Loading...

XML

Word

Printable

Details

Type: Suggestion
Resolution: Tracked Elsewhere
Component/s: Classic - Boards
Labels:
- affects-server

Feedback Policy:

Our product teams collect and evaluate feedback from a number of different sources. To learn more about how we use customer feedback in the planning process, check out our new feature policy.

Description

NOTE: This suggestion is for JIRA Software Cloud. Using JIRA Software Server? See the corresponding suggestion.

From docens of requests and comments concerning Rapid Board deficiencies on this web site - and from various discussions with other JIRA stakeholders and other customers, I know that this is a very serious issue.

The Rapid Board has moved out of labs way to early for many customers.

This request is meant to gather the MUST HAVE requirements that would make us customers wanting to move to the Rapid Board.

Dear Atlassian, please see this request as a chance to make Rapid Board a really big success. This request is an offer to give our best support to achieve that common goal.

Thank you.

Attachments

- Sort By Name
- Sort By Date
- Ascending
- Descending
- Thumbnails
- List

screenshot-1.jpg
114 kB
07/Mar/2013 3:03 PM
Great core values!.jpg
106 kB
04/Dec/2012 12:56 PM

Issue Links

is detailed by

JSWCLOUD-3474 As a Rapid Board user I would like to configure the detail view for an issue

Closed

JSWCLOUD-3922 As a user, I would like to configure the cards displayed in the rapid board

Closed

JSWCLOUD-5035 As a JIRA/GH administrator, I would like to be able to specify who is allowed to create and start a sprint independently from the "Administer Projects" JIRA permission

Closed

JSWCLOUD-5117 Greenhopper non-working days are ignored in Rapid Views

Closed

JSWCLOUD-5345 Add GreenHopper gadgets to the dashboard that tie to the Rapid Board

Closed

JSWCLOUD-5678 As a user, I would like to set up a Version Hierarchy on the new board

Closed

JSWCLOUD-6020 As a scrum planner I would like the ability to reorder sprints

Closed

JSWCLOUD-6626 As a JIRA system admin I want to decide, if the GreenHopper UI supports Epics or not

Closed

JSWCLOUD-6677 As a JIRA system admin I want to decide, if the GreenHopper UI supports "Simplified Workflows" or not

Closed

JSWCLOUD-6714 As a Rapid Board user i would like a compact UI displaying as many cards as the classic board can

Closed

JSWCLOUD-6753 As a JIRA system admin I want to decide, if my users see GreenHopper Classic, RapidBoard or both in the JIRA UI

Closed

JSWCLOUD-6789 Please remove message "The Classic boards are no longer being actively improved ..."

Closed

JSWCLOUD-7446 View on board function not available for Classic Board Greenhopper

Closed

JSWCLOUD-7467 As a rapid board user, able to rank sub-task in Plan mode

Closed

JSWCLOUD-8003 Epic in Two Dimensional Filter Statistics

Closed

JSWCLOUD-9167 Sum estimates from sub-tasks in user stories

Closed

JSWCLOUD-9587 Add the ability to specify multiple board administrators so other users can change the configuration (delegated admin)

Closed

JSWCLOUD-13138 Sum estimates from sub-tasks in user stories

Closed

JSWCLOUD-5200 As a user, I would like to be able to change the size of cards on the Rapid Board

Gathering Interest

JSWCLOUD-6790 As a Scrum Master I would like to use a predefined template for my Agile Board

Gathering Interest

JSWCLOUD-3681 Ability to have cell (column and swimlane) min/max constraints

Future Consideration

is related to

JSWSERVER-6754 As an Atlassian (enterprise) customer I request that Rapid Board fulfills some MUST HAVE requirements

Closed

relates to

JSWCLOUD-6828 As a Classic user I would like my epic-issue relationships migrated for use on the new boards

Closed

(16 is detailed by, 1 is related to, 1 relates to)

Activity

People

Assignee:: Unassigned

Reporter:: rainer mueck

Votes:: 142 Vote for this issue

Watchers:: 101 Start watching this issue

Dates

Created:: 23/Nov/2012 2:08 PM

Updated:: 19/Sep/2019 6:11 AM

Resolved:: 01/Jul/2014 4:52 AM