• 1,340
    • 164
    • Our product teams collect and evaluate feedback from a number of different sources. To learn more about how we use customer feedback in the planning process, check out our new feature policy.

      Update as of 12/Jul/2021

      Hello everyone,

      Thank you for sharing your feedback. We evaluated this ticket and understand that this is something we need to work on. However, we will not be able to prioritise this at the moment as there are other items in the short term roadmap which are higher priority. We will definitely get back to you once we pick this up in our short term roadmap.

      Regards,
      Sushant Koshy, Product Manager, Jira Service Management

       

      NOTE: This suggestion is for JIRA Service Desk Cloud. Using JIRA Service Desk Server? See the corresponding suggestion.

      Original request

      Problem Definition

      Currently, Assignee field is hidden from the portal.

      Suggested Solution

      Allow to set Assignee field to be visible by the customers in read-only mode

      Why this is important

      In some cases, we would like to make the Assignee to be visible. Example:

      • Show Assignee field on "Account Access" requests, so the internal users know who is the user to follow up with if the request hasn't been updated.

      Workaround

      Option 1

      This add-on allows showing additional fields and stats in the customer portal such as assignee, time spent and who's viewing the page.

      Option 2

      Another alternative is to use Forms feature:

      • You can create a new form and add to it a single-user type field
      • Set the form to link a Jira field to it, selecting Assignee Jira default field
      • Then, on Form Settings, you may enable "Request form" and "Create new issue" options - on this, you'll be asked to choose a Request type to be used as reference
      • After the above, whenever a customer raises a ticket using the selected Request Type, the new form will be used to be filled, what means Assignee field will be shown as selectable
      Original request

      Client would like a way to add assignee as a VISIBLE field and not just a hidden field on customer view.

            [JSDCLOUD-328] Allow Assignee to be Shown on Customer Portal

            Any updates, Atlassian team? 😁

            Mihail Zhestkov added a comment - Any updates, Atlassian team? 😁

            +1 need this feature added.

            Pedro Correa added a comment - +1 need this feature added.

            Leo Prakash_CodeForMe_ added a comment - - edited

            Just wanted to share a potential workaround that might help others facing a similar need.

            We published a free app on the Marketplace called Extended JSM Portal - FREE Atlassian Marketplace. It allows project admins to display selected read-only fields on the customer portal, which can be useful in scenarios where customers need better context without edit access.

            if you feel customers also should need edit permission on set of fields(per request type) post-submission, you may want to consider our another app Extended JSM Portal - PRO Atlassian Marketplace

            If your use case aligns with this, feel free to check it out — it might serve as a temporary solution until native support is available.

             

            Feel free to reach out to us if you have any queries  

            Leo Prakash_CodeForMe_ added a comment - - edited Just wanted to share a potential workaround that might help others facing a similar need. We published a free app on the Marketplace called Extended JSM Portal - FREE Atlassian Marketplace . It allows project admins to display selected read-only fields on the customer portal, which can be useful in scenarios where customers need better context without edit access. if you feel customers also should need edit permission on set of fields(per request type) post-submission, you may want to consider our another app Extended JSM Portal - PRO Atlassian Marketplace If your use case aligns with this, feel free to check it out — it might serve as a temporary solution until native support is available.   Feel free to reach out to us if you have any queries  

            +1 on making this a feature.

            Tobias Duong added a comment - +1 on making this a feature.

            The world would benefit from this feature. Time to put it on the roadmap!

            Anton Brinster added a comment - The world would benefit from this feature. Time to put it on the roadmap!

            Please prioritize this with other features like linked issues, SLAs etc. in the customer view.

            Simen Vågsæter added a comment - Please prioritize this with other features like linked issues, SLAs etc. in the customer view.

            oh no, come on, is this not in place already  

            Cornelia Jeppsson added a comment - oh no, come on, is this not in place already  

            Marcel E. added a comment -

            It's getting really embarrassing how many basic functions are being artificially withheld so that people need to buy expensive add-ons.

            And we pay USD 7,200 a month for this ...

            Marcel E. added a comment - It's getting really embarrassing how many basic functions are being artificially withheld so that people need to buy expensive add-ons. And we pay USD 7,200 a month for this ...

            +1 on making this a feature.

            Hayden Mccarry added a comment - +1 on making this a feature.

            +1 - Our Customers are internal and for specific Request Typs it would be more then useful to show the assignee.

            Sören Calvert added a comment - +1 - Our Customers are internal and for specific Request Typs it would be more then useful to show the assignee.

            I found out today we can now add the Assignee on the portal view (hope it is not caused by a plugin hehe)

            tiago.santos added a comment - I found out today we can now add the Assignee on the portal view (hope it is not caused by a plugin hehe)

            +1

            Ezana Ceman added a comment - +1

            a3e2088cf3a4 that's nothing, in the past six months or so I have seen two 20 year old requests finally delivered.

            Rick Westbrock added a comment - a3e2088cf3a4 that's nothing, in the past six months or so I have seen two 20 year old requests finally delivered.

            Um.. I see this request has been made 10 years ago... so no solution yet...? Kinda shameful to be honest

            Franco Zinni added a comment - Um.. I see this request has been made 10 years ago... so no solution yet...? Kinda shameful to be honest

            Aileen added a comment -

            Hello Atlassian,

            In our environment, I see customers @ mentioning assignees because they aren't sure if their issue will be going to the right person. In some situations, they might have been talking with an administrator prior to submitting the issue, and are @ mentioning that administrator in their issue submission.

            In a recent release, I believe @ mentioned people in the issue automatically get converted into request participants. This causes a problem with our time to first response SLA because if the assignee is also a request participant, then when the assignee goes to reply to customer, that comment does not stop the SLA. So our assignees have to constantly remove their names from the request participant list and then reply to customer.

            Looking forward to a resolution where the customer sees that Assignee on the portal view (next to their issue description), so that they don't feel the need to add the assignee separately to the request participant list or @ mention them (which in turn converts the person into a request participant and blocks SLA comments)

            I also just think it makes sense for the customer to know who is working on their issue in case they need to call them.

            For larger organizations, this may not be as necessary, but for small to medium size organizations, that communication between customer and assignee is vital.

            Aileen added a comment - Hello Atlassian, In our environment, I see customers @ mentioning assignees because they aren't sure if their issue will be going to the right person. In some situations, they might have been talking with an administrator prior to submitting the issue, and are @ mentioning that administrator in their issue submission. In a recent release, I believe @ mentioned people in the issue automatically get converted into request participants. This causes a problem with our time to first response SLA because if the assignee is also a request participant, then when the assignee goes to reply to customer, that comment does not stop the SLA. So our assignees have to constantly remove their names from the request participant list and then reply to customer. Looking forward to a resolution where the customer sees that Assignee on the portal view (next to their issue description), so that they don't feel the need to add the assignee separately to the request participant list or @ mention them (which in turn converts the person into a request participant and blocks SLA comments) I also just think it makes sense for the customer to know who is working on their issue in case they need to call them. For larger organizations, this may not be as necessary, but for small to medium size organizations, that communication between customer and assignee is vital.

            George G added a comment -

            Any updates? 🤡

            George G added a comment - Any updates? 🤡

            +1

            George G added a comment -

            Atlassian clearly don't care. I am growing weary of letting down our stakeholders with simple features that are not possible and have been ignored for almost a decade.

            George G added a comment - Atlassian clearly don't care . I am growing weary of letting down our stakeholders with simple features that are not possible and have been ignored for almost a decade.

            Update on my comment of 22/03/2024 :

            I was searching for a work-a-round and I found something that fixed my problem.

            Don't know if this is the shortest way, but this is what I did.

            I logged in with my administrator user on the portal.

            You should see a customize button.

            (Click on it. Do you see the columns and if they are selectable? I did not do this step at this time, so I don't know if they are visible at this time).

            I clicked on the three dots at the top right.

            I choose Manage columns

            I removed a column

            I clicked on the customize button

            There I saw the columns that could be visible. Assignee was not selected, so I selected it.

            Then I added assignee.

            I asked the customer/user to test and she confirmed that the assignee column was visible.

            So for me this issue is solved.

            Hope this helps you.

             

            Dorine Cneudt | ALSICO added a comment - Update on my comment of 22/03/2024 : I was searching for a work-a-round and I found something that fixed my problem. Don't know if this is the shortest way, but this is what I did. I logged in with my administrator user on the portal. You should see a customize button. (Click on it. Do you see the columns and if they are selectable? I did not do this step at this time, so I don't know if they are visible at this time). I clicked on the three dots at the top right. I choose Manage columns I removed a column I clicked on the customize button There I saw the columns that could be visible. Assignee was not selected, so I selected it. Then I added assignee. I asked the customer/user to test and she confirmed that the assignee column was visible. So for me this issue is solved. Hope this helps you.  

            Fishcode added a comment -

            Totally agree with Dorine.

            Over this snail progression on this issue, there's something even more irritating:

            I opened a ticket to the support but one Atlassian employee gave me the following "reason" why this is not implemented.  He wrote that

            Agents pick tickets to work on from a queue, or they're assigned tickets. Having a customer give a key to an agent is not wise. Consider this: what if the agent is on vacation?

            What do you guys think of such "reason"? I would call it a lame excuse.

            Personally, I do not understand what he meant by "Having a customer give a key to an agent".  What key?  Whatever.

            I'm thinking to myself:

            If the agent is on vacations but nobody noticed this, that's the company's problem and the queue manager should be fired!  And if an agent holds on some tickets before vacations but does not tell his manager to reassign his tickets to other agents, that agent should be fired!

            In any case, nobody would blame Atlassian for that reason.  Atlassian is just a tool.  It's annoying when the tool thinks it is smarter than the users!

             

            Fishcode added a comment - Totally agree with Dorine. Over this snail progression on this issue, there's something even more irritating: I opened a ticket to the support but one Atlassian employee gave me the following "reason" why this is not implemented.  He wrote that Agents pick tickets to work on from a queue, or they're assigned tickets. Having a customer give a key to an agent is not wise. Consider this: what if the agent is on vacation? What do you guys think of such "reason"? I would call it a lame excuse. Personally, I do not understand what he meant by "Having a customer give a key to an agent".  What key?  Whatever. I'm thinking to myself: If the agent is on vacations but nobody noticed this, that's the company's problem and the queue manager should be fired!  And if an agent holds on some tickets before vacations but does not tell his manager to reassign his tickets to other agents, that agent should be fired! In any case, nobody would blame Atlassian for that reason.  Atlassian is just a tool.  It's annoying when the tool thinks it is smarter than the users!  

            Dorine Cneudt | ALSICO added a comment - - edited

            Updated :

            I was searching for a work-a-round and I found something that fixed my problem.

            Don't know if this is the shortest way, but this is what I did.

            I logged in with my administrator user on the portal.

            You should see a customize button.

            (Click on it. Do you see the columns and if they are selectable? I did not do this step at this time, so I don't know if they are visible at this time).

            I clicked on the three dots at the top right.

            I choose Manage columns

            I removed a column

            I clicked on the customize button

            There I saw the columns that could be visible. Assignee was not selected, so I selected it.

            Then I added assignee.

            I asked the customer/user to test and she confirmed that the assignee column was visible.

            So for me this issue is solved.

            Hope this helps you.

             

             

             

            Original comment:

            Our portal users would like to see who is handling their request.

            This seems a basic functionality  to me. Don't understand why you need to install plugins and pay for them??

            Dorine Cneudt | ALSICO added a comment - - edited Updated : I was searching for a work-a-round and I found something that fixed my problem. Don't know if this is the shortest way, but this is what I did. I logged in with my administrator user on the portal. You should see a customize button. (Click on it. Do you see the columns and if they are selectable? I did not do this step at this time, so I don't know if they are visible at this time). I clicked on the three dots at the top right. I choose Manage columns I removed a column I clicked on the customize button There I saw the columns that could be visible. Assignee was not selected, so I selected it. Then I added assignee. I asked the customer/user to test and she confirmed that the assignee column was visible. So for me this issue is solved. Hope this helps you.       Original comment: Our portal users would like to see who is handling their request. This seems a basic functionality  to me. Don't understand why you need to install plugins and pay for them??

            Apologies for the shameless plug... but if you are interested in exposing additional fields (View Only) to the customer portal including Assignee, we are delighted to share we built an app that does EXACTLY that and recently published it into the marketplace; we called it JSMXtend - Additional Fields for Jira Service Management.

            We'd love your feedback!

            If this is something you could be interested in trying you could do so here:

            https://marketplace.atlassian.com/apps/1233329/jsmxtend-additional-fields-for-jira-service-management?hosting=cloud&tab=overview

            Bert Lasley added a comment - Apologies for the shameless plug... but if you are interested in exposing additional fields (View Only) to the customer portal including Assignee , we are delighted to share we built an app that does EXACTLY that and recently published it into the marketplace; we called it JSMXtend - Additional Fields for Jira Service Management . We'd love your feedback! If this is something you could be interested in trying you could do so here: https://marketplace.atlassian.com/apps/1233329/jsmxtend-additional-fields-for-jira-service-management?hosting=cloud&tab=overview

            Vinh Le added a comment -

            Hello @Julian,

            Thanks Julian. But my issue is not resolved now because I have another rule when the ticket is created it will be automation assign the ticket to users, can't run simultaneously and I don't want the automation rule to reach the limit.

            Regards,

            Vinh Le added a comment - Hello @Julian, Thanks Julian. But my issue is not resolved now because I have another rule when the ticket is created it will be automation assign the ticket to users, can't run simultaneously and I don't want the automation rule to reach the limit. Regards,

            Josh added a comment -

            Thank you for sharing your solution, Julian.

            The downside to that workaround vs an Atlassian-provided solution is that it generates a notification to the customer, agent, request participants, etc. whenever a request is assigned or reassigned.

            Many users already feel that Jira notifications provide too much "noise", and the additional notifications would worsen the problem.

            I'd still like to see a built-in solution for this without a workaround required.

            Josh added a comment - Thank you for sharing your solution, Julian. The downside to that workaround vs an Atlassian-provided solution is that it generates a notification to the customer, agent, request participants, etc. whenever a request is assigned or reassigned. Many users already feel that Jira notifications provide too much "noise", and the additional notifications would worsen the problem. I'd still like to see a built-in solution for this without a workaround required.

            Julian Bromwich added a comment - - edited

            I've been using a couple of Automations to get around this issue for years.    Completely free and only takes 2 mins to implement...

             

            1) Show Assignee in Portal View comments:

            When: Issue assigned
            Condition: Assignee is not empty
            Then: Add comment to issue:   "The request has been assigned to [~accountid:{{issue.assignee.accountId}}]

            2) Show Re-Assignee in Portal View comments:

            When: Value changes for:  Assignee
            Then: Add comment to issue:   "The request has been assigned to [~accountid:{{issue.assignee.accountId}}]

             

            Julian Bromwich added a comment - - edited I've been using a couple of Automations to get around this issue for years.    Completely free and only takes 2 mins to implement...   1) Show Assignee in Portal View comments: When: Issue assigned Condition: Assignee is not empty Then: Add comment to issue:   "The request has been assigned to [~accountid:{{issue.assignee.accountId}}] 2) Show Re-Assignee in Portal View comments: When: Value changes for:  Assignee Then: Add comment to issue:   "The request has been assigned to [~accountid:{{issue.assignee.accountId}}]  

            Vinh Le added a comment - - edited

            +1 any update for this request?

            or work around (Maybe automation add comment and tag assignee? )

            Vinh Le added a comment - - edited +1 any update for this request? or work around (Maybe automation add comment and tag assignee? )

            Tim Buckingham added a comment - - edited

            Even though the addon "Issue Details for Jira Service Desk" recommended does not have the best reviews I'm pretty desperate to have this basic functionality but guess what I can'y even install the app from the Jira marketplace due to an error. smh 

            Tim Buckingham added a comment - - edited Even though the addon "Issue Details for Jira Service Desk" recommended does not have the best reviews I'm pretty desperate to have this basic functionality but guess what I can'y even install the app from the Jira marketplace due to an error. smh 

            Displaying information (Assignee, SLA, custom fields) to your customer is such a basic and expected functionality. I find it ridiculous that Atlassian recommend marketplace addons to achieve this.

            It's like buying a car to drive you to your destination and the dealership is like "Oh indicators? We didn't think customers would want those... Go to the garage down the road and buy some there."... (and we'll take a cut)

            If it's basic expected functionality that everyone thinks should be included, Atlassian should include it with the product. If it's additional enhancements then allow marketplace developers innovate and add additional value.

            Assignee is already visible in the portal request list. Surfacing the information to the customer issue view wouldn't be that hard, it's just another panel with some fields on...

            At this point however, if Atlassian actually deliver basic functionality like this, they are impacting their own revenue generated by marketplace developers.

            From a business perspective I appreciate that most development focus should be placed on new functionality and products that will draw in more customers and licence sales so that stakeholders can buy more yachts or whatever it is they do. However at some point the new customers are going to find out that basic missing functionality isn't likely to make it to a short term roadmap for around a decade...

            I don't know how much of an impact this would need to have on customer retention for it to make a real difference and change behavior. In the meantime I guess we just watch things like this be de-prioritised every few years.

            David Meredith added a comment - Displaying information (Assignee, SLA, custom fields) to your customer is such a basic and expected functionality. I find it ridiculous that Atlassian recommend marketplace addons to achieve this. It's like buying a car to drive you to your destination and the dealership is like "Oh indicators? We didn't think customers would want those... Go to the garage down the road and buy some there."... (and we'll take a cut) If it's basic expected functionality that everyone thinks should be included, Atlassian should include it with the product. If it's additional enhancements then allow marketplace developers innovate and add additional value. Assignee is already visible in the portal request list. Surfacing the information to the customer issue view wouldn't be that hard, it's just another panel with some fields on... At this point however, if Atlassian actually deliver basic functionality like this, they are impacting their own revenue generated by marketplace developers. From a business perspective I appreciate that most development focus should be placed on new functionality and products that will draw in more customers and licence sales so that stakeholders can buy more yachts or whatever it is they do. However at some point the new customers are going to find out that basic missing functionality isn't likely to make it to a short term roadmap for around a decade... I don't know how much of an impact this would need to have on customer retention for it to make a real difference and change behavior. In the meantime I guess we just watch things like this be de-prioritised every few years.

            They won't prioritize again, because "there are more important items" - Since 2014.

            At the same time... they release silly features like Action in Automation with Reactions .

            Ariel Kauan added a comment - They won't prioritize again, because "there are more important items" - Since 2014. At the same time... they release silly features like Action in Automation with Reactions .

            Hi @itrojahn@atlassian.com 

            Could you please our app to the Option 1 list? We have this feature in our own Feature Bundle app. I will be appreciated.

            Christopher Skoropada [Appsvio] added a comment - Hi @ itrojahn@atlassian.com   Could you please our app to the Option 1 list? We have this feature in our own Feature Bundle app. I will be appreciated.

            How difficult can it be to add a function like this? Please add this feature.

            Simen Vågsæter added a comment - How difficult can it be to add a function like this? Please add this feature.

            Aaron Geister added a comment - - edited

            @SEAK Teng Fong

            If you go to the JSM project and go to FORMS option you can create a new form for Assignee. Add a new field called assignee and link it to the assignee field. Then have this form default to all requests.
            This will make the produce the assignee field on the portal in the center of the request.

            I don't have attachment permission in this request so I can't add a screenshot.

            Aaron Geister added a comment - - edited @SEAK Teng Fong If you go to the JSM project and go to FORMS option you can create a new form for Assignee. Add a new field called assignee and link it to the assignee field. Then have this form default to all requests. This will make the produce the assignee field on the portal in the center of the request. I don't have attachment permission in this request so I can't add a screenshot.

            @Aaron Geister

            That sounds really good as a temporary workaround.

            However, I'm unable to find that form you talked about.  Would it be possible to have some screen shots?

            SEAK Teng-Fong added a comment - @Aaron Geister That sounds really good as a temporary workaround. However, I'm unable to find that form you talked about.  Would it be possible to have some screen shots?

            There is a work around to use a Form called assignee and make it default on the request and when the assignee is assigned it will populate via the form. I have done this and it works well. You can make it so it locks the form and makes it read only.

            Aaron Geister added a comment - There is a work around to use a Form called assignee and make it default on the request and when the assignee is assigned it will populate via the form. I have done this and it works well. You can make it so it locks the form and makes it read only.

            Another long-waiting request which is NEVER implemented.

            I'm starting to think that Atlassian programmers are either too lazy or too incompetent.  And the choice is difficult.

            So disappointing!

            SEAK Teng-Fong added a comment - Another long-waiting request which is NEVER implemented. I'm starting to think that Atlassian programmers are either too lazy or too incompetent.  And the choice is difficult. So disappointing!

            After all these years, just put an intern on this and get it done.

            Matthew Challenger added a comment - After all these years, just put an intern on this and get it done.

            The ticket update is quite old. Do you have any predictions for this?

            Ariel Kauan added a comment - The ticket update is quite old. Do you have any predictions for this?

            AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA why are you ignoring us? Is this issue so difficult to add?

            Oskar Sokołowski added a comment - AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA why are you ignoring us? Is this issue so difficult to add?

            Mark Ellis added a comment -

            I wish we could see who THIS request was assigned to so we could get this resolved, but....... oh wait, we can.

            We just can't show our customers who their requests are assigned to. 🤦🏻‍♂️

            Can we please get some attention here, Sushant Koshy?

            Mark Ellis added a comment - I wish we could see who THIS request was assigned to so we could get this resolved, but....... oh wait, we can. We just can't show our customers who their requests are assigned to. 🤦🏻‍♂️ Can we please get some attention here, Sushant Koshy?

            George G added a comment -

            +1 Very disappointing that this request has been ignored for so long

            George G added a comment - +1 Very disappointing that this request has been ignored for so long

            Please prioritize this.

            It is not a daily problem, but it happens almost every week someone that is assigned to the case as "request participants" come into the office and ask: "is it me, that should do something about this?"

            And we reply, no the case is assigned to Mr X, you ar just on a need-to-know list. And the natural answer is every time, "why on earth, do you not write that so I can see it..."  and I have no better answer than "just the way Jira works, sorry" 

             

            Carsten Ager added a comment - Please prioritize this. It is not a daily problem, but it happens almost every week someone that is assigned to the case as "request participants" come into the office and ask: "is it me, that should do something about this?" And we reply, no the case is assigned to Mr X, you ar just on a need-to-know list. And the natural answer is every time, "why on earth, do you not write that so I can see it..."  and I have no better answer than "just the way Jira works, sorry"   

            How come after 9 years, the simple request of asking for the assignee to be visible in a task is not possible?  V odd.

            Mark Murray added a comment - How come after 9 years, the simple request of asking for the assignee to be visible in a task is not possible?  V odd.

            The strangest thing is that Atlassian have allowed the assignee to be surfaced to the JSM Portal already in the Help Center request list where you can surface:

            • Type
            • Reference
            • Summary
            • Status
            • Service project
            • Requester
            • Created date
            • Updated date
            • Due date
            • Assignee
            • Priority

            There's no option to surface custom fields though. Or even surface basic things like SLA to the customer portal. Although these have at least reached 'Under Consideration' in:
            https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/JSDCLOUD-325

            https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/JSDCLOUD-4328

            David Meredith added a comment - The strangest thing is that Atlassian have allowed the assignee to be surfaced to the JSM Portal already in the Help Center request list where you can surface: Type Reference Summary Status Service project Requester Created date Updated date Due date Assignee Priority There's no option to surface custom fields though. Or even surface basic things like SLA to the customer portal. Although these have at least reached 'Under Consideration' in: https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/JSDCLOUD-325 https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/JSDCLOUD-4328

            Ahmed Zeb added a comment - - edited

            For now, The workaround could be to use forms and expose the assignee field only in that particular form and making sure that form is submitted so that the assignee field is read-only. Thanks

            Ahmed Zeb added a comment - - edited For now, The workaround could be to use forms and expose the assignee field only in that particular form and making sure that form is submitted so that the assignee field is read-only. Thanks

            +1 - definite gap

            Cathy Vizard added a comment - +1 - definite gap

            Ahmed Zeb added a comment -

            Hi,

             

            This should be optionally visible where the project admin should be able to configure whether to show the assignee on the portal in the request view or not.

             

            Thanks

            Ahmed Zeb added a comment - Hi,   This should be optionally visible where the project admin should be able to configure whether to show the assignee on the portal in the request view or not.   Thanks

            +1 please resolve this.

            Muhammad Rafly Andrianza added a comment - +1 please resolve this.

            Drew added a comment - - edited

            Clearly there is a benefit to this since this suggestion... since there is an assignee visible on this issue where we're asking for a visible assignee. How does that make any sense lol

            Drew added a comment - - edited Clearly there is a benefit to this since this suggestion... since there is an assignee visible on this issue where we're asking for a visible assignee. How does that make any sense lol

            +1 !!! please

            Benji Chua Zhihao added a comment - +1 !!! please

            Very basic functionality. How is this not out of the box?

            Matthew Challenger added a comment - Very basic functionality. How is this not out of the box?

            Rick Brown added a comment -

            This should be obvious.

            Rick Brown added a comment - This should be obvious.

            KJ added a comment -

            +1, this seems like a very basic ask

            KJ added a comment - +1, this seems like a very basic ask

            +1 please

            Yatish Madhav added a comment - +1 please

            Hello everyone!

            I'm Elyes, a Product Manager at Elements Apps
            Following up my comment on JSDCLOUD-4328, you can use Elements Overview, to answer this use case very easily.

            You can configure an overview that displays the assignee of "related" issues on other issues or on the customers portal. We can configure an overview based on the current issue key, which results in displaying additional information on the portal of the request (like the assignee)

            Don't hesitate to try it out

            Elyes Gannoun [Elements] added a comment - Hello everyone! I'm Elyes, a Product Manager at Elements Apps Following up my comment on JSDCLOUD-4328 , you can use Elements Overview , to answer this use case very easily. You can configure an overview that displays the assignee of "related" issues on other issues or on the customers portal. We can configure an overview based on the current issue key, which results in displaying additional information on the portal of the request (like the assignee) Don't hesitate to try it out

            Nathan Ell added a comment -

            In my unique case, I used a workaround of just commenting on tickets with the assignee name using this Automation formula:

            • When issue is assigned
            • Stop processing if issue is not in a relevant status
            • If
              • Issue is unassigned: add comment that issue has been unassigned
              • Issue is assigned: add comment that issue has been assigned to <the assignee>

            In my situation this has worked well to show assignee updates when in a relevant set of statuses.

            Nathan Ell added a comment - In my unique case, I used a workaround of just commenting on tickets with the assignee name using this Automation formula: When issue is assigned Stop processing if issue is not in a relevant status If Issue is unassigned: add comment that issue has been unassigned Issue is assigned: add comment that issue has been assigned to <the assignee> In my situation this has worked well to show assignee updates when in a relevant set of statuses.

            I just checked out that workaround add on and it seems sketchy.  Reviews point to security issues with no responses from the creator, and I don't think it should be recommended.

            Dena Campasano added a comment - I just checked out that workaround add on and it seems sketchy.  Reviews point to security issues with no responses from the creator, and I don't think it should be recommended.

            +1 PLEASE!

            ian.johnsen added a comment - +1 PLEASE!

            Please add this feature!! Definitely an ease of use feature

            jeriel.lantigua added a comment - Please add this feature!! Definitely an ease of use feature

            We also have an automation that notifies the reporter of assignment of a ticket.  However, this runs once on first assignment, and a ticket may change hands.  It's nice for the customer to know who their contact is for a ticket.

            Dena Campasano added a comment - We also have an automation that notifies the reporter of assignment of a ticket.  However, this runs once on first assignment, and a ticket may change hands.  It's nice for the customer to know who their contact is for a ticket.

            How is this not a function in service desk portal? Your workaround is a terrible idea for users to install some unknown marketplace app that doesn't work and This app is not part of the Marketplace Bug Bounty program. This partner has not completed the Security Self-Assessment Program.

            Kevin Manson added a comment - How is this not a function in service desk portal? Your workaround is a terrible idea for users to install some unknown marketplace app that doesn't work and This app is not part of the Marketplace Bug Bounty program. This partner has not completed the Security Self-Assessment Program.

            Once again, yes please

            Yatish Madhav added a comment - Once again, yes please

            We have to use an automation script to add comment for client when an issue gets assigned.

            Viacheslav Dobromyslov added a comment - We have to use an automation script to add comment for client when an issue gets assigned.

            Alex M added a comment -

            It shouldn't be difficult. Default Off with an option in the project settings for Service Management products to display the assigned agent in the Portal view. Can't think of any more of a simple feature to add or anything less intrusive.

            Alex M added a comment - It shouldn't be difficult. Default Off with an option in the project settings for Service Management products to display the assigned agent in the Portal view. Can't think of any more of a simple feature to add or anything less intrusive.

            Sushant, this has dragged on for eight and a half years. Could you please provide a timeframe for resolution? Thank you!

            Tom Schmidt added a comment - Sushant, this has dragged on for eight and a half years. Could you please provide a timeframe for resolution? Thank you!

            Any update on this? Its more than a Year there is no update. Kindly update the current status of this.

            siddharth.sahoo@firstapex.com added a comment - Any update on this? Its more than a Year there is no update. Kindly update the current status of this.

            This is very necessary – staff doesn't know who is working on their tickets or who to follow up with when the ticket sits forever.

            v.stephanie.gomes added a comment - This is very necessary – staff doesn't know who is working on their tickets or who to follow up with when the ticket sits forever.

            definitely NEEDED ... +1 from me

            this is something we have been after since inception of Jira SM at our company since 2017

            JOSEPH DELAI added a comment - definitely NEEDED ... +1 from me this is something we have been after since inception of Jira SM at our company since 2017

            +1

            +1

            I guess I had assumed that the requestor would see who was assigned to their ticket already. I think it's helpful for them to know that information.

            Linda Watson added a comment - I guess I had assumed that the requestor would see who was assigned to their ticket already. I think it's helpful for them to know that information.

            I think having it switchable would be the way to go.
            Some contexts you may want to see the assignee (small-ish internal service desk), others you would want it hidden (giant telco with angry customers)
            Having it switchable per project would be great

            Michael Clarke added a comment - I think having it switchable would be the way to go. Some contexts you may want to see the assignee (small-ish internal service desk), others you would want it hidden (giant telco with angry customers) Having it switchable per project would be great

            This would be very useful +1 from me

            Jamie Cornish added a comment - This would be very useful +1 from me

            +1

            +1

            Nick Dring added a comment - +1

            It will soon be a decade since this request was open

            Created: 13/Feb/2014 4:34 PM

            Ivan Filipov added a comment - It will soon be a decade since this request was open Created: 13/Feb/2014 4:34 PM

            Alex M added a comment -

            Adding support. Seems counter-intuitive that you can view all request participants but not the agent who's assigned to the ticket.

            Our team is constantly having to inform customers they don't need to add the agent they're working with to the request participants.

            Alex M added a comment - Adding support. Seems counter-intuitive that you can view all request participants but not the agent who's assigned to the ticket. Our team is constantly having to inform customers they don't need to add the agent they're working with to the request participants.

            +1 ... desperately need this and think its such a key feature to add a personal touch

            Mark Murray added a comment - +1 ... desperately need this and think its such a key feature to add a personal touch

            +1 ... I can't remember if I commented here before. Is there any work around or progress on this, please? Thank you.

            Yatish Madhav added a comment - +1 ... I can't remember if I commented here before. Is there any work around or progress on this, please? Thank you.

            +1 please allow option to show Assignee on portal tickets.

            ian.johnsen added a comment - +1 please allow option to show Assignee on portal tickets.

            Hi all,

            In case you need to display Reporter or Assignee information from your IdP (Azure AD, Okta, OneLogin) in Jira issues or in the Service Management Requests (via portal) to speed up ticket resolution and give more information to agents, there is MindPro Sync. The app is for Cloud and also shows the user hierarchy and set approvers automatically based on the hierarchy. Here is the link: https://marketplace.atlassian.com/apps/1226659/mindpro-sync-okta-azure-onelogin-attributes-in-jira?hosting=cloud&tab=overview

            Eduardo Anflor - MindPro added a comment - Hi all, In case you need to display Reporter or Assignee information from your IdP (Azure AD, Okta, OneLogin) in Jira issues or in the Service Management Requests (via portal) to speed up ticket resolution and give more information to agents, there is MindPro Sync. The app is for Cloud and also shows the user hierarchy and set approvers automatically based on the hierarchy. Here is the link: https://marketplace.atlassian.com/apps/1226659/mindpro-sync-okta-azure-onelogin-attributes-in-jira?hosting=cloud&tab=overview

            +1.  Is there also a suggestion for the Request Participants field to be shown on the customer portal?

            Rich Epstein added a comment - +1.  Is there also a suggestion for the Request Participants field to be shown on the customer portal?

            +1

            Karen Bautista added a comment - +1

            +1

            josue.leal added a comment - +1

            +1

            This has a daily impact on workload. Because users can't see who's working on their stuff they make duplicate tickets ALL. THE. TIME. Duplicate tickets slow down all the tickets.

            Tom Schmidt added a comment - This has a daily impact on workload. Because users can't see who's working on their stuff they make duplicate tickets ALL. THE. TIME. Duplicate tickets slow down all the tickets.

            @erinblomert: Thanks for pointing this out.

             

            @JIRA: Clearly there's another reason you're not telling people as to why the assignee isn't available on the Request itself but viewable in the Request area.

             

            Devin Ponda added a comment - @erinblomert: Thanks for pointing this out.   @JIRA: Clearly there's another reason you're not telling people as to why the assignee isn't available on the Request itself but viewable in the Request area.  

            Hey all,  here's a small workaround - If you go on the portal and click "Requests" and then "Customize' on the right hand side of the screen, you can choose which columns the customer sees when they are searching their requests.  It's possible to add "Assignee" as a column there, even if it does not show up on the ticket.

            Erin Blomert added a comment - Hey all,  here's a small workaround - If you go on the portal and click "Requests" and then "Customize' on the right hand side of the screen, you can choose which columns the customer sees when they are searching their requests.  It's possible to add "Assignee" as a column there, even if it does not show up on the ticket.

            +1

            Devin Ponda added a comment - +1

            Needed.  users complain

            David Hopkins added a comment - Needed.  users complain

            +1

            Mark Murray added a comment - +1

            +1

            Andrey Ivanov added a comment - +1

            +1

            aman.singh added a comment - +1

            +1 PLEASE

            ian.johnsen added a comment - +1 PLEASE

            +1 How can you provide a top notch customer experience without exposing who the HUMAN is you're working with?  Take a serious look at adding this please.

            jamesvoight added a comment - +1 How can you provide a top notch customer experience without exposing who the HUMAN is you're working with?  Take a serious look at adding this please.

            +1 Why is this not already a thing?

            Drew Taylor added a comment - +1 Why is this not already a thing?

            +1

            Our users request this feature

            Hope we see Assignee on Portal Т_Т

            Andrei Rogozin-Kaminsky added a comment - +1 Our users request this feature Hope we see Assignee on Portal Т_Т

            Ivan added a comment -

            +1 We also need this option. Thanks

            Ivan added a comment - +1 We also need this option. Thanks

            Great answer, Sushant...just great. This thread originates from 2014. Really impressive.

            Ivan Filipov added a comment - Great answer, Sushant...just great. This thread originates from 2014. Really impressive.

            Hello everyone,

            Thank you for sharing this feedback and following this ticket.

            We evaluated this ticket and understand that we need to provide the ability to show assigned agent on Portal. However, we will not be able to prioritise this at the moment as there are other items in the short term roadmap which are higher priority. We will definitely get back to you once we pick this up in our short term roadmap.

            Sushant, Product Manager, JSM

            Sushant Koshy added a comment - Hello everyone, Thank you for sharing this feedback and following this ticket. We evaluated this ticket and understand that we need to provide the ability to show assigned agent on Portal. However, we will not be able to prioritise this at the moment as there are other items in the short term roadmap which are higher priority. We will definitely get back to you once we pick this up in our short term roadmap. Sushant, Product Manager, JSM

            Zhi-Xian Goh added a comment - - edited

            +1 for this.

             I have a team of Agents whose internal customers tend to chase on the follow up of the request status. So if they have no idea who is the assigned Agent tending to the request at the moment, they ended up spending too much time barking up the wrong tree.

             

             Ideally displayed in the View Request Screen as well

            Zhi-Xian Goh added a comment - - edited +1 for this.  I have a team of Agents whose internal customers tend to chase on the follow up of the request status. So if they have no idea who is the assigned Agent tending to the request at the moment, they ended up spending too much time barking up the wrong tree.    Ideally displayed in the View Request Screen as well

            +1 for this. Also using Jira and SD internally and this is important.

             

            Ivan Filipov added a comment - +1 for this. Also using Jira and SD internally and this is important.  

            +1

            We use Jira Service Management internally so this feature would be really great for our teams to know who is handling their request!

            Zak Linder added a comment - +1 We use Jira Service Management internally so this feature would be really great for our teams to know who is handling their request!

            +1 for this.

            I'm not sure what all the best practise non-sense is about not showing the assignee to the customer (that I've read on some community posts). If you're only using JIRA internally, it makes total sense to display the assignee. 

            Definitely this should be available OOB, different organisations use JIRA in different ways and should be afforded the flexibility to do so.

            Best,

            Mark

            Mark O'Shea added a comment - +1 for this. I'm not sure what all the best practise non-sense is about not showing the assignee to the customer (that I've read on some community posts). If you're only using JIRA internally, it makes total sense to display the assignee.  Definitely this should be available OOB, different organisations use JIRA in different ways and should be afforded the flexibility to do so. Best, Mark

            I'm quite suprised this simple yet fundamental variable hasn't been developed ... Please get this sorted out.

            Kristian Rossing Christensen added a comment - I'm quite suprised this simple yet fundamental variable hasn't been developed ... Please get this sorted out.

            This is a joke that this doesn't exist on such a widely used Service platform.

             

            Travis Jowell added a comment - This is a joke that this doesn't exist on such a widely used Service platform.  

            This is a very basic option if the Jira service desk was intended to be used by external customers.

            Arpit Rathore added a comment - This is a very basic option if the Jira service desk was intended to be used by external customers.

            This feature is now part of the Feature Bundle addon. It's a commercial app.

            Tom Jones [Appsvio] added a comment - This feature is now part of the Feature Bundle addon. It's a commercial app.

            Ricardo N added a comment -

            Ricardo N added a comment - https://getsupport.atlassian.com/browse/PSCLOUD-52160

            I agree with all the previous comments. How many more votes are needed by Atlassian to make this a priority? It has been hovering between 18 and 19 in the priority list. How can this be escalated?

            Khalid Tariq added a comment - I agree with all the previous comments. How many more votes are needed by Atlassian to make this a priority? It has been hovering between 18 and 19 in the priority list. How can this be escalated?

            Why can't the assignee act like the reporter and the request participants? They show on the form. I don't understand why it doesn't show? This is a Joke or what?

            Wendy Thorneloe added a comment - Why can't the assignee act like the reporter and the request participants? They show on the form. I don't understand why it doesn't show? This is a Joke or what?

            Gavin Joye added a comment -

            Jira Service Desk has so many pieces that can be customized, I don't understand why the customer portal cannot be customized.  Not only should the assigned tech be visible, but we should be able to toggle fields on or off - custom and built-in.  How hard can it be to add read-only fields to the sidebar?

            I mean, at least let us customize it with a Jira Screen.  Honestly, even just a basic solution should be extremely simple to do for now.

            Gavin Joye added a comment - Jira Service Desk has so many pieces that can be customized, I don't understand why the customer portal cannot be customized.  Not only should the assigned tech be visible, but we should be able to toggle fields on or off - custom and built-in.  How hard can it be to add read-only fields to the sidebar? I mean, at least let us customize it with a Jira Screen.  Honestly, even just a basic solution should be extremely simple to do for now.

            Bastian Piroth added a comment - Our solution:  https://marketplace.atlassian.com/apps/1219320/issue-details-for-jira-service-desk?hosting=cloud&tab=overview

            This should be a very easy thing to add to the customer portal. Simply add another column and pull in the data for "assignee" for the ticket. The same information should be pulled into the individual ticket view. We sometimes have to change who the assignee is on a ticket, and the client deserves to know who their new contact is and be able to address their comments to the right person.

            If this option is not resolved in the coming 6 months, we will need to move to a different ticketing solution.

            Keeley Caverno added a comment - This should be a very easy thing to add to the customer portal. Simply add another column and pull in the data for "assignee" for the ticket. The same information should be pulled into the individual ticket view. We sometimes have to change who the assignee is on a ticket, and the client deserves to know who their new contact is and be able to address their comments to the right person. If this option is not resolved in the coming 6 months, we will need to move to a different ticketing solution.

            this request ist open since 2014...??

            Daniel Cabaco added a comment - this request ist open since 2014...??

            Yep need an add-on for EVERYTHING!

            Jay Martinsen added a comment - Yep need an add-on for EVERYTHING!

            +1

            David Russell added a comment - +1

            Hi,

            You can display Assignee on the Request Detail View thanks to using our app Extension for Jira Service Desk Cloud. Read about this feature in our documentation.

            Kate

            Katarzyna Pawlak [Deviniti] added a comment - - edited Hi, You can display Assignee on the Request Detail View thanks to using our app Extension for Jira Service Desk Cloud . Read about this feature in our documentation . Kate

            same here, this feature would surely help our customers

            Marco Ciampa added a comment - same here, this feature would surely help our customers

            Agreed, I need people coming to me about issues assigned to me otherwise I'm having to create all these automation rules to send notifications to everyone including myself rather than the end user just sending me a quick message about the issue. Actually makes more work for me not having this available.

             

            @Atlassian why is this being restricted? Is the real question.

            Jay Martinsen added a comment - Agreed, I need people coming to me about issues assigned to me otherwise I'm having to create all these automation rules to send notifications to everyone including myself rather than the end user just sending me a quick message about the issue. Actually makes more work for me not having this available.   @Atlassian why is this being restricted? Is the real question.

            Why is this not an available option? 
            Customers need to be able to see who is working on their issue so that they can follow up. 
            Using comments as a workaround is clunky and not at all intuitive. 

            Very disappointed. I hope this is fixed soon. 

            Liz Bilson added a comment - Why is this not an available option?  Customers need to be able to see who is working on their issue so that they can follow up.  Using comments as a workaround is clunky and not at all intuitive.  Very disappointed. I hope this is fixed soon. 

            Yes please, this would be real handy. +1

            Jay Martinsen added a comment - Yes please, this would be real handy. +1

            Ditto.. our customer would love this visibility surprising its not there. 

            Charlie Allen added a comment - Ditto.. our customer would love this visibility surprising its not there. 

            We would like to see this on the portal as well. 

            Rachel Forbes added a comment - We would like to see this on the portal as well. 

            We would like to see this on the portal as well. 

            Cody Stevens added a comment - We would like to see this on the portal as well. 

            We have the need also for our customers to see the assignee on the customer portal.  Thanks.

            Jodi H Test added a comment - We have the need also for our customers to see the assignee on the customer portal.  Thanks.

            In pluginExtensions for JIRA Service Desk there is an option to show Assignee in customer portal. It is shown on issue next to creator.

            Please note that this plugin is not available for Cloud instances. Hence, for Cloud, there is no workaround at all.

            Eren Aygunes added a comment - In plugin Extensions for JIRA Service Desk there is an option to show Assignee in customer portal. It is shown on issue next to creator. Please note that this plugin is not available for Cloud instances. Hence, for Cloud, there is no workaround at all.

            Daniel Bajrak added a comment - - edited

            In pluginExtensions for JIRA Service Desk there is an option to show Assignee in customer portal. It is shown on issue next to creator.

            Daniel Bajrak added a comment - - edited In plugin Extensions for JIRA Service Desk there is an option to show Assignee in customer portal. It is shown on issue next to creator.

            We would like this feature as we need more visibility towards our end-users.

            David Vogel added a comment - We would like this feature as we need more visibility towards our end-users.

            Any news on this?
            Work-around to make assignee visible to the customer?

            PS. Sry for deleting link... didn't think i'd have access to delete the link, when i'm not even allowed to visit the link.

            Kristian Dam-Jensen added a comment - Any news on this? Work-around to make assignee visible to the customer? PS. Sry for deleting link... didn't think i'd have access to delete the link, when i'm not even allowed to visit the link.

            In the current version, Why would the Assignee need to have a preset value?
            Why wouldn't it just use the project default value for Assignee when it is first created, then show the current value while being displayed?

            Shari Barchus added a comment - In the current version, Why would the Assignee need to have a preset value? Why wouldn't it just use the project default value for Assignee when it is first created, then show the current value while being displayed?

              d0d1ba410583 Sushant Koshy
              smackie@atlassian.com Shannon S
              Votes:
              752 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              387 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated: