-
Suggestion
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
834
-
96
-
NOTE: This suggestion is for JIRA Service Desk Cloud. Using JIRA Service Desk Server? See the corresponding suggestion.
Hello everyone,
I am excited to announce that this feature is currently under development. Once this feature is launched, users will have the capability to connect multiple email addresses for gathering support tickets and assign a Request Type to each connected email within every project.
I am moving the status of this ticket to 'In-Progress'. Watch this space for more updates about the release.
Manpreet Singh
PM, JSM.
Problem: A single Service Desk may have many Request Types yet only one email account can be associated with one Request Types meaning users have to use the GUI to create a Service Desk Request.
Suggestion(s): Allow multiple email address to be associated with a single Service Desk, multiple Request Types to be associated with a single email address, or holistically associate the Service Desk with one email.
- duplicates
-
JSDCLOUD-3486 Add more than 2 emails address to the Email requests
- Closed
- is duplicated by
-
JSDCLOUD-833 Allow linking of multiple email accounts with JIRA Service Desk
- Closed
-
JSDCLOUD-835 Allow linking of multiple email accounts with JIRA Service Desk
- Closed
-
JSDCLOUD-1816 As an Admin, I would like to be able to configure multiple e-mail accounts for separate request types in a service desk
- Closed
-
JSDCLOUD-2355 As a service desk admin , require multiple email configured for creating issue per service desk project.
- Closed
-
JSDCLOUD-3486 Add more than 2 emails address to the Email requests
- Closed
-
JSDCLOUD-6181 We need a way to connect multiple emails to the same help desk
- Closed
- is related to
-
JSDSERVER-798 Add the ability to configure multiple email handlers for a single Service Desk project
- Closed
-
ENT-1561 Loading...
- relates to
-
JSDCLOUD-1518 JIRA Service Desk mail handler do not have a field to choose mailbox or folder
- Not Being Considered
- mentioned in
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...