We couldn't load all Actvitity tabs. Refresh the page to try again.
If the problem persists, contact your Jira admin.
IMPORTANT: JAC is a Public system and anyone on the internet will be able to view the data in the created JAC tickets. Please don’t include Customer or Sensitive data in the JAC ticket.
Uploaded image for project: 'Jira Software Data Center'
  1. Jira Software Data Center
  2. JSWSERVER-9645

Allow various filters (and multiple versions) in the Version Report

    • Icon: Suggestion Suggestion
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • None
    • None
    • 1
    • 3
    • We collect Jira feedback from various sources, and we evaluate what we've collected when planning our product roadmap. To understand how this piece of feedback will be reviewed, see our Implementation of New Features Policy.

      NOTE: This suggestion is for JIRA Software Server. Using JIRA Software Cloud? See the corresponding suggestion.

      This idea has been raised in both GHS-8152 ("Sub-tasks should not be included in Version Report") and GHS-9237 ("Multiple versions in version report"). However, those were each fairly specific requests, so I wanted to create an issue that might cover both of those and more.

      So, in addition to the desires stated under those other two issues, I would like to be able to constrain the version report to a filter in order to review "what if" scenarios. For example, if the release date of a version is looking to be in jeopardy, I would like to be able to quickly see what the graph would look like if we only included the remaining items of a particular priority and higher. However, I think this additional filter would still need to be scoped to 1 or more versions, and need to only exclude work that remains in an open state. Since I imagine the historical values of work completed would still need to include all items associated with the versions in order to have an accurate measure of velocity. So, the UI design for this definitely isn't immediately obvious to me, unless it was a multi-select for the version list and the choice of "Quick Filters" that only applied to Open remaining work items.

      I guess in the mean time I can temporarily move stories between versions to play with "what if's", but that feels messy.

            Loading...
            IMPORTANT: JAC is a Public system and anyone on the internet will be able to view the data in the created JAC tickets. Please don’t include Customer or Sensitive data in the JAC ticket.
            Uploaded image for project: 'Jira Software Data Center'
            1. Jira Software Data Center
            2. JSWSERVER-9645

            Allow various filters (and multiple versions) in the Version Report

              • Icon: Suggestion Suggestion
              • Resolution: Unresolved
              • None
              • None
              • 1
              • 3
              • We collect Jira feedback from various sources, and we evaluate what we've collected when planning our product roadmap. To understand how this piece of feedback will be reviewed, see our Implementation of New Features Policy.

                NOTE: This suggestion is for JIRA Software Server. Using JIRA Software Cloud? See the corresponding suggestion.

                This idea has been raised in both GHS-8152 ("Sub-tasks should not be included in Version Report") and GHS-9237 ("Multiple versions in version report"). However, those were each fairly specific requests, so I wanted to create an issue that might cover both of those and more.

                So, in addition to the desires stated under those other two issues, I would like to be able to constrain the version report to a filter in order to review "what if" scenarios. For example, if the release date of a version is looking to be in jeopardy, I would like to be able to quickly see what the graph would look like if we only included the remaining items of a particular priority and higher. However, I think this additional filter would still need to be scoped to 1 or more versions, and need to only exclude work that remains in an open state. Since I imagine the historical values of work completed would still need to include all items associated with the versions in order to have an accurate measure of velocity. So, the UI design for this definitely isn't immediately obvious to me, unless it was a multi-select for the version list and the choice of "Quick Filters" that only applied to Open remaining work items.

                I guess in the mean time I can temporarily move stories between versions to play with "what if's", but that feels messy.

                        Unassigned Unassigned
                        12dc552dc982 Pete Jaffe
                        Votes:
                        30 Vote for this issue
                        Watchers:
                        19 Start watching this issue

                          Created:
                          Updated:

                              Unassigned Unassigned
                              12dc552dc982 Pete Jaffe
                              Votes:
                              30 Vote for this issue
                              Watchers:
                              19 Start watching this issue

                                Created:
                                Updated: