Uploaded image for project: 'Jira Cloud'
  1. Jira Cloud
  2. JSWCLOUD-5200

As a user, I would like to be able to change the size of cards on the Rapid Board

    • 4
    • Our product teams collect and evaluate feedback from a number of different sources. To learn more about how we use customer feedback in the planning process, check out our new feature policy.

      Was As a user, I would like compact cards on the Rapid Board but broadening to cover requests for larger cards too.

      As a user, I cannot fit all our Rapid Board cards on my oversized screen. Moreover, my colleagues dislike scrolling with a passion!

      Please may I request compact cards for the Rapid Board. It's the only feature that's preventing our development teams from switching from the Task Board.

        1. banner-css.txt
          1.0 kB
          mrutten

          Form Name

            [JSWCLOUD-5200] As a user, I would like to be able to change the size of cards on the Rapid Board

            Atlassian Update - September 2024

            Hi everyone,

            Thank you for bringing this suggestion to our attention.

            As explained in our new features policy, there are many factors that influence our product roadmaps and determine the features we implement. When making decisions about what to prioritize and work on, we combine your feedback and suggestions with insights from our support teams, product analytics, research findings, and more. This information, combined with our medium- and long-term product and platform vision, determines what we implement and its priority order.

            Unfortunately, as a result of inactivity (no votes or comments for an extended period of time), this suggestion didn’t make it to the roadmap and we are closing it.

            While this issue has been closed, our Product Managers continue to look at requests in https://jira.atlassian.com as they develop their roadmap, including closed ones. In addition, if you feel like this suggestion is still important to your team please let us know by commenting on this ticket.

            Thank you again for providing valuable feedback to our team!

            Anusha Rutnam added a comment - Atlassian Update - September 2024 Hi everyone, Thank you for bringing this suggestion to our attention. As explained in our new features policy , there are many factors that influence our product roadmaps and determine the features we implement. When making decisions about what to prioritize and work on, we combine your feedback and suggestions with insights from our support teams, product analytics, research findings, and more. This information, combined with our medium- and long-term product and platform vision, determines what we implement and its priority order. Unfortunately, as a result of inactivity (no votes or comments for an extended period of time), this suggestion didn’t make it to the roadmap and we are closing it. While this issue has been closed, our Product Managers continue to look at requests in https://jira.atlassian.com as they develop their roadmap, including closed ones. In addition, if you feel like this suggestion is still important to your team please let us know by commenting on this ticket. Thank you again for providing valuable feedback to our team!

            +1 Would like to see vertical space be reduced

            Matt Elliott added a comment - +1 Would like to see vertical space be reduced

            Just moved from Trello and the (too big) Kanban card size is very frustrating.  I removed the fields - so why does JIRA insist on keeping the space?

            Jean Ferguson added a comment - Just moved from Trello and the (too big) Kanban card size is very frustrating.  I removed the fields - so why does JIRA insist on keeping the space?

            TomB added a comment -

            +1 for skinny card format in kanban

            TomB added a comment - +1 for skinny card format in kanban

            Martin Onis added a comment - - edited

            For making sub-tasks half-size on the boards the following css may be used:

            .ghx-subtask-group {
                display: flex;
                flex-wrap: wrap;
                padding-left:10px;
            }
              
            .ghx-has-swimlanes .ghx-subtask-group {
                padding-left:0px;
            }
            
            /* The next part may be used to give the first sub-task the full width. */
            /*
            .ghx-issue-subtask:nth-child(1) {
                margin: 0;
                width: 100%;
            }
            */
            
            .ghx-issue-subtask {
                margin-left: 0px;
                margin-right: -4px;
                width: 50%;
            }
            

            If nothing else, this may be used with Stylish.

            Martin Onis added a comment - - edited For making sub-tasks half-size on the boards the following css may be used: .ghx-subtask-group { display: flex; flex-wrap: wrap; padding-left:10px; } .ghx-has-swimlanes .ghx-subtask-group { padding-left:0px; } /* The next part may be used to give the first sub-task the full width. */ /* .ghx-issue-subtask:nth-child(1) { margin: 0; width: 100%; } */ .ghx-issue-subtask { margin-left: 0px; margin-right: -4px; width: 50%; } If nothing else, this may be used with Stylish.

            This issue was a significant reason why I chose to go with a standalone JIRA install rather than JIRA Cloud. If it wasn't for the existence of the banner hack (thank you robertbergs) it could have been a non-starter. Presentation is a feature!

            Blake Soley added a comment - This issue was a significant reason why I chose to go with a standalone JIRA install rather than JIRA Cloud. If it wasn't for the existence of the banner hack (thank you robertbergs ) it could have been a non-starter. Presentation is a feature!

            For what it's worth, I'll +1 this too

            Adrian Grayson added a comment - For what it's worth, I'll +1 this too

            It might take some time before Atlassian decides to implement this feature.

            My team has tried several options, so I hope this also helps others:

            1) Install a browser addon like Stylish or similar that allows you to override websites CSS. Create the CSS to match your liking. (disadvantage: cannot automate the distribution of new CSS changes in the team)
            2) Create a browser addon yourself that can override websites CSS. (advantage gained: possibility to automate updates of CSS in the team. disadvantage: all browser addons need to have a user account. it's preferred you don't use your private user - so the addon doesn't become obsolete once you change your job)
            3) Create your own Jira addon that overrides websites CSS (advantage gained: addon is a shared component for the team, so anybody with enough rights can work on it. We also have automated distribution of CSS in place. Possible disadvantage: on each update of CSS you need to build and deploy the addon again)

            Things to consider for number 3): In order not minimize the number of changes and deployments of the addon, put the CSS files on companies shared network drive instead of embedding it into the addon. This also means that you can have multiple folders on your shared drive, each containing CSS for different team / board, and each folder having a unique board ID as a name, so the addon will know what CSS to use per each board, by looking at the board ID.

            Good luck!

            Irena Lukin added a comment - It might take some time before Atlassian decides to implement this feature. My team has tried several options, so I hope this also helps others: 1) Install a browser addon like Stylish or similar that allows you to override websites CSS. Create the CSS to match your liking. (disadvantage: cannot automate the distribution of new CSS changes in the team) 2) Create a browser addon yourself that can override websites CSS. (advantage gained: possibility to automate updates of CSS in the team. disadvantage: all browser addons need to have a user account. it's preferred you don't use your private user - so the addon doesn't become obsolete once you change your job) 3) Create your own Jira addon that overrides websites CSS (advantage gained: addon is a shared component for the team, so anybody with enough rights can work on it. We also have automated distribution of CSS in place. Possible disadvantage: on each update of CSS you need to build and deploy the addon again) Things to consider for number 3): In order not minimize the number of changes and deployments of the addon, put the CSS files on companies shared network drive instead of embedding it into the addon. This also means that you can have multiple folders on your shared drive, each containing CSS for different team / board, and each folder having a unique board ID as a name, so the addon will know what CSS to use per each board, by looking at the board ID. Good luck!

            +1 for this issue.

            Only able to see 6 or 7 cards per screen makes this very difficult to use for planning and prioritizing.

            Also, side note: it is sometimes possible to fit multiple fields on the same line (e.g. Due Date | Component) really does have to take 2 lines.

            Craig Stevenson added a comment - +1 for this issue. Only able to see 6 or 7 cards per screen makes this very difficult to use for planning and prioritizing. Also, side note: it is sometimes possible to fit multiple fields on the same line (e.g. Due Date | Component) really does have to take 2 lines.

            Rainer Mueck added a comment - Try this: https://de.atlassian.com/company/contact/contact-ceos

              Unassigned Unassigned
              2ace1af5ca43 Sam Du'Mont
              Votes:
              99 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              64 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: