https://getsupport.atlassian.com/browse/CES-52272

Bug still there, just tried 

Hello!

We’re looking to improve the import experience in Jira and are keen to understand how our community is using the Jira Import Module (JIM). If you’ve used JIM to migrate/move data into Jira recently, we’d love to hear about your experience. Please take a few minutes to fill out this survey. Your feedback will help us learn how we can improve your experience in importing data.

Survey link - https://forms.gle/NYNkmS92r96z42QV9

Thanks!

Prashanth M
Product Manager, Jira Platform

As Jira user, I need to multiply their figures by 60, in order to get the right "time estimate"...

As Jira admin, this problem is not happening.

You'll be able to work around the default 'Minutes' setting in Time Tracking if you multiply the hours entry on your CSV file by 216000. So, 1 hour = 216000 on your CSV file.

Possible workarounds reported by developers at my company:

Using the import from CSV option in the Jira admin console to import CSV is working fine. Original Estimates and Time Remaining are coming in as expected.

And, if we give Original Estimates and Time Remaining in milliseconds (instead of seconds) and then use import option available under “Issues and filters” then it works. Original Estimates and Time Remaining come in as expected.

So conclusion is, if we use

• Import CSV option under Jira admin console then we need to provide Original Estimates and Time Remaining in seconds.
• For the Import CSV option under Issues and filters we need to provide Original Estimates and Time Remaining in milliseconds.

This also occurs in Jira Server.
I understand that there is a workaround, but please correct it as it is inconvenient.

Oh ... just the same comments were on.

for the proposal, which includes an initial comparison of the two licenses.

I like the table - it makes the differences and similarities quite clear.

I have one nitpick on the comparison: For “other versions” it states
for the GPL:

“Compliance with any version automatically permitted if no version
specified; otherwise no by default, but licensor may specify that
later/other versions allowable. No additional obligations are
imposed on authors where a reuser follows a later version. (§§14)”

It would be nice to add, that the suggested license text allows any
later version, and that there is an option to select a proxy who can
decide for each later version whether the works may be used under this
version (clause 14). Additionally clause 13 allows using the AGPL
(which is a GPL with added copyleft protection for applications which
are accessed over the network - a requirement for providing copyleft
in remote services).,,,,

The possibility to use CC by-sa licensed works together with GPL
licensed works to form a derivative work of both would make my life a
lot easier.

It would allow me to use works from Ryzoom together with works from
Battle for Wesnoth in the free RPG books I work on.

And it would make it easier to work on the writings, the artwork and
the code for a game which uses the rules of the RPG for a tactical
computer-RPG without having to worry about falling into licensing
traps.

Finally I could license my own drawings and poems under CC by-sa,
which would make it much easier for others to reuse them, while
preserving my ability combine all derivatives of my works with my
other works - regardless of the kind of work (song, image, text or
program - the latter two often require the GPL to preserve the
possibility to reuse the improvements made to derivative in practice).

Now know where I stand - I hope I can contribute to making the
compatibility of CC attribution-sharealike and GPLv3 or later work
out!

Best wishes,
Arne
–
singing a part of the history of free software,,?