• Icon: Suggestion Suggestion
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • 6.2.1
    • None
    • None
    • We collect Jira feedback from various sources, and we evaluate what we've collected when planning our product roadmap. To understand how this piece of feedback will be reviewed, see our Implementation of New Features Policy.

      As Patrick, I want to use epics for swimlanes so I can see progress of each epic within a sprint more easily.

      1. Both stories and subtasks for the epics should display.
      2. Only an option for Scrum boards
      3. The swimlane presentation is similar to "story task" swimlane: Epic Name, possibly issue key
      4. No detail view shown for epic; clicking on swimlane selects first issue in swimlane (same as Assignee)
      5. Issues without epics shows at the bottom

          Form Name

            [JSWSERVER-7753] Swimlane by epic

            Bb66054 added a comment -

            This still seems broken to me. There's no option to have a swim lanes by epic in hosted.

            Bb66054 added a comment - This still seems broken to me. There's no option to have a swim lanes by epic in hosted.

            Kaley added a comment - - edited

            When a story is filtered out with a quick-filter, the sub-tasks for that story all show up at the bottom as "issues without epics." This really limits the usefulness of this feature!

            Kaley added a comment - - edited When a story is filtered out with a quick-filter, the sub-tasks for that story all show up at the bottom as "issues without epics." This really limits the usefulness of this feature!

            Related to some of the comments above (regarding the need to support down to the subtask level), as we're going through our Jira / GH evaluation, this is something we're really struggling with on the kanban boards. We've investigated using labels instead (to emulate the grouping provided by epics), and this allows me to create a swimlane per label, but I have to manually set each subtask to contain the label also. Does anyone have any better workarounds for organizing issues on the kanban board?

            Andrew Fisher added a comment - Related to some of the comments above (regarding the need to support down to the subtask level), as we're going through our Jira / GH evaluation, this is something we're really struggling with on the kanban boards. We've investigated using labels instead (to emulate the grouping provided by epics), and this allows me to create a swimlane per label, but I have to manually set each subtask to contain the label also. Does anyone have any better workarounds for organizing issues on the kanban board?

            Lise added a comment -

            Agree with Taber, I need to combine swimlanes for versions, epics and stories with subtasks.

            Lise added a comment - Agree with Taber, I need to combine swimlanes for versions, epics and stories with subtasks.

            I vote for this but with a 'twist':
            See the request I logged here: https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/GHS-8161
            Basically, to allow a toggle to further segregate a swimlane (swimlane(s) within a seimlane) by Version, Epic, etc (which Jira already knows about, no need to configure a 'quick filter').

            Taber Loveless added a comment - I vote for this but with a 'twist': See the request I logged here: https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/GHS-8161 Basically, to allow a toggle to further segregate a swimlane (swimlane(s) within a seimlane) by Version, Epic, etc (which Jira already knows about, no need to configure a 'quick filter').

            Please fix. Can hack now with custom swimlane queries, but these don't include any sub-tasks. Please fix ASAP!

            Mark Alexander added a comment - Please fix. Can hack now with custom swimlane queries, but these don't include any sub-tasks. Please fix ASAP!

            From my point of view, the "Epic"-feature isn't complete without this function.

            I just spend a day configuring a project in a SCRUM-like-manner just because I thought
            I could gain an automaticly epic-ordered board.

            I was very surprised, that this didn't work...

            Sascha Ernst added a comment - From my point of view, the "Epic"-feature isn't complete without this function. I just spend a day configuring a project in a SCRUM-like-manner just because I thought I could gain an automaticly epic-ordered board. I was very surprised, that this didn't work...

            you can already do that if you know the epic label and then customize the board with jql statement.

            Geoffrey Emery added a comment - you can already do that if you know the epic label and then customize the board with jql statement.

            +1

            J (Inactive) added a comment - +1

              Unassigned Unassigned
              tkotecki Tom Kotecki (Inactive)
              Votes:
              13 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              39 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: