Uploaded image for project: 'Jira Platform Cloud'
  1. Jira Platform Cloud
  2. JRACLOUD-18839

Create a JQL functionality to filter the sub-task / child issue for a field value of the parent issue

XMLWordPrintable

    • 119
    • 78

    • Our product teams collect and evaluate feedback from a number of different sources. To learn more about how we use customer feedback in the planning process, check out our new feature policy.

      NOTE: This suggestion is for JIRA Cloud. Using JIRA Server? See the corresponding suggestion.

      Atlassian Update – 13 Jan 2016

      Hi everyone,

      Thanks for voting and commenting on this issue. Your feedback is key to helping us understand how you use JIRA so we can continue improving your experience. We have reviewed this issue over the last few days; however there are no immediate plans to put this suggestion on our near term roadmap.

      Please remember that jira.atlassian.com is one of many inputs for the JIRA roadmap. You can learn more about our process here.

      I understand that our decision may be disappointing. Please don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.

      Regards,
      Daniel Franz
      dfranz@atlassian.com
      Principal Product Manager, JIRA Platform

      Hi,
      I need to filter sub-tasks with certain values and the parent issue have a customfield to filter too.
      Example:

      parent=(cf[10000]="ParentValue1") AND cf[10001]="Subtaskvalue3"

      where cf[10000] is a parent customfield and cf[10001] is a subtask customfiel.

      Other dreamed example:

      parent.cf[10000]="ParentValue1" AND subtask.cf[10001]="Subtaskvalue3"

      Is possible? Thanks.

            [JRACLOUD-18839] Create a JQL functionality to filter the sub-task / child issue for a field value of the parent issue

            Rathnayake, Malshani added a comment - - edited

            The ticket is raised ages ago and yet no progress with this. This a main feature needed for reporting, and can this be an enterprise solution without having the basic capabilities? JSM reporting only allows the users to just take very basic filters, it doesn't allow filter out data from custom objects, not able to get data from two tables, at least cannot get data from a Parent/Child task!. These are very important reports in CIO/top management level reporting. Very disappointing 

            Rathnayake, Malshani added a comment - - edited The ticket is raised ages ago and yet no progress with this. This a main feature needed for reporting, and can this be an enterprise solution without having the basic capabilities? JSM reporting only allows the users to just take very basic filters, it doesn't allow filter out data from custom objects, not able to get data from two tables, at least cannot get data from a Parent/Child task!. These are very important reports in CIO/top management level reporting. Very disappointing 

            Wil Aguirre added a comment -

            https://getsupport.atlassian.com/browse/PCS-312574

            Wil Aguirre added a comment - https://getsupport.atlassian.com/browse/PCS-312574

            Craig Cote added a comment -

            +1

            Craig Cote added a comment - +1

            Alexandre Gagnon added a comment -

            +1

            Alexandre Gagnon added a comment - +1

            samuel.peyer added a comment -

            Would be great to get an update from Atlassian - this function is overdue

            samuel.peyer added a comment - Would be great to get an update from Atlassian - this function is overdue

            Falcon Momot added a comment -

            I wonder why Atlassian doesn't want to implement this.  It would be incredibly useful for my use case, and it sounds like, for the use cases of many others too.  It's possible to do things like "issueLink in watchedIssues()", so I wonder why it's not possible to do things like "issueLink in (issueType = foo and statusType != done)".

            Falcon Momot added a comment - I wonder why Atlassian doesn't want to implement this.  It would be incredibly useful for my use case, and it sounds like, for the use cases of many others too.  It's possible to do things like "issueLink in watchedIssues()", so I wonder why it's not possible to do things like "issueLink in (issueType = foo and statusType != done)".

            Cat Digua added a comment -

            +1

            Cat Digua added a comment - +1

            Yanick Schlatter added a comment -

            Would be very usefull and no I'm not going to use Scriptrunner.

            Yanick Schlatter added a comment - Would be very usefull and no I'm not going to use Scriptrunner.

            David Arturo Cruz Salinas added a comment -

            Maybe there is no support for Jira anymore and we haven't noticed it

            David Arturo Cruz Salinas added a comment - Maybe there is no support for Jira anymore and we haven't noticed it

            Olivier Reuland added a comment -

            +1

            Olivier Reuland added a comment - +1

              Unassigned Unassigned
              836c870f2b45 Abner Luis Santos Rolim
              Votes:
              601 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              257 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated: