Details
-
Bug
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
-
Medium
-
3.1.7, 3.1.8, 3.2.0, 3.3.0, 4.0.0
-
None
-
Severity 2 - Major
Description
If the instrumentation level = method is chosen for given project and the whole project is rebuilt, we have less data in Coverage Explorer and Dashboard than we could actually have:
1) covered method is highlighted green in source editor while in coverage explorer is marked grey as it would be not instrumented at all
2) we have 'average method complexity' unavailable - reconsider whether it's OK or maybe we should have some artificial value for it, for example:
- 1.0 for every method or
- number of source lines
3) Dashboard does not show least tested methods; and we can actually do this because we have 0% or 100% of coverage for methods; so we could choose those with 0% of coverage; question whether we should take all or in some random order or few first alphabetically or take artificial complexity (see point 2) value?
See screenshot.