Details
-
Bug
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Medium
-
4.4
-
None
-
4.04
-
Description
JIRA does not use JDBC transactions when performing a bulk move or single issue move. This can lead to workflow tables pointer mismatches like we saw recently on support.atlassian.com
However we do use JDBC transactions on Issue Transition and Bulk Workflow Migration. So we have a code precedence for bits of code that move issues and their workflow state.
We should add the transaction support to the places where we changed workflow state.
I realize that there is a much bigger question about using transactions in general however that is another issue and would have more profound consequences. We should attack this piece meal to ensure the best result for the least impact.
Attachments
Issue Links
- mentioned in
-
Page Loading...