Uploaded image for project: 'Jira Platform Cloud'
  1. Jira Platform Cloud
  2. JRACLOUD-92989

On the Roadmap, Epic should "adjust" the child start and due dates

    • 30
    • 5
    • Our product teams collect and evaluate feedback from a number of different sources. To learn more about how we use customer feedback in the planning process, check out our new feature policy.

      Love the new Jira Agility project type.

      I was testing adding an Epic in the Roadmap, set an end date, then added a child story, enabled due date in stories, set a due date that was after the Epic end date, but the Epic date in the graph didn't change. Shouldn't it change or at least have some warning?

      Also, would be great to have the ability to enable seeing child (Stories) alongside with Epics in the graph.

            [JRACLOUD-92989] On the Roadmap, Epic should "adjust" the child start and due dates

             

            I was testing adding an Epic in the Roadmap, set an end date, then added a child story, enabled due date in stories, set a due date that was after the Epic end date, but the Epic date in the graph didn't change. Shouldn't it change or at least have some warning?

            Note, there is a warning in the UI (probably added since this issue was first created):

            Side note: in the above screenshot I have the new Schedule child issues by dates setting enabled.

            Anusha Rutnam added a comment -   I was testing adding an Epic in the Roadmap, set an end date, then added a child story, enabled due date in stories, set a due date that was after the Epic end date, but the Epic date in the graph didn't change. Shouldn't it change or at least have some warning? Note, there is a warning in the UI (probably added since this issue was first created): Side note: in the above screenshot I have the new Schedule child issues by dates setting enabled.

            Does anyone know if this is something that might be developed in the near future? Or if there are any workarounds? 

            Ruben Dencker added a comment - Does anyone know if this is something that might be developed in the near future? Or if there are any workarounds? 

            Amar.Lebik added a comment -

            Any automation for that while waiting for the feature, please ? 

            Amar.Lebik added a comment - Any automation for that while waiting for the feature, please ? 

            Total must have for tool of this size and usage.

            Michal Novotny added a comment - Total must have for tool of this size and usage.

            deahoop added a comment -

            Absolutely! I am gobsmacked that the Due Date doesnt automatically calculate based on Start Date and Original Estimate.  I cant use this until this is done so it is back to Excel unfortunately!!!

            deahoop added a comment - Absolutely! I am gobsmacked that the Due Date doesnt automatically calculate based on Start Date and Original Estimate.  I cant use this until this is done so it is back to Excel unfortunately!!!

            This should literally be a feature already, of course epics should adjust to the date of the tasks, stories and bugs that are associated with them

            Cherie Laniyan added a comment - This should literally be a feature already, of course epics should adjust to the date of the tasks, stories and bugs that are associated with them

            This feature should be basic! It's so obvious! 

            Mikhail Sysoev added a comment - This feature should be basic! It's so obvious! 

            without this feature Excel is a better tool

            Sasha Zinchuk added a comment - without this feature Excel is a better tool

            Kire added a comment -

            This is a much much needed feature.. GitLab has a similar solution for some time now. Why is this still under consideration, i don't understand why you would consider to include or not include this feature?

            Kire added a comment - This is a much much needed feature.. GitLab has a similar solution for some time now. Why is this still under consideration, i don't understand why you would consider to include or not include this feature?

            +1 to this. Surprised this isn't how it already behaves...

            Osman Ishaq added a comment - +1 to this. Surprised this isn't how it already behaves...

              Unassigned Unassigned
              587471272300 Luis Lobo
              Votes:
              344 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              147 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated: