Uploaded image for project: 'Crucible'
  1. Crucible
  2. CRUC-6033

Add Multiple Default Moderator for Crucible Project

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Suggestion Suggestion
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • Crucible

    • Our product teams collect and evaluate feedback from a number of different sources. To learn more about how we use customer feedback in the planning process, check out our new feature policy.

      In our case, add more than one default moderator for one Crucible project is needed.

            [CRUC-6033] Add Multiple Default Moderator for Crucible Project

            Marek Parfianowicz added a comment - - edited

            Hi Markus, did you try the mandatory-reviewers-for-crucible plugin?

            Marek Parfianowicz added a comment - - edited Hi Markus, did you try the mandatory-reviewers-for-crucible plugin?

            Markus Schneider added a comment -

            Sorry, but still like to vote for "add support for optional and mandatory reviewers".

            Allow more developers participating in a code review, but ensure that some developers (senior, architect) have completed the CR.

            Configurable on project level.

            Markus Schneider added a comment - Sorry, but still like to vote for "add support for optional and mandatory reviewers". Allow more developers participating in a code review, but ensure that some developers (senior, architect) have completed the CR. Configurable on project level.

            Marek Parfianowicz added a comment -
            Atlassian Update – 20 Mar 2019

            Hi everyone,

            We have recently reviewed this issue and the overall interest in the problem. As the issue hasn't collect votes, watchers, comments, or support cases from many customers during its lifetime, it's very low on our priority list, and will not be fixed in the foreseeable future. That's why we've decided to resolve it as Not being considered.

            Although we're aware the issue is still important to those of you who were involved in the conversations around it, we want to be clear in managing your expectations. The Fisheye&Crucible team is focusing on issues that have broad impact and high value, reflected by the number of comments, votes, support cases, and customers interested. Please consult the Implementation of New Features Policy for more details.

            We understand how disappointing this decision may be, but we hope you'll appreciate our transparent approach and communication. Atlassian will continue to watch this issue for further updates, so please feel free to share your thoughts in the comments.

            Regards
            Marek Parfianowicz
            Fisheye/Crucible TL

            Marek Parfianowicz added a comment - Atlassian Update – 20 Mar 2019 Hi everyone, We have recently reviewed this issue and the overall interest in the problem. As the issue hasn't collect votes, watchers, comments, or support cases from many customers during its lifetime, it's very low on our priority list, and will not be fixed in the foreseeable future. That's why we've decided to resolve it as Not being considered . Although we're aware the issue is still important to those of you who were involved in the conversations around it, we want to be clear in managing your expectations. The Fisheye&Crucible team is focusing on issues that have broad impact and high value, reflected by the number of comments, votes, support cases, and customers interested. Please consult the Implementation of New Features Policy for more details. We understand how disappointing this decision may be, but we hope you'll appreciate our transparent approach and communication. Atlassian will continue to watch this issue for further updates, so please feel free to share your thoughts in the comments. Regards Marek Parfianowicz Fisheye/Crucible TL

            Marek Parfianowicz added a comment -

            Please have a look at similar feature request for having 'mandatory reviewers': CRUC-3808

            There is a plugin on Marketplace providing such functionality:
            https://marketplace.atlassian.com/apps/1219472/mandatory-reviewers-for-crucible

            Marek Parfianowicz added a comment - Please have a look at similar feature request for having 'mandatory reviewers': CRUC-3808 There is a plugin on Marketplace providing such functionality: https://marketplace.atlassian.com/apps/1219472/mandatory-reviewers-for-crucible

            Nick added a comment -

            You can do this now, by editing the permission scheme in use for your project.

            You need to ensure the users who you wish to grant this privilege to, have the "Close" permission.

            Nick added a comment - You can do this now, by editing the permission scheme in use for your project. You need to ensure the users who you wish to grant this privilege to, have the "Close" permission.

            Alex Merenyi added a comment - - edited

            Is this an active issue? We have several crucible projects that are open as the original author has left our firm, and we cannot close them. We need to be able to allow our end users to "administrate" these reviews and close them.

            Alex Merenyi added a comment - - edited Is this an active issue? We have several crucible projects that are open as the original author has left our firm, and we cannot close them. We need to be able to allow our end users to "administrate" these reviews and close them.

            Mike Eberhardinger added a comment -

            Having the option to add more than one moderator to a Crucible project enables flexibility for teams that need it.
            In our case, this feature was actually requested by a very important user who is the moderator for his project, and due to not being able to fulfill the role 100% of time, he asked us to add another moderator to help out.

            Mike

            Mike Eberhardinger added a comment - Having the option to add more than one moderator to a Crucible project enables flexibility for teams that need it. In our case, this feature was actually requested by a very important user who is the moderator for his project, and due to not being able to fulfill the role 100% of time, he asked us to add another moderator to help out. Mike

            PadmeshG added a comment -

            Is it possible to implement in crucible

            Lets say I have creator/creators and one moderator(s) opens a review CR-1 and 3-4 users of reviewers (Except moderator and creator). Is it possible to restrict permissions on CR-1 review so that creator/moderator approves review only when at-least 2 reviewers review the CR-1.

            Padmesh

            PadmeshG added a comment - Is it possible to implement in crucible Lets say I have creator/creators and one moderator(s) opens a review CR-1 and 3-4 users of reviewers (Except moderator and creator). Is it possible to restrict permissions on CR-1 review so that creator/moderator approves review only when at-least 2 reviewers review the CR-1. Padmesh

            Erik Van Norstrand added a comment -

            I agree with the above comments, this feature would be extremely useful for companies whose projects spam multiple divisions and/or departments!

            Erik Van Norstrand added a comment - I agree with the above comments, this feature would be extremely useful for companies whose projects spam multiple divisions and/or departments!

            Rakesh Sankar added a comment -

            Is anybody working on this feature, I realize this is useful for a big team or at least crucible should allow the super admin to control on the reviews.

            Rakesh Sankar added a comment - Is anybody working on this feature, I realize this is useful for a big team or at least crucible should allow the super admin to control on the reviews.

              Unassigned Unassigned
              459b664e81bc LYNN.JIRA
              Votes:
              15 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              13 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated: