• 30
    • 8
    • Our product teams collect and evaluate feedback from a number of different sources. To learn more about how we use customer feedback in the planning process, check out our new feature policy.

      Currently, the Roadmap feature filter epics by status categories: "To Do", "In Progress", and "Done".

      As a user, I want to filter epics in Roadmap based on the statuses/board's column names instead of status categories. Filter by statuses is more intuitive.

      Edited to add based on further feedback in comments 24 March 2023:  Ideally, on Roadmaps we would like to see a Status (not Status category) filter dropdown that is dynamically populated with all statuses included in the workflows associated with the project.

      Workaround

      On the Roadmap use Quick filters (company-managed) or Custom filters (team-managed). Unfortunately, you would need to create a filter for each status, which is why this is a workaround rather than a fix:

            [JRACLOUD-91485] As a user, I want the Roadmap filter based on status/columns

            danmachen added a comment -

            Please resolve!

            danmachen added a comment - Please resolve!

            We currently have two done/green category statuses for Epics, "Done" and "Closed". Currently in the roadmap view, when "show completed epics" is enabled and set to look back for some months (1 month, 2 months, 5 months, etc) it will include all of the "Closed" epics regardless of when they were marked resolved. I don't know if there's a separate ticket to track/address this particular issue, but if this ticket is picked up by Atlassian at least we'd be able to filter out non-default statuses as a workaround.

            Christine Lee added a comment - We currently have two done/green category statuses for Epics, "Done" and "Closed". Currently in the roadmap view, when "show completed epics" is enabled and set to look back for some months (1 month, 2 months, 5 months, etc) it will include all of the "Closed" epics regardless of when they were marked resolved. I don't know if there's a separate ticket to track/address this particular issue, but if this ticket is picked up by Atlassian at least we'd be able to filter out non-default statuses as a workaround.

            Would be great to have this feature available! 

            Karel.Sousek added a comment - Would be great to have this feature available! 

            Anusha, Yes we would like a drop down to filter based on status rather than status category. In our case we'd like just the statuses used for Epics but a list of all statuses would be better than the Status Category list. Thank you.

            Abbigail Westerdale added a comment - Anusha, Yes we would like a drop down to filter based on status rather than status category. In our case we'd like just the statuses used for Epics but a list of all statuses would be better than the Status Category list. Thank you.

            I have added a workaround to the original post describing how Roadmap filters can be used to filter by Status (not Status category).

            Can I confirm with the watchers of this issue, would you ideally like to see a Roadmap Status (not Status category) filter dropdown that is dynamically populated with all statuses included in the workflows associated with the project? Thanks!

            Anusha Rutnam added a comment - I have added a workaround to the original post describing how Roadmap filters can be used to filter by Status (not Status category ). Can I confirm with the watchers of this issue, would you ideally like to see a Roadmap Status (not Status category) filter dropdown that is dynamically populated with all statuses included in the workflows associated with the project? Thanks!

            There seems to be a growing interest in this feature.  Is there any news on when this might be scheduled?

            garth.mcdonald added a comment - There seems to be a growing interest in this feature.  Is there any news on when this might be scheduled?

            Tom Croyle added a comment - - edited

            This feature would be incredibly helpful. We don't want to report every epic in our backlog to stakeholders; leveraging "Labels" is a tedious workaround given that we already have epic statuses that we could leverage (i.e. Backlog vs. To Do).

            Tom Croyle added a comment - - edited This feature would be incredibly helpful. We don't want to report every epic in our backlog to stakeholders; leveraging "Labels" is a tedious workaround given that we already have epic statuses that we could leverage (i.e. Backlog vs. To Do).

            +1 massive benefit to my use cases if this is implemented

            Barry Scallan added a comment - +1 massive benefit to my use cases if this is implemented

            This request has been out here for almost 2 years and seems to have interest. Will this make it to your roadmap soon? Many teams would benefit from this feature.

            Elishia Kroll added a comment - This request has been out here for almost 2 years and seems to have interest. Will this make it to your roadmap soon? Many teams would benefit from this feature.

            This would be useful for to reflect the different phases of an epic beyond just in progress = in dev

            Arbër Pllana added a comment - This would be useful for to reflect the different phases of an epic beyond just in progress = in dev

              Unassigned Unassigned
              htemp Heitor T (Inactive)
              Votes:
              157 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              83 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated: