• 8
    • 4
    • We collect Jira feedback from various sources, and we evaluate what we've collected when planning our product roadmap. To understand how this piece of feedback will be reviewed, see our Implementation of New Features Policy.

      NOTE: This suggestion is for JIRA Server. Using JIRA Cloud? See the corresponding suggestion.

      Issue Summary

      When a user performs a search and the result includes a lot of issue types, the user is presented with the icons for these issue types instead of the name of the issue type.

      In essence, making it difficult to easily discern which issue type each issue is if they have used same images as icons.

      Feature

      Can an option be added that lets the JIRA admin toggle between showing the issue type name or it's icon for their instance.

      Existing Behavior

      JIRA would only show the feature name if no icon is associated with it and there's no way to toggle between the two.

      Known KB that Achieves feature partly:

            [JRASERVER-60945] Show Issue Type Name instead of Icon in Issue Navigator

            +1

            Need this badly. Not being able to see what is the issue is inconvenient. You can't just hover over the issue everytime you want to see which type of request it was. Please fix. 

            Sabbir Quarishi added a comment - +1 Need this badly. Not being able to see what is the issue is inconvenient. You can't just hover over the issue everytime you want to see which type of request it was. Please fix. 

            +1 : it is a pain as it limits readability in lists used for revieuw/audit purposes within teams.

             

            Jeremy Scheppers added a comment - +1 : it is a pain as it limits readability in lists used for revieuw/audit purposes within teams.  

            Agree, this is critical functionality IMO so that users don't have to hover over to see a basic description, plus the icons all look the same

            Kevin Jackey added a comment - Agree, this is critical functionality IMO so that users don't have to hover over to see a basic description, plus the icons all look the same

            Aidan added a comment -

            This would be really helpful and shouldn't have to be a paid for work around. 

            Aidan added a comment - This would be really helpful and shouldn't have to be a paid for work around. 

            Manfred added a comment -

            Thank you so much Joseph & Gordon! Works perfect!

            Manfred added a comment - Thank you so much Joseph & Gordon! Works perfect!

            Hi all - thanks for the comments. What do users like me to that do not have the ScriptRunner (apart from getting it  ) I think this is something that should be configurable. Thank you

            Yatish Madhav added a comment - Hi all - thanks for the comments. What do users like me to that do not have the ScriptRunner (apart from getting it  ) I think this is something that should be configurable. Thank you

            Works also with app Jira Misc Custom Fields (JMCF).

            Create Custom Field of type 'Calculated (scripted) Text/Html Field (JMCF app)'
            Groovy Formula: issue.getIssueType().getName()

            Stefan Brunner added a comment - Works also with app Jira Misc Custom Fields (JMCF). Create Custom Field of type 'Calculated (scripted) Text/Html Field (JMCF app)' Groovy Formula: issue.getIssueType().getName()

            Fantastic Joseph! Thank you so much for sharing this! Note to other Scriptrunner novices like myself - you create the custom field as Joseph describes in Jira Issues admin but you add the short script to it in manage apps/ Scriptrunner admin/Fields

            Gordon Rutherford added a comment - Fantastic Joseph! Thank you so much for sharing this! Note to other Scriptrunner novices like myself - you create the custom field as Joseph describes in Jira Issues admin but you add the short script to it in manage apps/ Scriptrunner admin/Fields

            This works a charm! Many thanks for sharing.

            Glenn Provoost added a comment - This works a charm! Many thanks for sharing.

            If you have Scriptrunner you can create a Scripted Custom field and use this one liner:

            issue.getIssueType().getName()

            Don't bother adding the custom field to a screen, just leave it globally available to all projects, and you can now add Issue Type, Issue Type Name, or both to Issue Navigator Queues and Dashboards.

            Hope this is helpful.

            Jordan Loverock added a comment - If you have Scriptrunner you can create a Scripted Custom field and use this one liner: issue.getIssueType().getName() Don't bother adding the custom field to a screen, just leave it globally available to all projects, and you can now add Issue Type, Issue Type Name, or both to Issue Navigator Queues and Dashboards. Hope this is helpful.

            I second everything that was written before me. Managers need the value of the "Issue Type" not a pretty icon it represents. Please get it done.

            Gregory Kremer added a comment - I second everything that was written before me. Managers need the value of the "Issue Type" not a pretty icon it represents. Please get it done.

            David Bakkers added a comment - - edited

            +1

            This is a genuine PITA. Also, when using the Jira Issues macro in Confluence, the Type column comes back as icons, not text like 'Story', 'Epic', 'Risk' etc. An icon is useless for other macros to use for filtering or exporting.

            Given that in JQL we can search for the type of issue by its text name, it seems absurd to only be able to get back a non-text result. Add a new value to return, such as issueTypeAsText so that we can choose which to return.... an icon or the text.

            David Bakkers added a comment - - edited +1 This is a genuine PITA. Also, when using the Jira Issues macro in Confluence, the Type column comes back as icons, not text like 'Story', 'Epic', 'Risk' etc. An icon is useless for other macros to use for filtering or exporting. Given that in JQL we can search for the type of issue by its text name, it seems absurd to only be able to get back a non-text result. Add a new value to return, such as issueTypeAsText so that we can choose which to return.... an icon or the text.

            Sean M added a comment - - edited

            Managers want to use search filters for tabular reports. Putting icons in them is useless. Even when I subscribe to a filter, the email contains the icons.

            As a result of this I have to explain to my bosses that this is yet another tiny little niggling Jira design decision that breaks reasonable use cases.

            No. Please fix this.

            For now I will try and work around this unfortunate decision by using a 3rd party plugin to copy the Issue Type into a text field and reporting on that. And then, if a ticket's issue type ever gets changed, I get to handle that use case myself, too. I get paid by the hour, so thanks I guess? But really, I have enough to do without spending time adding basic reporting functionality in to Jira.

            Sean M added a comment - - edited Managers want to use search filters for tabular reports. Putting icons in them is useless. Even when I subscribe to a filter, the email contains the icons. As a result of this I have to explain to my bosses that this is yet another tiny little niggling Jira design decision that breaks reasonable use cases. No. Please fix this. For now I will try and work around this unfortunate decision by using a 3rd party plugin to copy the Issue Type into a text field and reporting on that. And then, if a ticket's issue type ever gets changed, I get to handle that use case myself, too. I get paid by the hour, so thanks I guess? But really, I have enough to do without spending time adding basic reporting functionality in to Jira.

            Still needed

            AndrewCorvesta added a comment - Still needed

            Tony McCoy added a comment -

            There are so many basic functionality gaps in this product its not funny and people have been complaining/asking for about the same the same things for years. 

            These issues wont get the votes as people have given up asking for things to be fixed.

            Tony McCoy added a comment - There are so many basic functionality gaps in this product its not funny and people have been complaining/asking for about the same the same things for years.  These issues wont get the votes as people have given up asking for things to be fixed.

            Tim Hobbs added a comment - - edited

            Do any of these things ever get actioned?  

            This is really basic stuff, asked for years ago.  It's ridiculous that one of the most basic and important issue fields isn't readily visible in results, for no apparent reason at all.

            It's not assigned to anyone and until it gets more votes/comments nobody in the team will even look at it?

            Tim Hobbs added a comment - - edited Do any of these things ever get actioned?   This is really basic stuff, asked for years ago.  It's ridiculous that one of the most basic and important issue fields isn't readily visible in results, for no apparent reason at all. It's not assigned to anyone and until it gets more votes/comments nobody in the team will even look at it?

            This feature is especially helpful for systems that have many issue types, as pointed out above. 

            Elijah Bolas added a comment - This feature is especially helpful for systems that have many issue types, as pointed out above. 

            Amy Trolio added a comment -

             This would be super helpful!! 

            Amy Trolio added a comment -  This would be super helpful!! 

            please add this!

            Ramsay Zaki added a comment - please add this!

            It's inconvenience to show only icon of issue type when users are searching for issues.

            It would be much helpful to add this feature. Thanks.

            Stella Chang added a comment - It's inconvenience to show only icon of issue type when users are searching for issues. It would be much helpful to add this feature. Thanks.

            Please add this feature.

            With multiple in-built and custom fields with the same icons, it's hard to categorize them when the issue lists are exported.

            Ankur Shrivastava added a comment - Please add this feature. With multiple in-built and custom fields with the same icons, it's hard to categorize them when the issue lists are exported.

            Ellen O'Leary added a comment - - edited

            I would like the ability to toggle between the issue type icon and name.  Displaying the icon is a good idea if you have very few issue types, but it becomes very unpractical when there are several issue types in one instance.  As noted above, the system stores and retrieves this information anyway, it should not require a major developmental change to implement a different display.  This could be added to the Look and Feel Formatting section. 

            (Slightly related: it would be nice to have the date/time display - time stamp rather than relational text - option here too instead of manipulating a config file on the backend of the system.)

            Ellen O'Leary added a comment - - edited I would like the ability to toggle between the issue type icon and name.  Displaying the icon is a good idea if you have very few issue types, but it becomes very unpractical when there are several issue types in one instance.  As noted above, the system stores and retrieves this information anyway, it should not require a major developmental change to implement a different display.  This could be added to the Look and Feel Formatting section.  (Slightly related: it would be nice to have the date/time display - time stamp rather than relational text - option here too instead of manipulating a config file on the backend of the system.)

            Matt Doar added a comment -

            Seems like the idea of using an icon is to save screen space, but when the icons are mostly the same for 100 issue types, then that doesn't work. I see the KB suggests a change to a source vm template. I think I'd define a scripted field with ScriptRunner and display that in the search results instead of the standard Type field. The script could truncate the issue type name to something unique but not too long

            Matt Doar added a comment - Seems like the idea of using an icon is to save screen space, but when the icons are mostly the same for 100 issue types, then that doesn't work. I see the KB suggests a change to a source vm template. I think I'd define a scripted field with ScriptRunner and display that in the search results instead of the standard Type field. The script could truncate the issue type name to something unique but not too long

            Admin added a comment -

            So many of the icons look alike they serve no purpose to the user.  Trying to hover over takes more time to accomplish then it should to get the work done.  I guess, I could select some other kind of avatar, but the actual words would serve the purpose. 

            Admin added a comment - So many of the icons look alike they serve no purpose to the user.  Trying to hover over takes more time to accomplish then it should to get the work done.  I guess, I could select some other kind of avatar, but the actual words would serve the purpose. 

            Tony McCoy added a comment -

            The issue type description is one of the most important fields to the agent. Displaying it only as a hover is ridiculous.

            The agents want to see a view of issues including their type.

            Tony McCoy added a comment - The issue type description is one of the most important fields to the agent. Displaying it only as a hover is ridiculous. The agents want to see a view of issues including their type.

            Solitonman added a comment -

            I have to say it's confusing that this information isn't readily available to display, since it's obviously being retrieved - hovering over the icon for the issue type yields a pop up with the name.  So it's being inserted into the HTML for the page which means that there's some mechanism that can retrieve it.  

            Solitonman added a comment - I have to say it's confusing that this information isn't readily available to display, since it's obviously being retrieved - hovering over the icon for the issue type yields a pop up with the name.  So it's being inserted into the HTML for the page which means that there's some mechanism that can retrieve it.  

              Unassigned Unassigned
              ijimoh Ismael Olusula Jimoh (Inactive)
              Votes:
              168 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              76 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated: