-
Suggestion
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
None
-
None
Summary
When using the Google Sheets integration, there are some fields that contain "sub-rows" to be selected.
For example, Sprint, Linked issues:
The values in the main field are static, meaning that they don't change based on the selections. The result might be misleading for users since there will be duplicate rows.
For example, when it comes to linked issues, if you select Linked Issues.linkType along with the main field Linked Issues, you will see multiple rows of the same issue because the integration needs to show a row for each link type corresponding to each linked issue. But since the Linked Issues value is static, it will show all linked issues in the same cell in all rows, despite those being associated with the link type displayed in the row or not:
PS. In the case above, you should go for Linked Issues.id instead of the main Linked Issues field to have a more accurate result.
Suggestion
Make the main fields' column results adapt to the sub-rows selected. Or, give more configuration options to users so they can choose the behaviour.
- mentioned in
-
Page Failed to load
Form Name |
---|
Thanks for the explanation, Rahul.
I understand the limitation although I still think the duplication makes it very hard for the information to be consumed in Sheets. If you think about the reasoning behind people using Sheets with Jira, it's certainly related to the ability to consume that information by manipulating, extracting, and using it for statistics and reporting. In my use case, I automatically pull data from Jira on a schedule and consume that through very complex formulas in Sheets. And with the duplication of records, it becomes practically impossible to address those situations through formulas or without consolidating those rows into one row manually - which completely defeats the purpose of the automation we do in Sheets.
I also understand that fields that may have a lot of information such as the ones you've mentioned make it difficult for them to be in the same row but on the other hand, duplicating records simply because I need to know the sprint name or goal doesn't make any sense.
For larger field content such as worklog comments, I wouldn't mind seeing them consolidated in the same row with a breakline between them. Anyway, I'm surprised to see people actually ask for row expansion...
Again, it makes a lot more sense to have them in a single row. Row expansion should be an optional feature that you can select instead.
Also, the current UI doesn't inform users about the duplication which really leads them to believe this is a bug, not a feature.
Sorry but I strongly believe you guys went the other way from what's more intuitive without even communicating that in the UI upon fields selection.
Not sure if there's a solution to this but just wanted to throw my perspective out there.
Thanks again.
Cheers.