Uploaded image for project: 'Jira Service Management Cloud'
  1. Jira Service Management Cloud
  2. JSDCLOUD-3729

Adding the possibility of setting the 'Reporter' as a default value for hidden Approvers

    • Icon: Suggestion Suggestion
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Approvals
    • 2
    • Our product teams collect and evaluate feedback from a number of different sources. To learn more about how we use customer feedback in the planning process, check out our new feature policy.

      NOTE: This suggestion is for JIRA Service Desk Cloud. Using JIRA Service Desk Server? See the corresponding suggestion.

      Currently for approvals you are able to select custom user fields as approvers, however you are not able to use the reporter field as a user field for approvals. It will be nice to have the ability to use reporters as approvers for the approval functionality.

            [JSDCLOUD-3729] Adding the possibility of setting the 'Reporter' as a default value for hidden Approvers

            Hi,

            This can be achieved by using a post function or an automation rule to add the Reporter to the user field being used by the Approvals system.

            We do not intend to provide specific functionality for this.

            Cheers,
            Jason

            Jason D'Cruz added a comment - Hi, This can be achieved by using a post function or an automation rule to add the Reporter to the user field being used by the Approvals system. We do not intend to provide specific functionality for this. Cheers, Jason

            Tim Duly added a comment -

            There is a workaround for this.

            Add a post function to the 'Create Issue' transition in your workflow to copy the 'Reporter' field value to the 'Approvers' field.

            Tim Duly added a comment - There is a workaround for this. Add a post function to the 'Create Issue' transition in your workflow to copy the 'Reporter' field value to the 'Approvers' field.

            Tim Duly added a comment -

            This would be a useful feature as it would automatically mean that a reporter would have to 'approve' their own ticket. In the case of a service desk this is useful as tickets can get raised by the reporter. However, they may not be ready for the service desk to review. Adding this approval step allows the reporter to choose when the service desk should look at it.

            A flow similar to below:
            1. reporter raises ticket
            2. reporter gathers additional information required to support the ticket (eg logs, docs, screenshots etc)
            3. reporter than 'Approves' the ticket thereby highlighting to the service desk that it is ready for their review
            4. Service desk team review the ticket

            You could also use the reporter as the person who approves that the ticket is 'Done' (ie done to their satisfaction)

            Tim Duly added a comment - This would be a useful feature as it would automatically mean that a reporter would have to 'approve' their own ticket. In the case of a service desk this is useful as tickets can get raised by the reporter. However, they may not be ready for the service desk to review. Adding this approval step allows the reporter to choose when the service desk should look at it. A flow similar to below: 1. reporter raises ticket 2. reporter gathers additional information required to support the ticket (eg logs, docs, screenshots etc) 3. reporter than 'Approves' the ticket thereby highlighting to the service desk that it is ready for their review 4. Service desk team review the ticket You could also use the reporter as the person who approves that the ticket is 'Done' (ie done to their satisfaction)

              jdcruz Jason D'Cruz
              vwong@atlassian.com vwong
              Votes:
              28 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              15 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: