-
Suggestion
-
Resolution: Won't Do
-
None
-
None
-
2
-
Now that the StatusCategory property exists, it would be much easier to work with Epics if the behavior around the "Epic Status" field could be deprecated in favor of the StatusCategory property.
A PO would set-up a Kanban board to work with (and eventually plan - see GHS-6175) Epic-level items and this would be reflected in the Scrum boards automatically.
- is related to
-
JSWSERVER-9222 Closed epics should be automatically marked as "done" in plan mode
- Gathering Interest
- mentioned in
-
Page Failed to load
[JSWSERVER-10836] As a PO, I want the Epic status field to match the StatusCategory of the Epic so that I can work with a Kanban board
Workflow | Original: JAC Suggestion Workflow [ 3068961 ] | New: JAC Suggestion Workflow 3 [ 3659619 ] |
Status | Original: RESOLVED [ 5 ] | New: Closed [ 6 ] |
Remote Link | New: This issue links to "Page (Confluence)" [ 429795 ] |
Workflow | Original: Confluence Workflow - Public Facing v4 [ 2623335 ] | New: JAC Suggestion Workflow [ 3068961 ] |
Resolution | New: Won't Do [ 10000 ] | |
Status | Original: Gathering Interest [ 11772 ] | New: Resolved [ 5 ] |
Support reference count | New: 2 |
Workflow | Original: JIRA PM Feature Request Workflow v2 - TEMP [ 2323826 ] | New: Confluence Workflow - Public Facing v4 [ 2623335 ] |
Status | Original: Open [ 1 ] | New: Gathering Interest [ 11772 ] |
Workflow | Original: JIRA PM Feature Request Workflow v2 [ 2041904 ] | New: JIRA PM Feature Request Workflow v2 - TEMP [ 2323826 ] |
Workflow | Original: JIRA PM Feature Request Workflow v2 - TEMP [ 2029932 ] | New: JIRA PM Feature Request Workflow v2 [ 2041904 ] |
Workflow | Original: JIRA PM Feature Request Workflow v2 [ 735840 ] | New: JIRA PM Feature Request Workflow v2 - TEMP [ 2029932 ] |
Hi,
Thank you for raising this suggestion. We regret to inform you that due to limited demand, we have no plans to implement it in the foreseeable future. In order to set expectations, we're closing this request now. Sometimes potentially valuable tickets do get closed where the Summary or Description has not caught the attention of the community. If you feel that this suggestion is valuable, consider describing in more detail or outlining how this request will help you achieve your goals. We may then be able to provide better guidance.
For more context, check out our Community blog on our renewed approach to highly voted Server suggestions for Jira and Confluence.
Thanks again.
Regards,
Jira Product Management