Uploaded image for project: 'Jira Data Center'
  1. Jira Data Center
  2. JRASERVER-42436

Bulk Operations on Issues with Sub Tasks will show the wrong progress count

      NOTE: This bug report is for JIRA Server. Using JIRA Cloud? See the corresponding bug report.

      Summary

      When performing a bulk operation on issues, the count for the issues will be inflated by the number of sub tasks those issues have (even if the sub tasks aren't selected for the bulk operation).

      This is a display problem, as the sub tasks themselves aren't changed (unless they were selected in the bulk operation).

      Steps to Reproduce

      1. Create an issue (TEST-1, and a sub task for that issue (TEST-2
      2. Find the issue with JQL (KEY = TEST-1) and bulk edit that one issue

      Expected Results

      The message above the progress bar shows one issue is being edited.

      Actual Results

      The message above the progress bar shows the number of issues being edited plus the count of subtasks those issues have (although only the issues selected are being edited).

      Bulk Operation:

      Message:

       

      Notes

      Jira is incorrectly including the sub tasks as a part of the calculation.

      Workaround

      There is no workaround for this issue.

        1. bulk.png
          bulk.png
          40 kB
        2. message.png
          message.png
          43 kB

            [JRASERVER-42436] Bulk Operations on Issues with Sub Tasks will show the wrong progress count

            Confirmed 9.17.2 exhibits this behavior.

            Was alarming, since I thought I accidentally modified a larger number of issues than I expected (26 became 126). 🥲

            Dave Liao (Braze) added a comment - Confirmed 9.17.2 exhibits this behavior. Was alarming, since I thought I accidentally modified a larger number of issues than I expected (26 became 126). 🥲

            Jira v9.12.10 is affected too

            Andreas Eder added a comment - Jira v9.12.10 is affected too

            Jira v9.4.15 still has this issue... It freaked me out!! 

            Eduardo Godinez added a comment - Jira v9.4.15 still has this issue... It freaked me out!! 

            Server 8.13.13 alsso has this issue.

            Anu Shibin Joseph Raj added a comment - Server 8.13.13 alsso has this issue.

            Server 8.13.4 also have this issue

            Baiba Baiža added a comment - Server 8.13.4 also have this issue

            XP added a comment - - edited

            I just noticed the related Jira Cloud issue logged as JRACLOUD-42436 was resolved an hour ago. The currently latest comment (from 19 Feb) says:

            The fix for this bug should be available to all the customers by end of next week.

            So obviously the fix is known and implemented for Cloud—is it as simple as dropping it more-or-less in place into Server?

            (oh, and by the way—Server 8.13.2 still exhibits this bug.)

            XP added a comment - - edited I just noticed the related Jira Cloud issue logged as JRACLOUD-42436 was resolved an hour ago. The currently latest comment (from 19 Feb) says: The fix for this bug should be available to all the customers by end of next week. So obviously the fix is known and implemented for Cloud—is it as simple as dropping it more-or-less in place into Server? (oh, and by the way—Server 8.13.2 still exhibits this bug.)

            Phillip H. Blanton added a comment - - edited

            You've been "Gathering Impact" for over two years. Here's the impact...

            "User performs bulk-update. User sees much larger number than what he was expecting. User submits trouble ticket to the help desk. Help desk informs user that it's nothing to worry about. User later forgets that it's nothing to worry about and six months later submits new trouble ticket for strange, worrying number; saying that he kind of remembers something about it but just wants to 'be sure'."

            It simply CANNOT be a difficult fix, so fix it!

            Phillip H. Blanton added a comment - - edited You've been "Gathering Impact" for over two years. Here's the impact... "User performs bulk-update. User sees much larger number than what he was expecting. User submits trouble ticket to the help desk. Help desk informs user that it's nothing to worry about. User later forgets that it's nothing to worry about and six months later submits new trouble ticket for strange, worrying number; saying that he kind of remembers something about it but just wants to 'be sure'." It simply CANNOT be a difficult fix, so fix it!

            I'm not sure if this has already been documented, but I was doing some bulk operations today and was updating 389 (both issues and sub tasks) and was told that 519 issues were being updated. Since I was purposly updating both issues and sub tasks I thought that the count would match in this instance, but I was wrong. 

             

            Here is the query I was using: project = PROJECT AND status = "Rolled Out" AND status changed to "Rolled Out" during (2019-08-01, 2019-10-15) 

            Ryan Thompson added a comment - I'm not sure if this has already been documented, but I was doing some bulk operations today and was updating 389 (both issues and sub tasks) and was told that 519 issues were being updated. Since I was purposly updating both issues and sub tasks I thought that the count would match in this instance, but I was wrong.    Here is the query I was using: project = PROJECT AND status = "Rolled Out" AND status changed to "Rolled Out" during (2019-08-01, 2019-10-15) 

            I was about to open a support issue on this but thought I would check for anything existing; glad I did!  I have been seeing this strange activity from 6.4 all the way up to my current Jira Software version, which is 8.1.0

            Michael Thompson added a comment - I was about to open a support issue on this but thought I would check for anything existing; glad I did!  I have been seeing this strange activity from 6.4 all the way up to my current Jira Software version, which is 8.1.0

            John Price added a comment -

            Thanks, Dave.  I manage multiple large Jira instances (Cloud and Server) and users pretty frequently see the bad counts and then worry that they have accidentally updated the wrong set of issues.  Sometimes they then submit support tickets to us about it and we have to let them know it's a known bug (for years!).

            John Price added a comment - Thanks, Dave.  I manage multiple large Jira instances (Cloud and Server) and users pretty frequently see the bad counts and then worry that they have accidentally updated the wrong set of issues.  Sometimes they then submit support tickets to us about it and we have to let them know it's a known bug (for years!).

              Unassigned Unassigned
              jsilveira Jaime S
              Affected customers:
              127 This affects my team
              Watchers:
              110 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated: