-
Suggestion
-
Resolution: Low Engagement
-
None
-
None
NOTE: This suggestion is for Jira Service Desk Server. Using Jira Service Desk Cloud? See the corresponding suggestion.
Problem Definition
Since Jira Service Desk CSAT (customer satisfaction) system currently permits users to re-submit their satisfaction star ratings multiple times (see also JSDSERVER-3839 ), Jira should be able to track these changes from a historical perspective. Currently this is not possible. Since the data is being stored on a custom field, as soon as the customer changes their star rating, that value overwrites the previous data for that interaction.
While the issue history in Jira does indicate the date/time of a satisfaction rating was provided, it does not track what that rating was.
In turn these original ratings are lost.
Suggested Solution
Track the historical rating values in some manner. Either in the issue history, or when viewing the changelog of the issue via the API, this information would be useful to be able to store and retrieve.
Why this is important
It is possible for a customer to incorrectly update the wrong request, or worse update all their previous requests and change these values. This provides a very skewed CSAT values if done, and does not accurately reflect the original CSAT ratings given initial provided
Workaround
None
- derived from
-
JSDSERVER-3839 Customer satisfaction surveys allow customers to re-submit their scores multiple times
- Closed
- was cloned as
-
JSDCLOUD-9076 Service Desk Satisfaction ratings (CSAT) should be tracked historically
- Closed
Form Name |
---|
[JSDSERVER-6827] Service Desk Satisfaction ratings (CSAT) should be tracked historically
Resolution | New: Low Engagement [ 10300 ] | |
Status | Original: Gathering Interest [ 11772 ] | New: Closed [ 6 ] |
Description |
Original:
h3. Problem Definition
Since Jira Service Desk CSAT (customer satisfaction) system currently permits users to re-submit their satisfaction star ratings multiple times (see also While the issue history in Jira does indicate the date/time of a satisfaction rating was provided, it does not track what that rating was. In turn these original ratings are lost. h3. Suggested Solution Track the historical rating values in some manner. Either in the issue history, or when viewing the changelog of the issue via the API, this information would be useful to be able to store and retrieve. h3. Why this is important It is possible for a customer to incorrectly update the wrong request, or worse update all their previous requests and change these values. This provides a very skewed CSAT values if done, and does not accurately reflect the original CSAT ratings given initial provided h3. Workaround None |
New:
{panel:bgColor=#e7f4fa}
*NOTE:* This suggestion is for *Jira Service Desk Server*. Using *Jira Service Desk Cloud*? [See the corresponding suggestion|http://jira.atlassian.com/browse/JSDCLOUD-9076]. {panel} h3. Problem Definition Since Jira Service Desk CSAT (customer satisfaction) system currently permits users to re-submit their satisfaction star ratings multiple times (see also While the issue history in Jira does indicate the date/time of a satisfaction rating was provided, it does not track what that rating was. In turn these original ratings are lost. h3. Suggested Solution Track the historical rating values in some manner. Either in the issue history, or when viewing the changelog of the issue via the API, this information would be useful to be able to store and retrieve. h3. Why this is important It is possible for a customer to incorrectly update the wrong request, or worse update all their previous requests and change these values. This provides a very skewed CSAT values if done, and does not accurately reflect the original CSAT ratings given initial provided h3. Workaround None |
Link |
New:
This issue was cloned as |
Link |
New:
This issue derived from |
Hi,
Thank you for raising and watching this suggestion. We regret to inform you that due to limited demand, we have no plans to implement it in the foreseeable future. In order to set expectations, we're closing this request.
This is an automated update triggered by low engagement with this suggestion (number of votes, number of watchers).
We hope you will appreciate our candid communication and our attempts to become more transparent about our priorities. You can read more about our approach to highly voted suggestions here, and how we prioritise what to implement here.
To learn more about our recent investments in Jira Service Management and Data Center, please check our public roadmap and our two dashboards containing recently resolved issues, and current work and future plans.
Regards,
Charlie
Jira Service Management, Server & Data Center