NOTE: This bug report is for JIRA Service Desk Cloud. Using JIRA Service Desk Server? See the corresponding bug report.

      Summary

      The Request Participant Field When added to the create issue Screen does not populate on the screen

      Environment

      • (Cloud) JIRA Service Desk v3.0.0-OD-04-002-D20150924T014602
      • (Cloud) JIRA Service Desk Application v3.3.0-OD-1000.663.0
      • JIRA v1000.571.2

      Steps to Reproduce

      1. Add Request Participant to the Create issue Screen on Service Desk Project
      2. Logged in as an agent, select Create issue

      Expected Results

      Request Participant Field is present on Create issue Screen

      Actual Results

      • Request Participant Field acts like a hidden field
      • Wheres My Field? Helper indicates the field is present on the screen

      Workaround

      • Set Request Participant to the edit issue Screen
      • Create issue without a Request Participant
      • Edit issue and add in a Request Participant value

      Notes:

      The same thing also happens for the Organization field.

          Form Name

            [JSDCLOUD-2428] Request Participant Missing from Create issue Screen

            I am now closing this ticket and encourage you all to vote on the linked suggestion ticket: https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/JSDCLOUD-1511

            We are aware however that it might be confusing / not intuitive and we'll look into making this information better flagged / explained (cc rreidl vwong@atlassian.com)

            Clement Capiaux (Inactive) added a comment - - edited I am now closing this ticket and encourage you all to vote on the linked suggestion ticket: https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/JSDCLOUD-1511 We are aware however that it might be confusing / not intuitive and we'll look into making this information better flagged / explained (cc rreidl   vwong@atlassian.com )

            Agreed. Its not clear why some fields have special treatment.

            Benjamin Peikes added a comment - Agreed. Its not clear why some fields have special treatment.

            roymeo added a comment -

            I'm not sure why either this or JSD-1511 hasn't been closed as a duplicate of the other.

            roymeo added a comment - I'm not sure why either this or JSD-1511 hasn't been closed as a duplicate of the other.

            Y Rossi added a comment -

            This would be a great feature to have as often we want to create a ticket and straight away inform everyone who was involved in the initial discussions. the same goes for watchers.

            Y Rossi added a comment - This would be a great feature to have as often we want to create a ticket and straight away inform everyone who was involved in the initial discussions. the same goes for watchers.

            I wish this feature gets included in upcoming builds

            jennie jennie added a comment - I wish this feature gets included in upcoming builds

            PL.IS added a comment -

            I also agree that this field should be visible during creation of new issue Service Desk. Without this field we duplicate some actions, we need to go to created tickets and this participant users which generate more clicks

            PL.IS added a comment - I also agree that this field should be visible during creation of new issue Service Desk. Without this field we duplicate some actions, we need to go to created tickets and this participant users which generate more clicks

            That's something we absolutely need in our Service Desks.
            The feature is particulary useful when we ask customers to copy their supervisor, safety controlers, the laboratory manager, etc. in the request form.
            Definitely wanted.

            Malysa Martin added a comment - That's something we absolutely need in our Service Desks. The feature is particulary useful when we ask customers to copy their supervisor, safety controlers, the laboratory manager, etc. in the request form. Definitely wanted.

            Hi mmcmahon, I understand that this functionality wasn't within original scope, and while I'm not sure why (if it looks like a field and acts like a field, why not show it on the screen like any other field?) I won't debate that. However, in that case can the "Where is my field" and\or documentation be updated to let people know that this isn't a normal field?

            Haddon Fisher added a comment - Hi mmcmahon , I understand that this functionality wasn't within original scope, and while I'm not sure why (if it looks like a field and acts like a field, why not show it on the screen like any other field?) I won't debate that. However, in that case can the "Where is my field" and\or documentation be updated to let people know that this isn't a normal field?

            Hi emccutcheon

            This feature was not within the original scope of Request Participants.

            We acknowledge that it would be desirable for it to be possible to include in a Create Issue Screen, however, as it is not a bug with existing functionality, I will move to a Suggestion and encourage users to vote for the issue.

            Regards
            Matt
            JIRA Service Desk developer

            Matthew McMahon (Inactive) added a comment - Hi emccutcheon This feature was not within the original scope of Request Participants. We acknowledge that it would be desirable for it to be possible to include in a Create Issue Screen, however, as it is not a bug with existing functionality, I will move to a Suggestion and encourage users to vote for the issue. Regards Matt JIRA Service Desk developer

              Unassigned Unassigned
              emccutcheon Earl McCutcheon
              Affected customers:
              33 This affects my team
              Watchers:
              36 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: