Uploaded image for project: 'Bitbucket Data Center'
  1. Bitbucket Data Center
  2. BSERV-2755

Diff for merge conflicts in development branches

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Suggestion Suggestion
    • Resolution: Duplicate
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • We collect Bitbucket feedback from various sources, and we evaluate what we've collected when planning our product roadmap. To understand how this piece of feedback will be reviewed, see our Implementation of New Features Policy.

      It would be great if Stash could do diffs/dry-run merges of multiple developer branches, and identify future merge conflicts before they happen. The pull request idea is great for figuring out merge conflicts with master, but what about merge conflicts with new work being done on other branches? They'll all get merged into master at some point.

      In the following scenario, the VP of Engineering wants everyone to commit to master, in order to prevent merge conflicts down the line, so devs will know immediately if they're stepping on someone else's toes. But this means we're treating git just like subversion, trading 'svn update' for 'git pull --rebase'. If we can check for merge conflicts between existing non-master branches, we could give him what he wants and still maintain the functionality of Pull Requests.

            Unassigned Unassigned
            dfabretti Douglas Fabretti [Atlassian]
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            4 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: