• Icon: Bug Bug
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Icon: Medium Medium
    • 3.0.3
    • 1.9.5.0
    • Git
    • None
    • OS Windows 10

      Bitbucket.org

    • Severity 1 - Critical

      I can no longer select the files I want to commit using checkboxes. The checkboxes are missing! Why?

            [SRCTREEWIN-5947] Checkbox missing for unstaged files

            Monique Khairuliana (Inactive) made changes -
            Workflow Original: JAC Bug Workflow v3 [ 3455486 ] New: SRCTREE JAC Bug Workflow [ 3743837 ]
            Monique Khairuliana (Inactive) made changes -
            Workflow Original: SourceTree Bug Workflow [ 1581898 ] New: JAC Bug Workflow v3 [ 3455486 ]
            Status Original: Resolved [ 5 ] New: Closed [ 6 ]

            Craig Smith added a comment - - edited

            I agree with Andreas.  This is a common issue with interface design.

            Very happy to see it back though.  I've been putting off upgrading from v1.7 mostly for this reason... and a couple of others I've forgotten about it's been so long.

            Craig Smith added a comment - - edited I agree with Andreas.  This is a common issue with interface design. Very happy to see it back though.  I've been putting off upgrading from v1.7 mostly for this reason... and a couple of others I've forgotten about it's been so long.

            amaly added a comment - - edited

            Thank you for the "+/-" buttons for staging and unstaging. That is already a huge improvement on the former checkboxes gone missing. 

            Not particularly wanting to be nitpicking, but having the "+/-" buttons to the left of the filename would be a huge improvement over having them on the right of the filename. Having the buttons right-aligned potentially (depending on screen size, window layout, ...) puts a lot of whitespace between the filename and the button, making it hard to associate the filename with the correct "+/-" button if you have a lot of changed files.

            amaly added a comment - - edited Thank you for the "+/-" buttons for staging and unstaging. That is already a huge improvement on the former checkboxes gone missing.  Not particularly wanting to be nitpicking, but having the "+/-" buttons to the left of the filename would be a huge improvement over having them on the right of the filename. Having the buttons right-aligned potentially (depending on screen size, window layout, ...) puts a lot of whitespace between the filename and the button, making it hard to associate the filename with the correct "+/-" button if you have a lot of changed files.
            Mike Corsaro (Inactive) made changes -
            Fix Version/s New: 3.0.3 [ 82092 ]
            Resolution New: Fixed [ 1 ]
            Status Original: Verified [ 10005 ] New: Resolved [ 5 ]

            3.0 includes stage/unstage "+/-" buttons.

            Mike Corsaro (Inactive) added a comment - 3.0 includes stage/unstage "+/-" buttons.

            So is this ever going to get fixed? Last I checked Sourcetree on MacOS still had the checkboxes and I use them ALL THE TIME.

            Unfortunately Sourcetree on my Windows machine does not have the checkboxes anymore.

            Please just bring back the checkboxes. Or at least provide the OPTION of using checkboxes. I know this was some sort of UX or design decision, but you should not just simply kill a feature that obviously many people used. At least provide the option to turn checkboxes back on.

            Jake Wilson added a comment - So is this ever going to get fixed? Last I checked Sourcetree on MacOS still had the checkboxes and I use them ALL THE TIME. Unfortunately Sourcetree on my Windows machine does not have the checkboxes anymore. Please just bring back the checkboxes. Or at least provide the OPTION of using checkboxes. I know this was some sort of UX or design decision, but you should not just simply kill a feature that obviously many people used. At least provide the option to turn checkboxes back on.

            lumenetix added a comment -

            wow... since when programers are allowed to remove features like this one without replacement?! That simply mean that the replacement for the, albeit awkward but useful feature, was not ready.

            Somebody approved this and should not have is or her donuts at the next Friday happy hour... 

            lumenetix added a comment - wow... since when programers are allowed to remove features like this one without replacement?! That simply mean that the replacement for the, albeit awkward but useful feature, was not ready. Somebody approved this and should not have is or her donuts at the next Friday happy hour... 

            Peter Hinz added a comment -

            Just bring back the old interface. It was working 100%

            Peter Hinz added a comment - Just bring back the old interface. It was working 100%
            Jan Drozen made changes -
            Link New: This issue is related to SRCTREEWIN-7211 [ SRCTREEWIN-7211 ]

              Unassigned Unassigned
              77be48e0e07e Jogchem Andre Oord
              Affected customers:
              44 This affects my team
              Watchers:
              51 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: