-
Suggestion
-
Resolution: Duplicate
-
None
-
18
-
There is no ability to display a list of users managed externally via Atlassian Access against those managed otherwise (i.e. SCIM-managed vs Managed Accounts vs non-managed).
Workaround
'Export accounts' at org level to first get the list of all managed accounts, then navigate to the site level and select 'Export Users' > 'Users from selected groups only:' > Select group 'All members of directory - ...' > Download file. Then reconcile these 2 tables against each other, matching on Atlassian account ID - any users in the 'Managed accounts export' but not in 'All members of directory - ...' group are those which are not provisioned from IDP.
Suggestion
Please provide an option to display differently managed users, such as a filter in the directory
- is duplicated by
-
ACCESS-1026 Improve visibility for synced unmanaged accounts (external accounts)
- Closed
-
ACCESS-953 Identify managed accounts by their sync status in API and UI
- Gathering Interest
- is related to
-
CLOUD-11189 Better filtering and user export options for billing control
- Closed
- was cloned as
-
ACCESS-1176 Provide a way for users removed from the provisioning scope to remain active
- Closed
[ACCESS-829] Display list of users managed externally via Atlassian Access
Resolution | New: Duplicate [ 3 ] | |
Status | Original: Gathering Interest [ 11772 ] | New: Closed [ 6 ] |
Link | New: This issue is duplicated by ACCESS-953 [ ACCESS-953 ] |
Support reference count | Original: 17 | New: 18 |
Support reference count | Original: 16 | New: 17 |
Support reference count | Original: 15 | New: 16 |
Support reference count | Original: 14 | New: 15 |
Support reference count | Original: 13 | New: 14 |
Support reference count | Original: 12 | New: 13 |
Support reference count | Original: 11 | New: 12 |
Hi everyone,
Thanks for taking the time to raise this suggestion and share your use cases.
This request is currently being tracked on ACCESS-953. Please watch / vote for that ticket if it's something that you're interested in.
Thanks,
Aneita