• We collect Jira feedback from various sources, and we evaluate what we've collected when planning our product roadmap. To understand how this piece of feedback will be reviewed, see our Implementation of New Features Policy.

      NOTE: This suggestion is for JIRA Server. Using JIRA Cloud? See the corresponding suggestion.

      Concerning permission scheme administration, we've got a proposal to relieve some stress of a jira admin

      Currently it's possible to copy an existing scheme. However, the new scheme is called "copy of ..." and contains the exact same groups as its ancestor (the original). Usually we want to copy a scheme but we want the same "kind" of groups in the new scheme but they have different names. An example.

      Suppose we've got a project called XXXX with its associated permission scheme XXXX.

      Permission scheme XXXX contains the following groups:

      • XXXX-users
      • XXXX-developers
      • XXXX-administrators

      We create a new project YYYY and want permission scheme YYYY. For this group YYYY we want the same groups as in scheme XXXX with different but analogous names.

      Scheme YYYY

      • YYYY-users
      • YYYY-developers
      • YYYY-administrators

      So, actually, these were a lot of words to ask only for a possibility to do a "find/replace" when copying a permission scheme. Automatically creating the new groups of the new scheme if they don't exist yet is yet another small thing to make the life of an admin a little less painful

            [JRASERVER-2018] permission scheme administration improvements

            Katherine Yabut made changes -
            Workflow Original: JAC Suggestion Workflow [ 3054350 ] New: JAC Suggestion Workflow 3 [ 3684143 ]
            Status Original: RESOLVED [ 5 ] New: Closed [ 6 ]
            Owen made changes -
            Workflow Original: Confluence Workflow - Public Facing v4 [ 2618761 ] New: JAC Suggestion Workflow [ 3054350 ]
            Rachel Lin (Inactive) made changes -
            Workflow Original: JIRA PM Feature Request Workflow v2 - TEMP [ 2589728 ] New: Confluence Workflow - Public Facing v4 [ 2618761 ]
            Status Original: Closed [ 6 ] New: Resolved [ 5 ]
            Ignat (Inactive) made changes -
            Workflow Original: JIRA Bug Workflow w Kanban v6 - TEMP [ 2346972 ] New: JIRA PM Feature Request Workflow v2 - TEMP [ 2589728 ]
            Katherine Yabut made changes -
            Workflow Original: JIRA Bug Workflow w Kanban v6 [ 2113708 ] New: JIRA Bug Workflow w Kanban v6 - TEMP [ 2346972 ]
            Katherine Yabut made changes -
            Workflow Original: JIRA Bug Workflow w Kanban v6 - TEMP [ 2091471 ] New: JIRA Bug Workflow w Kanban v6 [ 2113708 ]
            Katherine Yabut made changes -
            Workflow Original: JIRA Bug Workflow w Kanban v6 [ 889816 ] New: JIRA Bug Workflow w Kanban v6 - TEMP [ 2091471 ]
            jonah (Inactive) made changes -
            Description Original: Concerning permission scheme administration, we've got a proposal to relieve some stress of a jira admin ;-)

            Currently it's possible to copy an existing scheme. However, the new scheme is called "copy of ..." and contains the exact same groups as its ancestor (the original). Usually we want to copy a scheme but we want the same "kind" of groups in the new scheme but they have different names. An example.

            Suppose we've got a project called XXXX with its associated permission scheme XXXX.

            Permission scheme XXXX contains the following groups:
            - XXXX-users
            - XXXX-developers
            - XXXX-administrators

            We create a new project YYYY and want permission scheme YYYY. For this group YYYY we want the same groups as in scheme XXXX with different but analogous names.

            Scheme YYYY
            - YYYY-users
            - YYYY-developers
            - YYYY-administrators

            So, actually, these were a lot of words to ask only for a possibility to do a "find/replace" when copying a permission scheme. Automatically creating the new groups of the new scheme if they don't exist yet is yet another small thing to make the life of an admin a little less painful :-)
            New: {panel:bgColor=#e7f4fa}
              *NOTE:* This suggestion is for *JIRA Server*. Using *JIRA Cloud*? [See the corresponding suggestion|http://jira.atlassian.com/browse/JRACLOUD-2018].
              {panel}

            Concerning permission scheme administration, we've got a proposal to relieve some stress of a jira admin ;-)

            Currently it's possible to copy an existing scheme. However, the new scheme is called "copy of ..." and contains the exact same groups as its ancestor (the original). Usually we want to copy a scheme but we want the same "kind" of groups in the new scheme but they have different names. An example.

            Suppose we've got a project called XXXX with its associated permission scheme XXXX.

            Permission scheme XXXX contains the following groups:
            - XXXX-users
            - XXXX-developers
            - XXXX-administrators

            We create a new project YYYY and want permission scheme YYYY. For this group YYYY we want the same groups as in scheme XXXX with different but analogous names.

            Scheme YYYY
            - YYYY-users
            - YYYY-developers
            - YYYY-administrators

            So, actually, these were a lot of words to ask only for a possibility to do a "find/replace" when copying a permission scheme. Automatically creating the new groups of the new scheme if they don't exist yet is yet another small thing to make the life of an admin a little less painful :-)
            jonah (Inactive) made changes -
            Link New: This issue relates to JRACLOUD-2018 [ JRACLOUD-2018 ]
            Hannes Obweger (Inactive) made changes -
            Component/s New: Project Administration - Permissions [ 10321 ]
            Component/s Original: Administration [Deprecated] [ 10271 ]

              Unassigned Unassigned
              a8c2c1de0928 Kristof Van Cleemput
              Votes:
              10 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: