Uploaded image for project: 'Atlassian Cloud'
  1. Atlassian Cloud
  2. CLOUD-11690

The ability to remove managed users from external sites

    • Icon: Suggestion Suggestion
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Security
    • None
    • 103
    • Our product teams collect and evaluate feedback from a number of different sources. To learn more about how we use customer feedback in the planning process, check out our new feature policy.

    • Jira Software

      Update Oct 15 2024: 

      Hi, we are happy to share some new updates to this ticket in regards to the following issues listed:

      • Ability to create new sites for Jira and Confluence
      • Ability to create new Bitbucket or Trello accounts
      • Ability to join sites or products external to the organization
      • Ability to remove managed users from external sites
      • Ability to remove access to specific products

      We have solved these issues through both proactive and reactive controls for user-created instances (also referred to as sites), and an organization admin’s ability to control them.

      With our Atlassian Guard (formerly Atlassian Access) feature automatic product discovery, admins are able to see what user-created instances exist within their cloud footprint and join these instances to take over control. By doing so, they can remove certain users, products, etc. - and determine the best next steps.

      With the Enterprise plan feature product requests, admins can set a policy and then either deny or approve requests for a new user-created instance. This feature is available to customers who have a Jira, Confluence, or Jira Service Management Enterprise plan - and coverage now expands to Trello and Bitbucket (Premium plan, in beta).

      For further information, please refer to our latest community post: An update on product requests: bringing shadow IT controls to Trello and Bitbucket

            [CLOUD-11690] The ability to remove managed users from external sites

            As Org admins we should be able to control what we allow users to do on out tenant.  please enabled these features asap

            Fausto Gherardini added a comment - As Org admins we should be able to control what we allow users to do on out tenant.  please enabled these features asap

            Fix this now, please, or stop charging us for access for these users.

            Lisa Dunkin added a comment - Fix this now, please, or stop charging us for access for these users.

            +1 stop being greedy and sweeping it under the carpet!

            Richard Lythaby added a comment - +1 stop being greedy and sweeping it under the carpet!

            Eugen G. added a comment -

            Can this finally be implemented, please - as the initial request (comp. https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/ACCESS-1468) is already from 30/Jan/2020 ???

            Eugen G. added a comment - Can this finally be implemented, please - as the initial request (comp. https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/ACCESS-1468 ) is already from 30/Jan/2020 ???

            This is genuinely asinine since this request https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/ACCESS-1468 is being split into multiple issues. 

            When people talk about rigging the vote, diluting the constituency, invalidating the polls, or just generally intentionally missing the point, this is EXACTLY what they mean, this ticket and its siblings, right here.  

            Yes, we're mad about this.  This is infuriating.  

            See also: Gerrymandering - Wikipedia

            Joshua Selser added a comment - This is genuinely asinine since this request https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/ACCESS-1468 is being split into multiple issues.  When people talk about rigging the vote, diluting the constituency, invalidating the polls, or just generally intentionally missing the point, this is EXACTLY what they mean, this ticket and its siblings, right here.   Yes, we're mad about this.  This is infuriating.   See also: Gerrymandering - Wikipedia

            nothing like a company trying to hide feature requests by moving it to new tickets and delaying development.

            Gavin Teichman added a comment - nothing like a company trying to hide feature requests by moving it to new tickets and delaying development.

            wvorigin added a comment -

            Even if the user never logged in on the external site, it cost an Atlassian Access slot 

             

             

            Product access for external sites is not manageable.
            So the visibility I more or less have, but the abillity to decrease the bill by removing the user is not directly in my hands. Unless a lot of manual effort to fix this.

            wvorigin added a comment - Even if the user never logged in on the external site, it cost an Atlassian Access slot      Product access for external sites is not manageable. So the visibility I more or less have, but the abillity to decrease the bill by removing the user is not directly in my hands. Unless a lot of manual effort to fix this.

            an essential feature of atlassian access. But what's the point of paying so much for it?

            Tristan Martin added a comment - an essential feature of atlassian access. But what's the point of paying so much for it?

            This is a critical need for our business. Users at my company signed up for products prior to our corporate licensing of Atlassian. This results in fractured products that requires a lot of manual effort to fix. 

            Clayton Mathis added a comment - This is a critical need for our business. Users at my company signed up for products prior to our corporate licensing of Atlassian. This results in fractured products that requires a lot of manual effort to fix. 

              gjones@atlassian.com Griffin Jones
              gjones@atlassian.com Griffin Jones
              Votes:
              243 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              172 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: