Uploaded image for project: 'Jira Software Data Center'
  1. Jira Software Data Center
  2. JSWSERVER-519

Assignee names are cut off and illegable on small cards in 2.5.1

      This used to work fine - now they are cut off. We really need this fixed to use 2.5.1
      See attached screenshot before and after.

      Seems the corner card field is taking up way more space than it used to. Possible for us to get a quick fix for this issue since we were waiting on 2.5.1 and currently running 2.4

            [JSWSERVER-519] Assignee names are cut off and illegable on small cards in 2.5.1

            JC added a comment -

            Ok I figured how to set the width of the corner.
            It was tricky but works in IE also.

            We should have everything back to normal now.
            I will deploy this on our production server to see if it holds good.

            I have taken off the label also to gain space.

            Cheers,

            JC added a comment - Ok I figured how to set the width of the corner. It was tricky but works in IE also. We should have everything back to normal now. I will deploy this on our production server to see if it holds good. I have taken off the label also to gain space. Cheers,

            I agree dropping the label name makes a lot of sense for the bottom left field - especially since field names can be very long!

            Chris Brookins added a comment - I agree dropping the label name makes a lot of sense for the bottom left field - especially since field names can be very long!

            I see on the GH task board you swapped the assignee fields to make it legable in your card configuration. But this seems awk to force all GH users to change their config.

            If you cannot dynamically resize the bottom right corner field to be smaller if showing a smaller field, what I would like (as reported in another bug) is to not show the label "Assignee:" at all. e.g. for any field in the small card there is no reason to show the label for that bottom left corner field. We all know what that field is because we configured it and if we wanted to know, you could allow hovering over that field to see a tooltip that said "Assignee: cbrookins" or something like that....

            Chris Brookins added a comment - I see on the GH task board you swapped the assignee fields to make it legable in your card configuration. But this seems awk to force all GH users to change their config. If you cannot dynamically resize the bottom right corner field to be smaller if showing a smaller field, what I would like (as reported in another bug) is to not show the label "Assignee:" at all. e.g. for any field in the small card there is no reason to show the label for that bottom left corner field. We all know what that field is because we configured it and if we wanted to know, you could allow hovering over that field to see a tooltip that said "Assignee: cbrookins" or something like that....

            JC added a comment -

            Yeah you are right.
            In IE we cant fix the size of the corner
            Seems like the pathched we used fixes the corner to 50% in both IE and Firefox. wich causes a problem in the Taskboard.

            The workaround for now would be to switch your fields
            Assignee in the corner - Remaining as the last checked row in your summary
            Or buy a wide screen !!! even better a wide Smartscreen !!!

            What I think we will do is basically withdraw the label of the field if it is the last one in the summary and put it as a tooltip.

            God help us! we need more space!

            Cheers,

            JC added a comment - Yeah you are right. In IE we cant fix the size of the corner Seems like the pathched we used fixes the corner to 50% in both IE and Firefox. wich causes a problem in the Taskboard. The workaround for now would be to switch your fields Assignee in the corner - Remaining as the last checked row in your summary Or buy a wide screen !!! even better a wide Smartscreen !!! What I think we will do is basically withdraw the label of the field if it is the last one in the summary and put it as a tooltip. God help us! we need more space! Cheers,

            I attached 1 more screenshot to show that the problem has nothing to do with 3 lines of summary text for a true apples to apples comparison

            Chris Brookins added a comment - I attached 1 more screenshot to show that the problem has nothing to do with 3 lines of summary text for a true apples to apples comparison

              jchuet JC
              6d80a6d00f16 Chris Brookins
              Affected customers:
              0 This affects my team
              Watchers:
              0 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - 5h
                  5h
                  Remaining:
                  Remaining Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 5h
                  5h