Uploaded image for project: 'Jira Service Management Data Center'
  1. Jira Service Management Data Center
  2. JSDSERVER-1924

Provide an option to allowlist email addresses to prevent mail from them from being discarded as invalid under Service Desk settings

    • 587
    • 102
    • We collect Jira Service Desk feedback from various sources, and we evaluate what we've collected when planning our product roadmap. To understand how this piece of feedback will be reviewed, see our Implementation of New Features Policy.

      NOTE: This suggestion is for JIRA Service Desk Server. Using JIRA Service Desk Cloud? See the corresponding suggestion.

      Atlassian Update – 15 Sept 2022

      Hi all,

      Thank you so much for your votes and comments on this suggestion. We are currently working on a solution for this ticket. We have a few open questions about the design of this feature and would love to hear your feedback. Please send an email to lwalsh2@atlassian.com if you would like to join a 45-minute session over video conference on this topic in the next couple of weeks. In the email, please include the following details:

      • your company’s industry
      • the size of your company
      • how your company uses Jira Service Management (JSM)
      • a summary of how this problem affects your team

      Although we can't guarantee that we will be able to speak with all interested parties, we definitely appreciate your interest and enthusiasm to help us make JSM DC easier and more enjoyable to use.

      Thanks,

      Lisa

      Currently, the Email processor from under the Global Mail Settings will filter out:

      • auto-replied emails
      • mails marked as spam
      • delivery status notifications
      • emails originating from a JIRA instance

      In certain situations, automatically generated emails from alarm systems or automatically forwarded emails, can have a different value than "no" set for the Auto-Submitted header of the email.
      This will cause the email to get filtered out and not get further processed.
      The AutoReplyMailFilter filter will prevent these kind of emails from creating issues in Service Desk.

      Please provide an option to white-list email addresses to prevent them from being discarded as invalid emails under the Service Desk Email settings.
      Alternatively, provide an option to disable any of the above mentioned mail filters from the Service Desk Email settings section

      WORKAROUND

      NB: This workaround is not possible in Atlassian Cloud.

      1. Navigate to Administration > Add-ons > Manage add-ons (on newer versions of Jira this would be Administration > Manage Apps > Manage Manage Apps )
      2. Look for JIRA Service Desk and expand the section
      3. Expand the XXX of XXX modules enabled
      4. Disable these responsible modules of Service Desk:
        • SD Bulk filter(sdBulkFilter) for messages marked as spam
        • SD sent from JIRA filter(sdJiraFilter) for messages originating from a JIRA instance
        • SD auto reply filter(sdAutoReplyFilter) for messages with a different value than "no" set for the Auto-Submitted header

      The provided workaround will apply to all emails processed by the filter, which can cause incorrectly created issues. Being able to white-list addresses should prevent this from happening.
      To make sure that the right module has been disabled, run the query select * from pluginstate; and verify that com.atlassian.servicedesk:sdAutoReplyFilter is set to false.
      Later versions of JSM may have had the module names changed to the following:

      • Service project Bulk filter
      • Service project auto reply filter
      • Service project sent from Jira filter

        1. screenshot-1.png
          screenshot-1.png
          67 kB
        2. screenshot-2.png
          screenshot-2.png
          28 kB
        3. screenshot-3.png
          screenshot-3.png
          102 kB
        4. screenshot-4.png
          screenshot-4.png
          47 kB
        5. screenshot-5.png
          screenshot-5.png
          51 kB

          Form Name

            [JSDSERVER-1924] Provide an option to allowlist email addresses to prevent mail from them from being discarded as invalid under Service Desk settings

            Hi @assignee

            1) We need this option because every company has impact here. 

            EX: If you are using Azure alerts or cloup app alerts we need to send them directly to the Jira which consumes licenses in AD to create user. but we are using a single account for all alerts and forwarding them to Jira to create tickets. This helps us all alerts come from one Jira account and we don't need so many licenses for AD if you are using some random 15 applications.  This will be very helpful. 

            Naga Venkata Uday Kiran Kalangi added a comment - Hi @assignee 1) We need this option because every company has impact here.  EX: If you are using Azure alerts or cloup app alerts we need to send them directly to the Jira which consumes licenses in AD to create user. but we are using a single account for all alerts and forwarding them to Jira to create tickets. This helps us all alerts come from one Jira account and we don't need so many licenses for AD if you are using some random 15 applications.  This will be very helpful. 

            Lisa Walsh added a comment - - edited
            Atlassian Update – 15 Sept 2022

            Hi all,

            Thank you so much for your votes and comments on this suggestion. We are currently working on a solution for this ticket. We have a few open questions about the design of this feature and would love to hear your feedback. Please send an email to lwalsh2@atlassian.com if you would like to join a 45-minute session over video conference on this topic in the next couple of weeks. In the email, please include the following details:

            • your company’s industry
            • the size of your company
            • how your company uses Jira Service Management (JSM)
            • a summary of how this problem affects your team

            Although we can't guarantee that we will be able to speak with all interested parties, we definitely appreciate your interest and enthusiasm to help us make JSM DC easier and more enjoyable to use.

            Thanks,

            Lisa

            Lisa Walsh added a comment - - edited Atlassian Update – 15 Sept 2022 Hi all, Thank you so much for your votes and comments on this suggestion. We are currently working on a solution for this ticket. We have a few open questions about the design of this feature and would love to hear your feedback. Please send an email to lwalsh2@atlassian.com if you would like to join a 45-minute session over video conference on this topic in the next couple of weeks. In the email, please include the following details: your company’s industry the size of your company how your company uses Jira Service Management (JSM) a summary of how this problem affects your team Although we can't guarantee that we will be able to speak with all interested parties, we definitely appreciate your interest and enthusiasm to help us make JSM DC easier and more enjoyable to use. Thanks, Lisa

            We had exactly the same issue with Jira ServiceDesk (Server, not cloud).

            We’re using Microsoft O365 (Exchange Online) and “fixed” it there.

            We created an Exchange transport rule: 

            If the message is received from 'other at service dot com'

            Do the following:

            • and set message header 'Precedence' with the value 'first-class'
            • and Remove this header: 'Auto-Submitted'

            That works!

             

            Florian Obradovic added a comment - We had exactly the same issue with Jira ServiceDesk (Server, not cloud). We’re using Microsoft O365 (Exchange Online) and “fixed” it there. We created an Exchange transport rule:   If the message is received from 'other at service dot com' Do the following: and set message header 'Precedence' with the value 'first-class' and Remove this header: 'Auto-Submitted' That works!  

            Rexel USA added a comment -

            Any update on a prospective release of this feature to DC?

            Rexel USA added a comment - Any update on a prospective release of this feature to DC?

            of course +100 !!

            Admin Confluence added a comment - of course +100 !!

            +1

            We're considering dumping JSD in favour of ZD due to this one issue that is affecting all our clients with ZD

            James Holt added a comment - +1 We're considering dumping JSD in favour of ZD due to this one issue that is affecting all our clients with ZD

            Not having this as an option is driving teams to other service desk applications when we want to make sure we're all standardized on JSD/M.

            Darin Klein added a comment - Not having this as an option is driving teams to other service desk applications when we want to make sure we're all standardized on JSD/M.

            +1 here.

            Dave Raveling added a comment - +1 here.

            Absolutely needed to be able to handle email requests in a professional matter!

            Jan Erik Musiol added a comment - Absolutely needed to be able to handle email requests in a professional matter!

            News???

             

            306 votes and 6 years from ticket created! 

             

            Is very important, please.

            JiraSine95 added a comment - News???   306 votes and 6 years from ticket created!    Is very important, please.

            We would like this to be resolved also,

            This is a huge problem for us

             

            PriceTravel Atlassian Admin added a comment - We would like this to be resolved also, This is a huge problem for us  

            Atlassian pls +1

            Joshua Luna added a comment - Atlassian pls +1

            +1 

             

             

            Megan Makowiecka added a comment - +1     

            +1

            Please prioritize this ticket!

            Many thanks!

            Bojana Vasic added a comment - +1 Please prioritize this ticket! Many thanks!

            Why the hell it is still not solved?????????????????? Same request for Cloud is already solved: https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/JSDCLOUD-1924

            Petr Michna added a comment - Why the hell it is still not solved?????????????????? Same request for Cloud is already solved: https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/JSDCLOUD-1924

            +1 Important for System to System notifications

            Software-Admin added a comment - +1 Important for System to System notifications

            Ali Sipit added a comment -

            +1 This is needed to have any communication to other service desk notifications or bulk mails from services. Please treat this as critical, literally every other servicedesk tool has this feature

            Ali Sipit added a comment - +1 This is needed to have any communication to other service desk notifications or bulk mails from services. Please treat this as critical, literally every other servicedesk tool has this feature

            We have big issues with the SD Bulk filter as well. Despo mentions in a recent comment that disabling the filters (I guess he means the SD Bulk Filter among others)  stopped other mails from coming in. Has someone else experienced the same issue? Trying to figure out how to resolve the issue. 

             

            yordanka terziyska added a comment - We have big issues with the SD Bulk filter as well. Despo mentions in a recent comment that disabling the filters (I guess he means the SD Bulk Filter among others)  stopped other mails from coming in. Has someone else experienced the same issue? Trying to figure out how to resolve the issue.   

            This is becoming a huge problem for our company. Atlassian, please make any progress on this one. It's really critical.

            Lachezar Karadzhov added a comment - This is becoming a huge problem for our company. Atlassian, please make any progress on this one. It's really critical.

            As Dale mentioned, we would love to see all incoming emails for a project (optionally) go to a queue.  A JSD admin could then review those periodically and decide which ones should be allowed to create an account and become a ticket.

            Or alternately, as this request states, whitelist addresses/domains to allow them to be processed.

            Personally I like the queue idea as it provides a lot of flexibility.

            Absolutely essential feature, either way, and we urge Atlassian to take a serious look at this in the very near future ... that is, in 2020.

             

            Michael Woffenden added a comment - As Dale mentioned, we would love to see all incoming emails for a project (optionally) go to a queue.  A JSD admin could then review those periodically and decide which ones should be allowed to create an account and become a ticket. Or alternately, as this request states, whitelist addresses/domains to allow them to be processed. Personally I like the queue idea as it provides a lot of flexibility. Absolutely essential feature, either way, and we urge Atlassian to take a serious look at this in the very near future ... that is, in 2020.  

            Just to be a +1

            I would deeply appreciate this feature server side

            Torsten Hermes added a comment - Just to be a +1 I would deeply appreciate this feature server side

            Yes, need to able to receive all kinda of emails,[ due to an audit requirement ], so we need the ability to allow emails to come in, even if they go to a queue, before being an actual ticket . But we need to be able to get all kinda of emails into the service desk for incident reports from anywhere.

            Thanks

             

            Dale Thompson added a comment - Yes, need to able to receive all kinda of emails,[ due to an audit requirement ], so we need the ability to allow emails to come in, even if they go to a queue, before being an actual ticket . But we need to be able to get all kinda of emails into the service desk for incident reports from anywhere. Thanks  

            David added a comment -

            5 years, over 200 votes, 33 comments and already implemented on CLOUD version.. How much "interest gathering" is needed..? We suffer from this issue every day, running direct separate email issues with no followup in our SPOC..

            David added a comment - 5 years, over 200 votes, 33 comments and already implemented on CLOUD version.. How much "interest gathering" is needed..? We suffer from this issue every day, running direct separate email issues with no followup in our SPOC..

            despo.hadjipanayiotou added a comment - - edited

            Hi, I try to disable the filters and because of that, we didn't receive any email. I had to able the filters to receive again emails in my JSD. So, Don't try it.

            despo.hadjipanayiotou added a comment - - edited Hi, I try to disable the filters and because of that, we didn't receive any email. I had to able the filters to receive again emails in my JSD. So, Don't try it.

            Just discovered this limitation and it's really bad for us not having whilelist.

            pierre.ronnefalk added a comment - Just discovered this limitation and it's really bad for us not having whilelist.

            JodiG added a comment -

             It is vital for us too to be able to whitelist email addresses.  Agreed, this should be a priority!

            JodiG added a comment -  It is vital for us too to be able to whitelist email addresses.  Agreed, this should be a priority!

            Helle Buhl added a comment - - edited

            I really need to be able to whitelist email addresses too.

            I'am not sure what the consequences could be if I disable the filters? Anyone tried to disable the filters?

            Helle Buhl added a comment - - edited I really need to be able to whitelist email addresses too. I'am not sure what the consequences could be if I disable the filters? Anyone tried to disable the filters?

            It's vital that we be able to whitelist email addresses.  Atlassian team, please make this a priority!

            Michael Woffenden added a comment - It's vital that we be able to whitelist email addresses.  Atlassian team, please make this a priority!

            We need a kind of withlist feature per domain or per mailbox! 

             

            Managing +30 customers with different applications sending mails to our service desk. My requestmanagment is asking:  so why should i use Jira Service Desk when I have to double check the mailbox with the incoming queue? 

            Joachim Schenk added a comment - We need a kind of withlist feature per domain or per mailbox!    Managing +30 customers with different applications sending mails to our service desk. My requestmanagment is asking:  so why should i use Jira Service Desk when I have to double check the mailbox with the incoming queue? 

            I see a domain whitelist feature is now available in early August with cloud version ... why not server version?  Surely I would have though that server version takes priority over cloud version for development ... this is a real problem for us!

            Paul Stewart added a comment - I see a domain whitelist feature is now available in early August with cloud version ... why not server version?  Surely I would have though that server version takes priority over cloud version for development ... this is a real problem for us!

            For us the workaround was to use MS Exchange mail flow rules (RemoveHeader, see https://docs.microsoft.com/de-de/exchange/policy-and-compliance/mail-flow-rules/actions?view=exchserver-2019) to remove the header 'Auto-submitted' if the message was sent to the inbox of our Service Desk from designated sender addresses.

            Anton Kaiser added a comment - For us the workaround was to use MS Exchange mail flow rules ( RemoveHeader , see  https://docs.microsoft.com/de-de/exchange/policy-and-compliance/mail-flow-rules/actions?view=exchserver-2019 ) to remove the header 'Auto-submitted' if the message was sent to the inbox of our Service Desk from designated sender addresses.

            Patrick Monfette added a comment - - edited

            We're experiencing the very same issue as Roger above.

            Customer uses their own Service Desk to contact us and any reply they do includes

            Auto-Submitted: auto-generated 

            In it and thus, the e-mail gets rejected (From the mail audit log/Processing log under service desk e-mail config)

            18/Jan/19 3:32 PM REJECTED The message was rejected because it is auto-reply mail. xyz@xyz.com xyz subject SD auto reply filter

            We would like to be able to exclude (whitelist) this particular user from having this rule applied to them or have some way to allow this header to not trigger this actions for this particular user.

            Patrick Monfette added a comment - - edited We're experiencing the very same issue as Roger above. Customer uses their own Service Desk to contact us and any reply they do includes Auto-Submitted: auto-generated In it and thus, the e-mail gets rejected (From the mail audit log/Processing log under service desk e-mail config) 18/Jan/19 3:32 PM REJECTED The message was rejected because it is auto-reply mail. xyz@xyz.com xyz subject SD auto reply filter We would like to be able to exclude (whitelist) this particular user from having this rule applied to them or have some way to allow this header to not trigger this actions for this particular user.

            Roger Oberg added a comment - - edited

            We too are facing this problem. In our case, our Jira Service desk instance is used as 3rd line support, to which our customer is forwarding their issues from their own service desk when they need help from us.

            This is working somewhat ok, and issues are created in our instance where we could work with them...

            However, if the person who raised the original issue in the customer's service desk, updates that issue with a new comment. The comment is then forwarded to us with the "Auto-Submitted: auto-generated" flag set. And because of that, the message is filtered out, and we can´t see the comment in our Jira service desk, which is not really helpful.

            Roger Oberg added a comment - - edited We too are facing this problem. In our case, our Jira Service desk instance is used as 3rd line support, to which our customer is forwarding their issues from their own service desk when they need help from us. This is working somewhat ok, and issues are created in our instance where we could work with them... However, if the person who raised the original issue in the customer's service desk, updates that issue with a new comment. The comment is then forwarded to us with the "Auto-Submitted: auto-generated" flag set. And because of that, the message is filtered out, and we can´t see the comment in our Jira service desk, which is not really helpful.

            It is rediculus that this is not implemented...

            We are using automation which is sending emails and these emails are not processed, because are marked as a bulk. The only option is to disable Bulk and Auto reply filters.

            Ladislav Esterka added a comment - It is rediculus that this is not implemented... We are using automation which is sending emails and these emails are not processed, because are marked as a bulk. The only option is to disable Bulk and Auto reply filters.

            For those uncertain on how to do this now that Service Desk is an application. 

            You want to go to Add-ons > Manage Apps > Application Components (Drop down box next to search field) > Expand Jira Email Processor Plugin > Expand Modules > Disable "Auto-Reply Mail Filter" (auto-reply-mail-filter).

            Have tested it works for my Service-Now clients. I agree though, definitely needs to be clearer on how this occurs.

            Review logs of emails processed should be easier to review and approve and whitelist. 

            However, to note, it being a certain module like that means I imagine someone may be able to open it up, review the code and create a 'plugin' as such that allows whitelist configurations by simply adding a few exceptions to the processor.

            Scancam Support added a comment - For those uncertain on how to do this now that Service Desk is an application.  You want to go to Add-ons > Manage Apps > Application Components   (Drop down box next to search field) > Expand Jira Email Processor Plugin > Expand Modules > Disable "Auto-Reply Mail Filter" (auto-reply-mail-filter). Have tested it works for my Service-Now clients. I agree though, definitely needs to be clearer on how this occurs. Review logs of emails processed should be easier to review and approve and whitelist.  However, to note, it being a certain module like that means I imagine someone may be able to open it up, review the code and create a 'plugin' as such that allows whitelist configurations by simply adding a few exceptions to the processor.

            This is an absolute must for us.

            When an email bounces back to Service Desk, no one knows about the communication failure unless they can go into email mailbox to see the Delivery Failures. This can happen simply because of a typo in the email address.

            Someone has to find the bounced email and manually locate the ticket that the mail relates to in order to respond.

            Please give us control over the handling of bounced messages.

            Mark Johnson added a comment - This is an absolute must for us. When an email bounces back to Service Desk, no one knows about the communication failure unless they can go into email mailbox to see the Delivery Failures. This can happen simply because of a typo in the email address. Someone has to find the bounced email and manually locate the ticket that the mail relates to in order to respond. Please give us control over the handling of bounced messages.

            Henri Virtanen! added a comment - - edited

            We also need a way to either whitelist our customers or somehow configure the settings of the mail filters. We have removed these filters to get our customers emails (from ServiceNow) to tickets, but we need to find a better solution to this, because we can't run forever without those filters. Even with those filters disabled, some of the customers email replies won't generate as customer comments to JiraSD ticket.

            While waiting for that option to whitelist a customer domain to mail filters, is there a way to handle this situation? Either:

            • To tell our customer to modify their settings for the outgoing emails
              or
            • Somehow configure JiraSD to allow those emails to be read as a tickets.

            Henri Virtanen! added a comment - - edited We also need a way to either whitelist our customers or somehow configure the settings of the mail filters. We have removed these filters to get our customers emails (from ServiceNow) to tickets, but we need to find a better solution to this, because we can't run forever without those filters. Even with those filters disabled, some of the customers email replies won't generate as customer comments to JiraSD ticket. While waiting for that option to whitelist a customer domain to mail filters, is there a way to handle this situation? Either: To tell our customer to modify their settings for the outgoing emails or Somehow configure JiraSD to allow those emails to be read as a tickets.

            We would like this to be resolved also. 

            Deven Patel added a comment - We would like this to be resolved also. 

            This workaround is no longer available as Service Desk is now an Application and not an add on.

            We REALLY need an answer to this issue please.

            Hamid Nayeri added a comment - This workaround is no longer available as Service Desk is now an Application and not an add on. We REALLY need an answer to this issue please.

            Nick Piper added a comment -

            We need this feature too.

            Nick Piper added a comment - We need this feature too.

            Any Update on this feature. I have no way to control what tickets I want created.

            Technology Helpdesk added a comment - Any Update on this feature. I have no way to control what tickets I want created.

            Please add this feature as soon as possible. Thank you!

            Tommy Sahlen added a comment - Please add this feature as soon as possible. Thank you!

            Whitelisting would be useful as the solution (if I've read this correctly) could compromise what is correctly filtered.

            Conversely (and I've asked this of Valantys today) could we black list if we saw activity we didn't want or expect.  i guess Autobot or Notification Rules could help?

             

             

            Paul Wright added a comment - Whitelisting would be useful as the solution (if I've read this correctly) could compromise what is correctly filtered. Conversely (and I've asked this of Valantys today) could we black list if we saw activity we didn't want or expect.  i guess Autobot or Notification Rules could help?    

            We run into the same problem. Including a new feature for providing whitelisting would solve a lot of mail problems caused by the SD mail filters.

            Soporte Excentia added a comment - We run into the same problem. Including a new feature for providing whitelisting would solve a lot of mail problems caused by the SD mail filters.

            Sajid Khan added a comment -

            Just hit the same problem. Using Cloud system. any time frame on a fix ?

             

            Sajid Khan added a comment - Just hit the same problem. Using Cloud system. any time frame on a fix ?  

            This is a HUGE issue that cost me customers. Disabling a bulk or auto reply email filter is not a good answer Atlassian. Need a whitelist or ability to modify the settings on which emails are accepted or rejected.

            Jason Huntowski added a comment - This is a HUGE issue that cost me customers. Disabling a bulk or auto reply email filter is not a good answer Atlassian. Need a whitelist or ability to modify the settings on which emails are accepted or rejected.

            This is a major issue for our company.

            Brett Larson added a comment - This is a major issue for our company.

            Being able to edit these filters is a crucial part of the ticket flow and email requests. 

            Dallan Jones added a comment - Being able to edit these filters is a crucial part of the ticket flow and email requests. 

            We have the same problem in JIRA Service Desk, when a customer replies the emails are seen as Auto Reply mails by the "SD Auto Reply Fliter" handler, and we are not able to disable the sdAutoReplyFilter even as Admins.

            Corina Grigore added a comment - We have the same problem in JIRA Service Desk, when a customer replies the emails are seen as Auto Reply mails by the "SD Auto Reply Fliter" handler, and we are not able to disable the sdAutoReplyFilter even as Admins.

            We have the same problem in JIRA Service Desk, forwarded mails will be seen as Auto Reply mails by the "SD Auto Reply Fliter" handler, and we are not able to disable the sdAutoReplyFilter even as Admins.

            This causes a problem for us, we want to use a central email adress with a forwarding rule to forward mails to JIRA in order to create issues through email requests.

            Nico Buffing added a comment - We have the same problem in JIRA Service Desk, forwarded mails will be seen as Auto Reply mails by the "SD Auto Reply Fliter" handler, and we are not able to disable the sdAutoReplyFilter even as Admins. This causes a problem for us, we want to use a central email adress with a forwarding rule to forward mails to JIRA in order to create issues through email requests.

            no, i cannot disable the SD bulk filter. 

            I can request it to be disabled by support - however, with any new version of JIRA cloud, the filter is enabled again.....

            Pieter Smit added a comment - no, i cannot disable the SD bulk filter.  I can request it to be disabled by support - however, with any new version of JIRA cloud, the filter is enabled again.....

            Pieter you can disable the email filter module, though it's not ideal.

             

            https://answers.atlassian.com/questions/12911940/sd-bulk-filter

            Nick Thieling added a comment - Pieter you can disable the email filter module, though it's not ideal.   https://answers.atlassian.com/questions/12911940/sd-bulk-filter

            I just want to disable the SD bulk filter at this point - as it only gives us issues, while it does not add any benefits we not already have from our email provider......

            Pieter Smit added a comment - I just want to disable the SD bulk filter at this point - as it only gives us issues, while it does not add any benefits we not already have from our email provider......

            Being troubled by this issue as well. I hope that Atlassian can build in some sort of function to allow an administrator to modify or improve the filter query/datapoints. Or at the very least, a whitelist as this issue recommends.

            Nick Thieling added a comment - Being troubled by this issue as well. I hope that Atlassian can build in some sort of function to allow an administrator to modify or improve the filter query/datapoints. Or at the very least, a whitelist as this issue recommends.

            JP Dicks added a comment -

            upvote.

            JP Dicks added a comment - upvote.

            thanks @tom.tabruyn - i've contacted support.

            Pieter Smit added a comment - thanks @tom.tabruyn - i've contacted support.

            @Pieter, the menu is still there, but relocated:

            • Administration -> Add-Ons
            • Manage add-ons
            • Application Components (in the 2nd dropdown box)
            • Jira Service Desk: expand
            • 228 modules enabled:: expand
            • SD Bulk filter / auto reply filter / SD sent from jia filter: disablen

            Note that I disabled my auto reply filter there a couple of weeks / months ago, but at this very moment it says for all 3: "Module cannot be modified". You might still want to contact support directly...

            Tom Tabruyn added a comment - @Pieter, the menu is still there, but relocated: Administration -> Add-Ons Manage add-ons Application Components (in the 2nd dropdown box) Jira Service Desk: expand 228 modules enabled:: expand SD Bulk filter / auto reply filter / SD sent from jia filter: disablen Note that I disabled my auto reply filter there a couple of weeks / months ago, but at this very moment it says for all 3: "Module cannot be modified". You might still want to contact support directly...

              cmarriott Charlie Marriott
              mnassette MJ (Inactive)
              Votes:
              368 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              242 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: