-
Bug
-
Resolution: Duplicate
-
Low (View bug fix roadmap)
-
8.20.1
-
8.2
-
2
-
Severity 3 - Minor
-
8
-
Issue Summary
Rest API output from Jira server returns unexpected value of team field to Confluence Cloud, ie, it is returning an ID instead of the team name. "Team" field is a custom field which is a part of Jira Advanced Road Maps.
Steps to Reproduce
- On server use https://BASEURL/rest/api/latest/field to find the 'Team' field
- Use https://BASEURL/rest/api/latest/issue/ISSUEKEY find the field output
Expected Results
Jira should return name of the team field to Confluence Cloud, the same way it shows in DC Confluence.
Actual Results
However, the ID of the team field is returned from the Jira Server to Confluence Cloud, which is of no relevance to the end user.
Workaround
Currently there is no known workaround for this behavior. A workaround will be added here when available
- duplicates
-
JPOSERVER-2911 Add Advanced Roadmaps Team name to Issue rest call
- Closed
- relates to
-
JRASERVER-76114 Rest API output from Jira server returned wrong JSON format for `Sprint` field
-
- Gathering Impact
-
[JSWSERVER-25351] Rest API output from Jira server returning ID instead of name for 'Team' field
Fix Version/s | New: 8.22.0 [ 98792 ] |
Resolution | New: Duplicate [ 3 ] | |
Status | Original: In Progress [ 3 ] | New: Closed [ 6 ] |
Link |
New:
This issue duplicates |
Status | Original: Gathering Impact [ 12072 ] | New: In Progress [ 3 ] |
Assignee | New: Daniel Rauf [ drauf ] |
Remote Link | Original: This issue links to "PSR-884 (Bulldog)" [ 833479 ] | New: This issue links to "PSR-884 (JIRA Server (Bulldog))" [ 833479 ] |
Remote Link | New: This issue links to "PSR-884 (Bulldog)" [ 833479 ] |
Comment | [ [https://getsupport.atlassian.com/projects/ACE/queues/custom/1110/ACE-4124] - Mega Migrator Amadeus is currently affected by this bug. This is causing delays in the migration timeline. This customer is under executive escalation. ] |
Labels | New: ACE-4158 |
Dear Customers,
I've identified this issue as a duplicate of
JPOSERVER-2911, which has been addressed in Jira version 8.22.0.I will proceed to close this issue due to the duplication. For more details, please refer to
JPOSERVER-2911.Daniel Rauf
Software Engineer