Uploaded image for project: 'Bitbucket Cloud'
  1. Bitbucket Cloud
  2. BCLOUD-10833

Ability to add a group as a reviewer on a PR

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Our product teams collect and evaluate feedback from a number of different sources. To learn more about how we use customer feedback in the planning process, check out our new feature policy.

    Description

      I would like to add an entire group as reviewer of a pull request.

      Maybe the easy way could we an "alias" that automatically add every member in the group as a PR reviewer.


      We have hundreds of repositories and adding default reviewers to every single one, or every single time when creating a new repository is a pain... Here's what I suggest.

      1. Allow creating user groups dedicated as code reviewers.
      2. Allow a global, project, target branch and repository setting to use a default user group of code reviewers.
        1. We use projects as brands to separate clients, thus separating development teams and following our legal process of client security by not mixing data.
      3. Update the current default reviewers setting to choose 1 or multiple user groups of code reviewers.
      4. The branch permissions dialog should inherit the user groups if default reviewers is selected or allow global user group.
        1. Code reviewer user groups may need to have default permission to 'merge via pull request' or at least figure out an updated UX solution for automation.

      This would save so much time. Please vote!

       


      Latest update from Atlassian 2024-03-28

      Code owners functionality has been added in Bitbucket Cloud: https://bitbucket.org/blog/code-owners

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            People

              dparrish Dave Parrish [Atlassian]
              772f9906e67e jdeniau
              Votes:
              126 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              67 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: