk pops the screen. I have reported to Zendesk also.

            +1 to nFeed

            Eduardo Guzman added a comment - +1 to nFeed

            mcreenan added a comment -

            It looks like cascade select is working on cloud now.

            Any word on what version of server this will be available?

            mcreenan added a comment - It looks like cascade select is working on cloud now. Any word on what version of server this will be available?

            Version pickers please

            Seve Ponce de Leon added a comment - Version pickers please

            Single autofill issue picker

            Jan Cornelissen added a comment - Single autofill issue picker

            Oliviu Nita added a comment - - edited

            +9999 Customer request type Not needed on Customer Portal, i need it when i create a ticket on BackOffice...

            Oliviu Nita added a comment - - edited +9999 Customer request type Not needed on Customer Portal, i need it when i create a ticket on BackOffice...

            Sergiy added a comment -

            +1 to nFeed

            Sergiy added a comment - +1 to nFeed

            Cascade Select seems to still be an issue in v3. When can we have this feature?

            William Penman added a comment - Cascade Select seems to still be an issue in v3. When can we have this feature?

            +1 Multi Cascade Select
            +1 Calculated number

            Julia Drygas added a comment - +1 Multi Cascade Select +1 Calculated number

            + Table Grid

            Flavio Beck added a comment - + Table Grid

            Macca added a comment -

            Valiantys nFeed please

            Macca added a comment - Valiantys nFeed please

            +1 Multi Cascade Select

            William Penman added a comment - +1 Multi Cascade Select

            Version selector should be nice!

            Andre van Rossem added a comment - Version selector should be nice!

            Need Versions to be available.

            Richard Cullen added a comment - Need Versions to be available.

            Any custom fields related to the Kepler ROM add-ons.

            Hugh Hiers added a comment - Any custom fields related to the Kepler ROM add-ons.

            +1 for multi level cascade select. Are there any plans for a release?

            Marco Baldelli added a comment - +1 for multi level cascade select. Are there any plans for a release?

            This "Suggestion" issue should really be set to something like: "Requirements - Bug". Come on, did they really intend to design JSD with a restrictive set of JIRA Issue functionality/compatibility?

            Application Services added a comment - This "Suggestion" issue should really be set to something like: "Requirements - Bug" . Come on, did they really intend to design JSD with a restrictive set of JIRA Issue functionality/compatibility?

            +1 for nFeed

            Yaroslav Langer added a comment - +1 for nFeed

            BenP added a comment - - edited

            Please add to the list: Fields that expose Project Version

            • system fields Affects/Fix Version never show up in the field list
            • when defined as custom fields, the field shows up in the portal request type fields screen, but is only allowed as invisible ("This field type cannot be shown - you must provide a preset value")

            Going by https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/JSD-1650, this seemed to be possible (though buggy) at one point.

            Context

            I'd like to communicate to our customers when a change will be delivered, using FixVersion
            e.g. in UAT, some issues are qualified as change requests for post-go live.. we use JIRA Project Version to indicate this (e.g. issue.fixVersion = 'PGL')

            Now i'll need to define yet another custom field to capture the same

            BenP added a comment - - edited Please add to the list: Fields that expose Project Version system fields Affects/Fix Version never show up in the field list when defined as custom fields, the field shows up in the portal request type fields screen, but is only allowed as invisible ("This field type cannot be shown - you must provide a preset value") Going by https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/JSD-1650 , this seemed to be possible (though buggy) at one point. Context I'd like to communicate to our customers when a change will be delivered, using FixVersion e.g. in UAT, some issues are qualified as change requests for post-go live.. we use JIRA Project Version to indicate this (e.g. issue.fixVersion = 'PGL') Now i'll need to define yet another custom field to capture the same

            For my organization it is also a need to have a custom field to be visible in Customer Portal. The field we need is the component field.

            Is there a planning in which release will this be available?

            Thijs Bakker added a comment - For my organization it is also a need to have a custom field to be visible in Customer Portal. The field we need is the component field. Is there a planning in which release will this be available?

            We definitely need this feature. As a matter of fact, all fields that works in JIRA should work in JSD, it's a plugin to JIRA. I understand all the problematics around getting that to work, but you're going to fix this please fix this the right way.

            Adding a few custom fields types to the list of "accepted" fields just won't cut it, since you'll have another issue opened 2 days after requesting for more, so please just fix this once and for all, and make all custom fields works in JSD, no matter the type (even from marketplace Addons).

            Thanks,

            Ludia Administrator added a comment - We definitely need this feature. As a matter of fact, all fields that works in JIRA should work in JSD, it's a plugin to JIRA. I understand all the problematics around getting that to work, but you're going to fix this please fix this the right way. Adding a few custom fields types to the list of "accepted" fields just won't cut it, since you'll have another issue opened 2 days after requesting for more, so please just fix this once and for all, and make all custom fields works in JSD, no matter the type (even from marketplace Addons). Thanks,

            Hugh Hiers added a comment - - edited

            This is an interesting plugin. I'm not surprised it works on the customer portal since it's simply creating a JIRA-baseline option list for you. My problem is that there's no way to run dynamic options on the portal. For instance, the Kepler database value custom field allows you to use fields like "reporter" in your query. So we have the ability to show the customer a list specific to them (e.g. hardware they own). But right now that only works for technicians on the customer portal (i.e. jira users).

            Hugh Hiers added a comment - - edited This is an interesting plugin. I'm not surprised it works on the customer portal since it's simply creating a JIRA-baseline option list for you. My problem is that there's no way to run dynamic options on the portal. For instance, the Kepler database value custom field allows you to use fields like "reporter" in your query. So we have the ability to show the customer a list specific to them (e.g. hardware they own). But right now that only works for technicians on the customer portal (i.e. jira users).

            We swiched to the "Custom Field Option Synchronizier" Plugin:
            https://marketplace.atlassian.com/plugins/ch.bitvoodoo.jira.plugins.customfieldsync
            Til now we have over 30 CFs with synced options, some of the CFs have even several thousands of options.
            Works like a charm for us.

            Philipp Klauser added a comment - We swiched to the "Custom Field Option Synchronizier" Plugin: https://marketplace.atlassian.com/plugins/ch.bitvoodoo.jira.plugins.customfieldsync Til now we have over 30 CFs with synced options, some of the CFs have even several thousands of options. Works like a charm for us.

            Anon Amas added a comment -

            We are also developing a Service Desk and having the same issue. I am using the Query Issue Linker plugin field to pull a list of application from our CI "Configuration Items" project, so that the person logging a software issue can select the software they are having issue with. We can then use that information to route the incident or SR though to the correct queue so that the right team can respond to the issue.

            Without this we would have to create a manually updated drop down list for each item of software we have. (double up of work). We would like our config management project to be the single source of the truth.

            Anon Amas added a comment - We are also developing a Service Desk and having the same issue. I am using the Query Issue Linker plugin field to pull a list of application from our CI "Configuration Items" project, so that the person logging a software issue can select the software they are having issue with. We can then use that information to route the incident or SR though to the correct queue so that the right team can respond to the issue. Without this we would have to create a manually updated drop down list for each item of software we have. (double up of work). We would like our config management project to be the single source of the truth.

            Hugh Hiers added a comment -

            We are currently developing Service Desk to launch in the August time frame. It was a shocker to see that advanced custom fields don't work on the customer portal for users in the customer list when they work perfectly well for jira users. This will mean a huge downsizing of plans to automate processes right from the customer point of use.

            We are using the Kepler plugins and in particular the database custom fields.

            Hugh Hiers added a comment - We are currently developing Service Desk to launch in the August time frame. It was a shocker to see that advanced custom fields don't work on the customer portal for users in the customer list when they work perfectly well for jira users. This will mean a huge downsizing of plans to automate processes right from the customer point of use. We are using the Kepler plugins and in particular the database custom fields.

            JIRA option: Add Custom Field -> Advanced -> JSON Request Custom Field (with the description: Feed select list option using http via JSON). Is the custom field type mentioned by Oliviu.

            Matthew McMahon (Inactive) added a comment - JIRA option: Add Custom Field -> Advanced -> JSON Request Custom Field (with the description: Feed select list option using http via JSON). Is the custom field type mentioned by Oliviu.

            Mark Scheepers added a comment - - edited

            The link from previous comment suggests to a a single choice select list for this moment.

            I have added such custom field and this is still not returned in JIRA service desk. Is there a way to workaround this?

            In addition I tested I have tested with checkboxes; select list (multiple choice); select list (single choice) and all field types are not visible in JIRA service desk customer portal

            After configuring the fields on the screens automatically generated by service desk the fields are visible for me

            Mark Scheepers added a comment - - edited The link from previous comment suggests to a a single choice select list for this moment. I have added such custom field and this is still not returned in JIRA service desk. Is there a way to workaround this? In addition I tested I have tested with checkboxes ; select list (multiple choice) ; select list (single choice) and all field types are not visible in JIRA service desk customer portal After configuring the fields on the screens automatically generated by service desk the fields are visible for me

            I was advised by Matthew McMahon [Atlassian] to add my requirements here.
            Please see: https://answers.atlassian.com/questions/17434154/answers/17440476?flashId=1379308788
            If not appropriate let me know.

            Cheers.

            Oliviu Nita added a comment - I was advised by Matthew McMahon [Atlassian] to add my requirements here. Please see: https://answers.atlassian.com/questions/17434154/answers/17440476?flashId=1379308788 If not appropriate let me know. Cheers.

            Is there a timeline when custom fields will become available in JIRA service desk request types?

            We are currently setting up and configuring service desk projects for our customer as external service desk. This functionality would be required to address some specific scenarios where customers report certain issues and incidents.

            Mark Scheepers added a comment - Is there a timeline when custom fields will become available in JIRA service desk request types? We are currently setting up and configuring service desk projects for our customer as external service desk. This functionality would be required to address some specific scenarios where customers report certain issues and incidents.

              Unassigned Unassigned
              jhansen@atlassian.com Joshua Hansen
              Votes:
              600 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              362 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: