XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Suggestion
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • 5.6
    • None
    • We collect Confluence feedback from various sources, and we evaluate what we've collected when planning our product roadmap. To understand how this piece of feedback will be reviewed, see our Implementation of New Features Policy.

    Description

      (This issue has morphed from the original description of "trash a piece of content" because it's impossible to write one resource/service correctly, the first time, in isolation from other operations in the same context).

      Basically: spike the basic shape of the trash spec to get good REST URIs, service interfaces/methods, and useful model objects.

      Was:

      Per the trash spec we'll be viewing the trashing of content as a state change rather than a location change.

      To this end, it should be possible to trash a piece of content (that can be trashed) by updating it via a PUT to have a status of TRASHED. The contents of the PUT should not include any other changes to the content.

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            dtaylor David Taylor (Inactive)
            dtaylor David Taylor (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: