-
Suggestion
-
Resolution: Won't Do
-
None
-
None
-
2
-
If subtasks exist in an issue, we estimate only these ones and not the parrent issue.
When I check the "epic report", the Original Time Estimate is 0 for the issue and this issue is counted for one unestimated issue ! (see attached file)
It could be really useful to have the addition of estimate values of each sub task in the report, like we can do when the parent issue is showed in the time tracking part (see attached file)
- duplicates
-
JSWSERVER-5471 Parent issue without estimate should provide its subtasks estimates in rapid board plan mode
- Gathering Interest
- relates to
-
JSWSERVER-9775 Jira Agile should show the subtask total with the Estimate field in the Details View
- Gathering Interest
- mentioned in
-
Page Failed to load
[JSWSERVER-11225] JIRA Agile should add the original time estimate of the subtasks included in a parent issue
Workflow | Original: JAC Suggestion Workflow [ 3070166 ] | New: JAC Suggestion Workflow 3 [ 3663090 ] |
Status | Original: RESOLVED [ 5 ] | New: Closed [ 6 ] |
Workflow | Original: Confluence Workflow - Public Facing v4 [ 2625331 ] | New: JAC Suggestion Workflow [ 3070166 ] |
Remote Link | New: This issue links to "Page (Confluence)" [ 368429 ] |
Resolution | New: Won't Do [ 10000 ] | |
Status | Original: Gathering Interest [ 11772 ] | New: Resolved [ 5 ] |
Support reference count | New: 2 |
Workflow | Original: JIRA PM Feature Request Workflow v2 - TEMP [ 2327424 ] | New: Confluence Workflow - Public Facing v4 [ 2625331 ] |
Status | Original: Open [ 1 ] | New: Gathering Interest [ 11772 ] |
Workflow | Original: JIRA PM Feature Request Workflow v2 [ 2044262 ] | New: JIRA PM Feature Request Workflow v2 - TEMP [ 2327424 ] |
Workflow | Original: JIRA PM Feature Request Workflow v2 - TEMP [ 2032458 ] | New: JIRA PM Feature Request Workflow v2 [ 2044262 ] |
Workflow | Original: JIRA PM Feature Request Workflow v2 [ 733758 ] | New: JIRA PM Feature Request Workflow v2 - TEMP [ 2032458 ] |
Hi,
Thank you for raising this suggestion. We regret to inform you that due to limited demand, we have no plans to implement it in the foreseeable future. In order to set expectations, we're closing this request now. Sometimes potentially valuable tickets do get closed where the Summary or Description has not caught the attention of the community. If you feel that this suggestion is valuable, consider describing in more detail or outlining how this request will help you achieve your goals. We may then be able to provide better guidance.
For more context, check out our Community blog on our renewed approach to highly voted Server suggestions for Jira and Confluence.
Thanks again.
Regards,
Jira Product Management