Andrzej Giniewicz added a comment - 18/Jul/2014 9:03 AM it is compiler plugins with three runners (SBT, Gradle and Maven). In case of SBT it copies test in Test and runs as test in Scoverage (sbt scoverage:test) but all setup is shared. It then creates two xml reports, one compatible with Cobertura, exactly this is DOCTYPE: http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/xml/coverage-04.dtd - and other one with its own syntax. This is part of scoverage.xml from project with almost no tests that we work on now: <scoverage statement-count= "1379" statements-invoked= "152" statement-rate= "11,02" branch-rate= "6,63" version= "1.0" timestamp= "1405633646344" > <packages> <package name= "com.specdevs.specgine.animation" statement-count= "119" statements-invoked= "9" statement-rate= "7,56" > <classes> <class name= "TweenId" filename= "/animation/TweenId.scala" statement-count= "1" statements-invoked= "0" statement-rate= "0,00" branch-rate= "100,00" > <methods> <method name= "com.specdevs.specgine.animation/TweenId/&lt;none&gt;" statement-count= "1" statements-invoked= "0" statement-rate= "0,00" branch-rate= "100,00" > <statements> <statement package= "com.specdevs.specgine.animation" class= "TweenId" method= "&lt;none&gt;" start= "598" line= "19" symbol= "com.specdevs.specgine.animation.TweenId.&lt;init&gt;" tree= "Apply" branch= "false" invocation-count= "0" > </statement> </statements> </method> </methods> </class> and same in cobertura syntax: <?xml version= "1.0" ?> <!DOCTYPE coverage SYSTEM "http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/xml/coverage-04.dtd" > <coverage line-rate= "11,02" lines-covered= "1379" lines-valid= "152" branches-covered= "166" branches-valid= "11" branch-rate= "6,63" complexity= "0" version= "1.0" timestamp= "1405633645883" > <sources> <source> /src/main/scala </source> </sources> <packages> <package name= "com.specdevs.specgine.animation" line-rate= "7,56" branch-rate= "8,33" complexity= "0" > <classes> <class name= "TweenId" filename= "src/main/scala/animation/TweenId.scala" line-rate= "0,00" branch-rate= "100,00" complexity= "0" > <methods> <method name= "com.specdevs.specgine.animation/TweenId/&lt;none&gt;" signature= "()V" line-rate= "0,00" branch-rate= "100,00" > <lines> <line number= "19" hits= "0" branch= "false" /> </lines> </method> </methods> <lines> <line number= "19" hits= "0" branch= "false" /> </lines> </class>

Marek Parfianowicz added a comment - 18/Jul/2014 8:48 AM How does this tool work by the way? Does it create some database during compilation (like the clover.db)? Does it produce coverage recording files when executed? I didn't have time to look into its sources...

Andrzej Giniewicz added a comment - 18/Jul/2014 8:45 AM I'm glad it can help. I currently use it for my project, turning it on was very easy (had no luck with SCCT earlier due to complicated project setup) and it even works for my macros subpackage. In my opinion it has only 2 flaws: no way to merge reports from subprojects into one report ( https://github.com/scoverage/sbt-scoverage/issues/13 ), and crashe of coverage gathering when macro bundles are used ( https://github.com/scoverage/scalac-scoverage-plugin/issues/43 ). Other than that it works perfectly for most uses. Also outside of Scoverage, hurting all coverage gathering solutions for Scala, there is https://github.com/scoverage/sbt-scoverage#wheres-the-pretty-output-gone - but for my project it did not occured and colour output worked normally in Scala 2.11.1.

Marek Parfianowicz added a comment - 18/Jul/2014 5:51 AM Thanks a lot for a link. Indeed, it's an interesting tool and as it's based on the Apache 2.0 license, it should be possible to integrate it with Clover.

Andrzej Giniewicz added a comment - 17/Jul/2014 4:49 PM I'm really waiting to see this. I don't know if it can help, but there is also http://scoverage.org/

Marek Parfianowicz added a comment - 31/Oct/2013 3:13 PM See also http://mtkopone.github.io/scct/