• Icon: Suggestion Suggestion
    • Resolution: Duplicate
    • None
    • 3
    • Our product teams collect and evaluate feedback from a number of different sources. To learn more about how we use customer feedback in the planning process, check out our new feature policy.

      NOTE: This suggestion is for JIRA Cloud. Using JIRA Server? See the corresponding suggestion.

      Problem Definition

      In a similar function to Confluence, customers would like to be able to add comments to attached files on a JIRA Issue

      Suggested Solution

      Incorporate an option where Users can include comments directly on Attachments in JIRA

      Workaround

      Comments about the attachment can be added on the JIRA Issue

            [JRACLOUD-61395] Comment on Attached File in JIRA

            Anusha Rutnam added a comment - - edited
            Atlassian Update - November 2022

            As per this comment I am closing this ticket.

            If you disagree with the closing of this ticket, please add a comment here saying why and we can reopen it as needed.

            Anusha Rutnam added a comment - - edited Atlassian Update - November 2022 As per this comment I am closing this ticket. If you disagree with the closing of this ticket, please add a comment here saying why and we can reopen it as needed.

            I believe this issue is a duplicate of JRACLOUD-38871 – New HTML5 image attachment lacks possibility for comment

            I recommend that watchers of this issue vote on and watch the above issue. So that votes aren't split, I believe this ticket should be closed, but I will wait a week before taking any action in case anyone thinks both issues should continue to exist. Thank you!

            Anusha Rutnam added a comment - I believe this issue is a duplicate of JRACLOUD-38871 – New HTML5 image attachment lacks possibility for comment I recommend that watchers of this issue vote on and watch the above issue. So that votes aren't split, I believe this ticket should be closed, but I will wait a week before taking any action in case anyone thinks both issues should continue to exist. Thank you!

            Jim Johnson added a comment - - edited

            Commenting in development work flow is a "micro-task" that has a very large positive impact on productivity.
            > It is a foundational tool for promoting "connectedness" in teams, which is critical to people feeling safe and being willing to contribute.
            > Any single comment can potentially be very valuable, in terms of reducing risk, increasing utility or identifying shorter development paths, so any resistance to commenting has a large overall opportunity cost.

            So anything that makes commenting better is going to be very valuable for development productivity.

            This is not a knock on the suggested workaround, however, there is a very big difference in usability and communication at the micro-task level between commenting directly on embedded documents (as in Confluence), and commenting in the issue on an attachment (as in the suggested workaround).

            Think about (with the workaround)

            • many, many people
            • taking several extra steps to add comments,
            • having to add context to the comments,
            • having to use lots and lots of short term memory to connect the attachment to the comment in the issue,
            • experiencing many, many of events of losing focus connecting the comment to the document, and
            • many, many ideas being lost because of people not bothering with the comments because of the extra work

            Compared to:

            • many, many people with very little effort being able to directly see the connection between comments and the document, instantly understanding the context of the comment, being inspired by comments made by other people, and easily adding their own ideas as quickly as they occur, directly in the middle of the development process, using rich format documents instead of just plain text pages.

            Please give this one a high priority. You've got the technology in Confluence. It just needs to be ported over ( smiley on the "just").

            Jim Johnson added a comment - - edited Commenting in development work flow is a "micro-task" that has a very large positive impact on productivity. > It is a foundational tool for promoting "connectedness" in teams, which is critical to people feeling safe and being willing to contribute. > Any single comment can potentially be very valuable, in terms of reducing risk, increasing utility or identifying shorter development paths, so any resistance to commenting has a large overall opportunity cost. So anything that makes commenting better is going to be very valuable for development productivity. This is not a knock on the suggested workaround, however, there is a very big difference in usability and communication at the micro-task level between commenting directly on embedded documents (as in Confluence), and commenting in the issue on an attachment (as in the suggested workaround). Think about (with the workaround) many, many people taking several extra steps to add comments, having to add context to the comments, having to use lots and lots of short term memory to connect the attachment to the comment in the issue, experiencing many, many of events of losing focus connecting the comment to the document, and many, many ideas being lost because of people not bothering with the comments because of the extra work Compared to: many, many people with very little effort being able to directly see the connection between comments and the document, instantly understanding the context of the comment, being inspired by comments made by other people, and easily adding their own ideas as quickly as they occur, directly in the middle of the development process, using rich format documents instead of just plain text pages. Please give this one a high priority. You've got the technology in Confluence. It just needs to be ported over ( smiley on the "just").

              Unassigned Unassigned
              scranford Shawn C
              Votes:
              4 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              6 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: