• Icon: Suggestion Suggestion
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • None
    • Directory - LDAP
    • 16
    • Our product teams collect and evaluate feedback from a number of different sources. To learn more about how we use customer feedback in the planning process, check out our new feature policy.

      Support the definition of arbitrary LDAP filters, where users matched are deemed to be part of a group.

      An example requirement, from Brown University in the USA:

      1. Dynamic Groups requirements from Brown University are pretty simple:

      We'll need the ability to define a dynamic group based on more or less arbitrary ldap query patterns on people objects in the People OU. A couple examples:

      (&(objectClass=inetorgperson)(Type=student))
      (&(objectClass=inetorgperson)(primaryaffiliation=clinical faculty)(mailstop=1117))

      So a very broad filter set that allows admins in Crowd to define a group based on an ldap filter starting at a particular ou would be useful.

            [CWD-821] Support for dynamic LDAP groups

            My organization uses a bunch of dynamic groups, so getting this supported would be awesome

            Kristian Doak added a comment - My organization uses a bunch of dynamic groups, so getting this supported would be awesome

            Just curious, is there any update on whether this requirement will be supported?

            Evan Montgomery-Recht added a comment - Just curious, is there any update on whether this requirement will be supported?

            If Crowd has a dynamic groups, this would be so great for all administrators of JIRA and Confluence.

            Tim Eddelbüttel added a comment - If Crowd has a dynamic groups, this would be so great for all administrators of JIRA and Confluence.

            Is this something that is being considered for the future?

            Pelle Kirkeby (Inactive) added a comment - Is this something that is being considered for the future?

            Hi Abhay,

            We're not currently working on this, and we don't have the work scheduled for the near future either.

            Cheers,
            Dave.

            David O'Flynn [Atlassian] added a comment - Hi Abhay, We're not currently working on this, and we don't have the work scheduled for the near future either. Cheers, Dave.

            Is atlassian working on implementing this?

            Abhay Dabholkar added a comment - Is atlassian working on implementing this?

            This may also involve support for the LDAP object class/attribute "groupOfURLs". Needs further research to determine which Directory Servers support it, along with the complexity of implementing.

            David O'Flynn [Atlassian] added a comment - This may also involve support for the LDAP object class/attribute "groupOfURLs". Needs further research to determine which Directory Servers support it, along with the complexity of implementing.

            Breaking out dynamic group support from nested group support.

            David O'Flynn [Atlassian] added a comment - Breaking out dynamic group support from nested group support.

              Unassigned Unassigned
              doflynn David O'Flynn [Atlassian]
              Votes:
              13 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              15 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated: