-
Suggestion
-
Resolution: Fixed
The Amazon implementation of a Docker Registry automatically generates the docker login command with a call to the aws API. The credentials that it generates expire making them impractical to mine from the command for a normal bitbucket-pipelines.yml file. As far as I can tell, there is no way to set Amazon to do it differently, so if we could specify AWS credentials as follows:
#!yaml
image:
name: <aws-ecr-image>
aws_login:
access_key_id: <access_key_id>
secret_access_key: <secret_access_key>
region: <region>
Then Pipelines could generate a file at ~/.aws/credentials that looks like this:
#!ini
[default]
aws_access_key_id = <access_key_id>
aws_secret_access_key = <secret_access_key>
Then make the following AWS call to get the credentials and login:
#!bash eval $(aws ecr get-login --region <region>)
It could then proceed to download the Docker image and continue normally.
Alternatively, the values could be settings on the server side to avoid sharing all that information in a file in source control.
[BCLOUD-13024] Support Amazon ECR for build image
Hi @phodder,
Thank you, for your reply.
Is there any similar coming for bitbucket pipeline?
Furthermore, is there any guideline in relation to once pushes to ECR it automatically deploys the new build to ECS Cluster?
Regards,
Javed Gardezi
Hi @jgardezi,
This feature is only to add native support for pulling images from ECR as the container your build runs inside, as this was previously not possible to do without extensive workarounds.
Pushing images to ECR remains the same as you are doing right now (setting up auth for docker and then using docker commands to push).
This ticket here may be closer to what you are requesting (steps that take parameters and can do more complex operations): BCLOUD-12751
Thanks,
Phil
@sebastian_cole can you please elaborate the step in more details. For this
#!bash
image:
name: <aws_account_id>.dkr.ecr.<region>.amazonaws.com/java:8u66
aws:
access-key: $AWS_ACCESS_KEY
secret-key: $AWS_SECRET_KEY
How do I push my image to ECR with your script? Currently, my way of doing is
#!bash
- step:
name: Build & Register image with production registery
# python image with aws-cli installed
image: tstrohmeier/awscli:3.6.3
script:
# aws login
- echo Logging in to Amazon ECR...
- eval $(aws ecr get-login --region ${AWS_DEFAULT_REGION} --no-include-email)
# docker
- export BUILD_ID=$BITBUCKET_BRANCH_$BITBUCKET_COMMIT_$BITBUCKET_BUILD_NUMBER
- docker build -t ${AWS_REGISTRY_URL}:$BUILD_ID .
- docker push ${AWS_REGISTRY_URL}:$BUILD_ID
- docker tag ${AWS_REGISTRY_URL}:$BUILD_ID ${AWS_REGISTRY_URL}:development
- docker push ${AWS_REGISTRY_URL}:development
As you can see that I can build the docker image and pushing it ECR using mage: tstrohmeier/awscli:3.6.3. How does your support (We've just enabled ECR support for all customers) help us to do the above steps?
Kind regards,
Javed Gardezi
Wow, as I post this (after trying various things last night)... I found what the problem is.
It is one of two things, either the space/return between the image code-block and the pipelines code-block, in the yaml is not supported, or the format ${} is not supported.
Hi, I am having no joy with this. I added a question, here https://community.atlassian.com/t5/Bitbucket-questions/How-to-allow-Bitbucket-Pipelines-to-pull-images-from-Amazon-EC2/qaq-p/633458
Would really appreciate some feedback.
@ccannell this is for pulling the step image where your scripts get executed. If you're building and pushing from pipelines, you'll follow the same process as normal.
eval $(aws ecr get-login --region <region>) docker push registry.com/user/format
While Amazon has strict guidelines in place, scammers can still slip through the cracks. It's crucial to thoroughly research the seller's reputation, read customer reviews, and be wary of suspiciously low prices. This advice really hit home for me, as I've been tempted by those too-good-to-be-true deals in the past, for more read https://qrius.com/common-amazon-scams-and-how-to-avoid-them/ . Another scam that caught my attention was the "brushing" scam. I had never heard of this before, but apparently, scammers send unsolicited packages to unsuspecting customers and then post fake positive reviews using their names. This not only deceives potential buyers but also compromises the privacy of innocent individuals. It's a chilling reminder of the importance of monitoring our online presence and being vigilant about any unexpected packages we receive. Counterfeit goods are becoming increasingly prevalent, and it's essential to scrutinize the seller's credentials, check for trademarks, and compare prices to ensure you're getting the real deal. I appreciated the tips provided in the article, as they will undoubtedly help me make more informed purchasing decisions in the future.