-
Bug
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Medium
I have the following project structure:
doc/
getting_started.md
...
readme.md
In my readme.md file, I link to the getting_started.md document like so:
[Get started](doc/getting_started.md)
When viewing the readme.md file in the source tab this link 404's (it points to ../project/doc/contributing.md)
But when I click on the readme.md file and view it, the link works (correctly points to ../project/src/31...8e/doc/contributing.md)
There is a (possibly?) subtly different problem for relative links in sub-folders. Given the project structure of:
doc/
style/
markdown.md
readme.md
top_level_readme.md
In the readme.md file, if I have a link to style/markdown.md as follows:
[Markdown Style Guide](style/markdown.md)
It will break in a similar manner to the above (50% of the time), but with the following urls:
Overview page links to: ../project/src/31...8e/style/markdown.md
While viewing readme.md links to: ../project/src/31...8e/doc/style/markdown.md
[BCLOUD-6315] Relative urls in readme.md files only work half the time. (BB-7521)
Just FYI this is still broken in branches other than master: BCLOUD-16322
The fix i tried is just quite simple:
so base URL: {{https://bitbucket.org/
{project}/{repo}/{branch}/README.md}}bq. README.md file
[README.md](./subfolder/README.md
If i clicked that with a different branch, it is going to return a full git log like 2ec0707bc23f8a6cc3d78d5097 into the url.
so base URL: {{https://bitbucket.org/{project}
/
{repo}/2ec0707bc23f8a6cc3d78d5097/subfolder/README.md}}
FYI. I am just passing by
The relative URL doesn't work if the file is at branch other than master branch. Can't it be fixed?
@johnburbridge in 2020 only ? ... before this date, i think someone will find a justification for not do nothing more for repair what has been broken. Now they make high school level for teach to daddy's boys how to argument the way to not do nothing as a best concept.
And in the same time, an other one will provide a way to paid easy 100$ by month for see this features back, like magic.
what a wonderful world...
I am sorry but this is a functionality GitHub has provided for years and it's rather a fundamental one I think. We have visual diffs of images in pull requests and whatever but before we need these extra features, we'd like to simply have existing features work and show the images. Thanks.
Given the track record on this thread, I'll check back for a resolution in June, 2020.
I agree with @Spaceport. Can you guys upvote @Spaceport's new issue to help this to get eventually fixed?
I think it is still broken