-
Bug
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Low
-
None
-
Minor
-
Issue Summary
When the same custom field that is associated with Asset Object is added to both the Request Type and the Form, two undesirable issues occur for the Customer depending on the configuration used.
If you have a Form with two custom fields with the first being a required hidden custom field and the second being of type Assets Object with an AQL in the Filter Issue which is dependent on the first custom field, it will fail for unlicensed users with the following two messages:
- Couldn't send request: This form contains a hidden field that does not have a valid default value configured
- Validation failed for Insight object
Steps to Reproduce
- Create two custom fields:
Custom field Type Context CFA Assets Object "CFB"=${cfb.id} CFB Version Picker (multiple versions)
Multiselect Dropdown
- In a new Form, add the following:
Custom field Type Linked Jira Field Visibility Required Section CFA Asset Objects Linked Jira Field (CFA) Yes Yes Main CFB Multiselect Dropdown Common Jira Field (CFB) No Yes Hidden
NOTES: CFA contains a hidden option that matches the value stored in the CFB
- Add the Form to a Request Type
- Create an issue as a Customer in the Portal
- Create an issue as an Agent in the Portal
Expected Results
When Customers and Agents submit the form,
- no validations should appear and,
- all values will be retained in the form after the issue is created.
Actual Results
When Customers submit the form,
- two validations appear preventing the issue from being created.
When Agents submit the form,
- no validations should appear and,
- all values will be retained in the form after the issue is created.
Workaround
There is currently NO workaround.
- relates to
-
JSDCLOUD-13836 Non-licensed Customer User Submission Behavior on Forms with Assets Different than JSM Agents
-
- Closed
-