Problem

Currently the services are part of a separate object schema called Services. There is no option to have these in the same schema as other Assets objects. Also, it is not possible to create child object type for Services object type.

Suggested Solution

There should be option to have the services in the same schema as any other Assets objects. Also, the ability to create child object types for Services is important.

Why This Is Important

• Better manageability as one object schema can manage all object types
• A regular object schema offers more granularity than Services schema
• Be able to set permissions based on the Schema Roles, with that, not allowing Agents to create new Objects under Services

Workaround

Currently there is no known workaround for this behavior. A workaround will be added here when available