Uploaded image for project: 'Sourcetree For Mac'
  1. Sourcetree For Mac
  2. SRCTREE-2447

unchecking "... sending data about your usage" preference on initial setup is not respected in the regular preferences

    • Icon: Bug Bug
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Icon: Low Low
    • 1.9.4
    • 1.9.2
    • General
    • None
    • Version 1.9.2 on OS X 10.9 and 10.10

      Classification: Usability

      Reproducable: always

      Summary: On initial setup, the user is presented with a modal window in which they are asked whether they are willing to send data about their usage. After initial setup, when that option was unchecked, the same setting is checked in the app's preferences.

      Steps to Reproduce:
      1) Install Source Tree for Mac
      2) Uncheck the "... sending data about your usage" checkbook
      3) Finish initial setup
      4) cmd-, to get into preferences
      5) Observe corresponding checkbox is checked

      Expected Results:
      Checkbox in preferences should match the user's decision during setup.
      Actual Results:
      The user's decision is not respected.
      Regressions: unknown
      Notes:
      This may cause a user to trust you less...

          Form Name

            [SRCTREE-2447] unchecking "... sending data about your usage" preference on initial setup is not respected in the regular preferences

            W00t. Happy to help. Avid JIRA and SourceTree user. Love your products. Only noticed because I was installing Yosemite preview for nerding out purposes. Otherwise, your app has been a permanent resident on my machine since it started supporting both git and hg.

            Thanks again!

            ++js;

            Jonathan Saggau added a comment - W00t. Happy to help. Avid JIRA and SourceTree user. Love your products. Only noticed because I was installing Yosemite preview for nerding out purposes. Otherwise, your app has been a permanent resident on my machine since it started supporting both git and hg. Thanks again! ++js;

            Thanks for spotting this, a rogue binding meant this wasn't linked up correctly (the prefs option was). Fixed for the next update.

            Steve Streeting (Inactive) added a comment - Thanks for spotting this, a rogue binding meant this wasn't linked up correctly (the prefs option was). Fixed for the next update.

              Unassigned Unassigned
              f0e578a38f5f Jonathan Saggau
              Affected customers:
              0 This affects my team
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: