I was surprised to find that there is not a standard, easy to get to (read: from the review's front page)
that can show the traditional code review output:
1) List all defects w/ type, location (file/line), and description (I imagine being able to filter by defects/all comments/those with JIRA issues) and potentially also listing the users involved in the discussion of each one.
2) Summarize review by # defects of each type, # each by severity, time spent by reviewer

It may be a related item rather than part of the report proper, but the moderator should be able to check off each defect from #1 above as verified.

Essentially, having a big blank box to summarize the review doesn't really capture what normally happens at the end of a review, at least from
the basic CMM perspective.