• Icon: Suggestion Suggestion
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • None
    • Issue View
    • 15
    • 2
    • We collect Jira Service Desk feedback from various sources, and we evaluate what we've collected when planning our product roadmap. To understand how this piece of feedback will be reviewed, see our Implementation of New Features Policy.

      NOTE: This suggestion is for JIRA Service Desk Server. Using JIRA Service Desk Cloud? See the corresponding suggestion.

      Currently, Customer Request type field is locked in Jira and cannot be used as mandatory when moving ticket or other issue actions.

      Even when it gets unlocked within the database and when set as required, customers won't be able to create ticket, as the Customer Request type will get validated as required even before the ticket gets created.

      It would be useful if we could have functionality to make Customer Request type field required out of the box (without the need to unlock field in database etc).

          Form Name

            [JSDSERVER-6110] Possibility to make Customer Request type required when moving ticket

            We need as well the possibility to make it required especially when agents create tickets for customers.
            Several reports filter on customer request type!

            Ladislav Peti added a comment - We need as well the possibility to make it required especially when agents create tickets for customers. Several reports filter on customer request type!

            Florian Schomakers added a comment - - edited

            100% agree with Michelle de Bruijns comment. Its very important to get sure the notifications are send correctly. Especially for SLA agreements or customer experiencing our services.
            I found a solution to set it as default but this only works inside the cloud not for server installations... 
            https://confluence.atlassian.com/jirakb/automatically-set-customer-request-type-when-issue-is-created-via-jira-1026039858.html

             Edit: 
            Found an article about the same workflow for Server but this is not working in our environment.
            https://confluence.atlassian.com/jirakb/customer-request-type-displays-no-match-in-jira-859463969.html

            Is anyone using this?

            Florian Schomakers added a comment - - edited 100% agree with Michelle de Bruijns comment. Its very important to get sure the notifications are send correctly. Especially for SLA agreements or customer experiencing our services. I found a solution to set it as default but this only works inside the cloud not for server installations...  https://confluence.atlassian.com/jirakb/automatically-set-customer-request-type-when-issue-is-created-via-jira-1026039858.html  Edit:  Found an article about the same workflow for Server but this is not working in our environment. https://confluence.atlassian.com/jirakb/customer-request-type-displays-no-match-in-jira-859463969.html Is anyone using this?

            We would also like to have this feature implemented, not only for the purpose of moving the issue: for some of our agents it is common to create tickets for their customers outside of the portal / Channel Jira. Although Customer request type can be made available on the Create screen, it cannot be made mandatory. Sometimes agents forget to set the field. As a result, tickets without a Customer Request Type are not visible in queues as expected by the service desk teams, and notification for ticket participants is failing in these cases. As a workaround we use automation rules....  Our agents need support in making these, and these rules are in constant need of maintenance. 

            Making Customer Request Type mandatory in the Create screen form the Jira channel, would save us the work we have on automation rules, would lower the number of 'disappeared/forgotten' tickets and results in better notification for Participants. 

            Michelle de Bruijn added a comment - We would also like to have this feature implemented, not only for the purpose of moving the issue: for some of our agents it is common to create tickets for their customers outside of the portal / Channel Jira. Although Customer request type can be made available on the Create screen, it cannot be made mandatory. Sometimes agents forget to set the field. As a result, tickets without a Customer Request Type are not visible in queues as expected by the service desk teams, and notification for ticket participants is failing in these cases. As a workaround we use automation rules....  Our agents need support in making these, and these rules are in constant need of maintenance.  Making Customer Request Type mandatory in the Create screen form the Jira channel, would save us the work we have on automation rules, would lower the number of 'disappeared/forgotten' tickets and results in better notification for Participants. 

            Hello,

            We need this feature too as our customers can no longer see tickets if they are moved to other projects if the customer request type field is not set.

            Regards,

            Imane ASSOUD added a comment - Hello, We need this feature too as our customers can no longer see tickets if they are moved to other projects if the customer request type field is not set. Regards,

            Finally its taking attention ! 

            Milan Ardeshana added a comment - Finally its taking attention ! 

            Our team would like to have this feature implemented. When our SD Agents move tickets they often forget to also set the new request type, just clicking through the Move Wizard, that results in request type resetting to No match.

            Damir Kadyrov added a comment - Our team would like to have this feature implemented. When our SD Agents move tickets they often forget to also set the new request type, just clicking through the Move Wizard, that results in request type resetting to No match .

            Alexander Wechsler added a comment - - edited

            We would also very much appreciate the possibility to set this field as required. We are moving issues to different issuetypes (e.g. from Incident to Service Request) to use different workflows. We can't afford having complains from customers who cannot see tickets in the portal either.
            EDIT: It turns out you can still see tickets in the portal when a wrong request type is set in the ticket, but the displayed fields do not change to the new types fields.

            Alexander Wechsler added a comment - - edited We would also very much appreciate the possibility to set this field as required. We are moving issues to different issuetypes (e.g. from Incident to Service Request) to use different workflows. We can't afford having complains from customers who cannot see tickets in the portal either. EDIT: It turns out you can still see tickets in the portal when a wrong request type is set in the ticket, but the displayed fields do not change to the new types fields.

            Milan Ardeshana added a comment - - edited

            Yes Sir! it is Adaptavist Scriptrunner, Thanks for taking time and read my comment

            Milan Ardeshana added a comment - - edited Yes Sir! it is Adaptavist Scriptrunner, Thanks for taking time and read my comment

            Milan Ardeshana - what behavioural plugin did you use?

            Tim Patrick added a comment - Milan Ardeshana - what behavioural plugin did you use?

            I have two projects Project A and Project B

            Both projects have been configured using behaviourous plugin to have the field mandatory, as this field can't be marked as REQUIRED from field configuration.

            Now when ticket gets created or edited, its enforcing to have value other than null.

            Now we keep moving ticket so frequent between projects, atleast 100 tickets in a day. And in both projects new tickets have values but once ticket moves, person who moves the ticket is always in hurry and press next-> next -> next> and Move. In between screen he forgets to update the field customer request type as behaviourous not able to cover issue move event.

            Problem we face due to this:
            Out in customer portal those tickets are missing in customer account although customer has access to both projects and also when it comes to approval stages, because Request type is not defined, Approvers don't get emails as we use variable, ${request.url} ${request.status} ${approval.buttons} in customer notification where request is null because Person who moved ticket forgot to update value while moving ticket.

            We need solution for this as we can't afford having complains of atleast 20 customers daily they dont see tickets they created in their account.

            Milan Ardeshana added a comment - I have two projects Project A and Project B Both projects have been configured using behaviourous plugin to have the field mandatory, as this field can't be marked as REQUIRED from field configuration. Now when ticket gets created or edited, its enforcing to have value other than null. Now we keep moving ticket so frequent between projects, atleast 100 tickets in a day. And in both projects new tickets have values but once ticket moves, person who moves the ticket is always in hurry and press next-> next -> next> and Move. In between screen he forgets to update the field customer request type as behaviourous not able to cover issue move event. Problem we face due to this: Out in customer portal those tickets are missing in customer account although customer has access to both projects and also when it comes to approval stages, because Request type is not defined, Approvers don't get emails as we use variable, ${request.url} ${request.status} ${approval.buttons} in customer notification where request is null because Person who moved ticket forgot to update value while moving ticket. We need solution for this as we can't afford having complains of atleast 20 customers daily they dont see tickets they created in their account.

              Unassigned Unassigned
              mfilipan Marko Filipan
              Votes:
              103 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              55 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated: