-
Bug
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Low
-
None
-
8.19.1, 8.20.0, 8.20.1
-
8.19
-
4
-
Severity 3 - Minor
-
2
-
Issue Summary
As explained in Workflow Properties, it is possible to add properties to statuses in workflows to change the behavior of a ticket, once a ticket enters this status.
For example, when using the property key jira.permission.assignable.group, we can limit the users who can be assigned an issue to only members of a specific group.
The problem is that, since Jira 8.19.1, the property key jira.permission.assignable.group is not longer taken into account: instead of only returning users from a particular group in the assignee user picker, all users are listed.
This bug is a regression of the optimized user search which was introduced in Jira 8.19.1 by fixing the 4 bugs listed below:
- Performance regression in user lookup
- Searching and Mentioning users may cause performance issues and high CPU load
- User Picker Dropdown takes an excessive amount of time to load when there are thousands of users in Jira and up to 49 users in the Assignable User permission
- mention results differ between issue creation and issue view
Environment
Jira 8.19.1 and any higher version.
Steps to replicate
- Install a fresh vanilla Jira 8.19.1 instance
- Create a new Jira project (for example, Jira Core project)
- Create 2 users in the Jira instance, with only 1 user is in the group jira-administrators
- Configure the status "To Do" in the workflow of the Jira Core project with the property key jira.permission.assignable.group set to jira-administrators
- Create a new ticket and transition it to the "To Do" status - Click on the pencil button next to the assignee field
Expected results
Only the user who belongs to the group jira-administrators should be listed
Actual results
Users who don't belong to the group jira-administrators are also listed:
Workaround
No workaround available
- is a regression of
-
JRASERVER-72101 Performance regression in user lookup
- Closed
- relates to
-
JRASERVER-73023 Server Error while assigning Issue or performing mentioned Search in comment
- Closed
- mentioned in
-
Page Loading...