• Our product teams collect and evaluate feedback from a number of different sources. To learn more about how we use customer feedback in the planning process, check out our new feature policy.

      NOTE: This suggestion is for JIRA Cloud. Using JIRA Server? See the corresponding suggestion.

      Thanks for trying out our early look at our next release. You can download the latest EAP release (milestone build, beta or release candidate) here.

      Please read through Preparing for JIRA 6.2 if you are a plugin developer.

      We really appreciate you taking the time to provide us any feedback on the contents of the EAP.

      Simply comment below for any comments you may have.

            [JRACLOUD-35317] EAP Feedback - JIRA 6.2

            Atlassian Update - June 2, 2021

            Hi everyone,

            Thank you for bringing this suggestion to our attention.

            As explained in our new feature policy, there are many factors that influence our product roadmaps and determine the features we implement. When making decisions about what to prioritize and work on, we combine your feedback and suggestions with insights from our support teams, product analytics, research findings, and more. This information, combined with our medium- and long-term product and platform vision, determines what we implement and its priority order.

            Unfortunately, as a result of inactivity (no votes or comments for an extended period of time), this suggestion didn’t make it to the roadmap and we are closing it.

            While this issue has been closed, our Product Managers continue to look at requests in https://jira.atlassian.com as they develop their roadmap, including closed ones. In addition, if you feel like this suggestion is still important to your team please let us know by commenting on this ticket.

            Thank you again for providing valuable feedback to our team!

            Matthew Hunter added a comment - Atlassian Update - June 2, 2021 Hi everyone, Thank you for bringing this suggestion to our attention. As explained in our new feature policy , there are many factors that influence our product roadmaps and determine the features we implement. When making decisions about what to prioritize and work on, we combine your feedback and suggestions with insights from our support teams, product analytics, research findings, and more. This information, combined with our medium- and long-term product and platform vision, determines what we implement and its priority order. Unfortunately, as a result of inactivity (no votes or comments for an extended period of time), this suggestion didn’t make it to the roadmap and we are closing it. While this issue has been closed, our Product Managers continue to look at requests in https://jira.atlassian.com as they develop their roadmap, including closed ones. In addition, if you feel like this suggestion is still important to your team please let us know by commenting on this ticket. Thank you again for providing valuable feedback to our team!

            For the Audit Log I would like to see Role added. It tells me when A Role is deleted but not when one is added. Seems odd that it is only one way.

            Jenifer Kuntz added a comment - For the Audit Log I would like to see Role added. It tells me when A Role is deleted but not when one is added. Seems odd that it is only one way.

            For the auditing, is CSV the only format available for export? Any plans for other formats?

            Joe Wai Tye (Inactive) added a comment - For the auditing, is CSV the only format available for export? Any plans for other formats?

            JIRA (v6.2-rc1#6252-sha1:c8fda5e) , with no mail servers configured, adding one results in a NPE in a comparator

            java.lang.NullPointerException
            java.lang.NullPointerException
            	at com.atlassian.jira.plugins.mail.webwork.AddSmtpMailServer$1.compare(AddSmtpMailServer.java:46)
            	at com.atlassian.jira.plugins.mail.webwork.AddSmtpMailServer$1.compare(AddSmtpMailServer.java:42)
            	at java.util.TreeMap.put(TreeMap.java:530)
            	at java.util.TreeSet.add(TreeSet.java:238)
            	at java.util.AbstractCollection.addAll(AbstractCollection.java:305)
            	at java.util.TreeSet.addAll(TreeSet.java:295)
            	at com.atlassian.jira.plugins.mail.webwork.AddSmtpMailServer.doDefault(AddSmtpMailServer.java:52)
            

            Andy Brook [Plugin People] added a comment - JIRA (v6.2-rc1#6252-sha1:c8fda5e) , with no mail servers configured, adding one results in a NPE in a comparator java.lang.NullPointerException java.lang.NullPointerException at com.atlassian.jira.plugins.mail.webwork.AddSmtpMailServer$1.compare(AddSmtpMailServer.java:46) at com.atlassian.jira.plugins.mail.webwork.AddSmtpMailServer$1.compare(AddSmtpMailServer.java:42) at java.util.TreeMap.put(TreeMap.java:530) at java.util.TreeSet.add(TreeSet.java:238) at java.util.AbstractCollection.addAll(AbstractCollection.java:305) at java.util.TreeSet.addAll(TreeSet.java:295) at com.atlassian.jira.plugins.mail.webwork.AddSmtpMailServer.doDefault(AddSmtpMailServer.java:52)

            I keep running in to the following error trying to push in the data from our production system to test.
            System Ubuntu 12.04LTS VM
            2GB Ram
            psql database

            Error:
            2014-01-29 15:37:41,920 JiraImportTaskExecutionThread-1 ERROR Admin 925x192x1 17id0gl 127.0.0.1 /secure/admin/XmlRestore.jspa [atlassian.jira.upgrade.UpgradeManagerImpl] Exception thrown during upgrade: java.lang.RuntimeException: com.opensymphony.workflow.FactoryException: Error converting XML to workflow descriptor.: root cause: Attribute "name" is required and must be specified for element type "action". (line:425 col:26)

            How I have tried to get this to run.
            On our Sandbox server i tried an upgrade and it failed with the same error. On my VM i tried to import during setup then fully setup jira and tried to restore.

            Update: on the 6.2 Beta I am getting the same error trying to push in the data.

            Deleted Account (Inactive) added a comment - - edited I keep running in to the following error trying to push in the data from our production system to test. System Ubuntu 12.04LTS VM 2GB Ram psql database Error: 2014-01-29 15:37:41,920 JiraImportTaskExecutionThread-1 ERROR Admin 925x192x1 17id0gl 127.0.0.1 /secure/admin/XmlRestore.jspa [atlassian.jira.upgrade.UpgradeManagerImpl] Exception thrown during upgrade: java.lang.RuntimeException: com.opensymphony.workflow.FactoryException: Error converting XML to workflow descriptor.: root cause: Attribute "name" is required and must be specified for element type "action". (line:425 col:26) How I have tried to get this to run. On our Sandbox server i tried an upgrade and it failed with the same error. On my VM i tried to import during setup then fully setup jira and tried to restore. Update: on the 6.2 Beta I am getting the same error trying to push in the data.

            Andrew added a comment -

            Feedback from Mike Girgis on the Auditing documentation (see comment):
            "All events relating to shared objects should be audited. All events relating to add-ons should be audited."

            Andrew added a comment - Feedback from Mike Girgis on the Auditing documentation ( see comment ): "All events relating to shared objects should be audited. All events relating to add-ons should be audited."

            Hey martin.brueggemann!

            Thanks for your comment. I agree, there is a lot of LDAP synchronisation events that are there and I agree it may be difficult to see the other events in there. In upcoming EAP and OD releases we will fix that by ignoring some of the events which we found to be of little value, but also by providing you with filtering capabilities embedded into GUI. Stay tuned.

            Bartosz Gatz (Inactive) added a comment - Hey martin.brueggemann ! Thanks for your comment. I agree, there is a lot of LDAP synchronisation events that are there and I agree it may be difficult to see the other events in there. In upcoming EAP and OD releases we will fix that by ignoring some of the events which we found to be of little value, but also by providing you with filtering capabilities embedded into GUI. Stay tuned.

            MartinB added a comment -

            Re Bartek and Matt:

            In its current setup, the auditing table contains a lot of white noise.
            IMHO it's a must to be able to at least sort the table - better: to filter out event levels or sources.
            (as is done in every IDE, where I can tell the compiler to only show warning and errors)

            MartinB added a comment - Re Bartek and Matt: In its current setup, the auditing table contains a lot of white noise. IMHO it's a must to be able to at least sort the table - better: to filter out event levels or sources. (as is done in every IDE, where I can tell the compiler to only show warning and errors)

            Hi matt.doar,

            Thanks for your comments. The list of recommended events to take a stab at next will be very helpful for us in the prioritisation effort.

            Mind that the following events from your recommendations are already monitored:

            • user name and full name change plus user creation and deletion
            • change group membership changes (users being added or removed from a group) plus group creation and deletion
            • permission and permission scheme creation, deletion and change (also including global permissions)

            Bartosz Gatz (Inactive) added a comment - Hi matt.doar , Thanks for your comments. The list of recommended events to take a stab at next will be very helpful for us in the prioritisation effort. Mind that the following events from your recommendations are already monitored: user name and full name change plus user creation and deletion change group membership changes (users being added or removed from a group) plus group creation and deletion permission and permission scheme creation, deletion and change (also including global permissions)

            Josh Devenny added a comment - - edited

            If anyone would like to provide feedback on changes to the WFD, please see: JRA-33692

            Josh Devenny added a comment - - edited If anyone would like to provide feedback on changes to the WFD, please see: JRA-33692

            Holger Schimanski added a comment - - edited

            I tried to start my plugin JIRA Project Role Tab with m04 with test data and got the following "license too old" error message

            localhost-startStop-1 ERROR      [atlassian.jira.license.LicenseJohnsonEventRaiserImpl] The current license is too old (14/Mai/13) to run this version (6.2-m04 - Tue Nov 19 00:00:00 CET 2013) of JIRA.
            localhost-startStop-1 ERROR      [atlassian.jira.upgrade.UpgradeLauncher] No upgrade is being performed due to detected inconsistencies. The current license is too old to install this version of JIRA (6.2-m04)
            

            Any idea, what's going on? My plugin does not require a license. It seams, that some JIRA internal stuff is requiring a new one?

            Holger Schimanski added a comment - - edited I tried to start my plugin JIRA Project Role Tab with m04 with test data and got the following "license too old" error message localhost-startStop-1 ERROR [atlassian.jira.license.LicenseJohnsonEventRaiserImpl] The current license is too old (14/Mai/13) to run this version (6.2-m04 - Tue Nov 19 00:00:00 CET 2013) of JIRA. localhost-startStop-1 ERROR [atlassian.jira.upgrade.UpgradeLauncher] No upgrade is being performed due to detected inconsistencies. The current license is too old to install this version of JIRA (6.2-m04) Any idea, what's going on? My plugin does not require a license. It seams, that some JIRA internal stuff is requiring a new one?

            MattS added a comment -

            For the new auditing feature, I see from the m4 release notes that the current list of things recorded is

            user added, updated or deleted
            group added, updated or deleted
            permission added ore removed from permission scheme
            permission scheme created, updated or deleted
            workflow created, updated or deleted
            audit system enabled or disabled

            Other questions and the actions that I recall looking up in recent years with the JIRA Auditor plugin are:

            User name/id changed (that may be "user updated" above)

            Group membership changed (that may be "group updated" above)

            Screen, Screen Scheme, Issue Type Screen Scheme - updated. "Who made that field appear in my screen?"

            Custom Field added, updated. "Who added all these new custom fields?"

            Field Configuration, Field Configuration Scheme - updated. "Who made this field required?"

            then lower priority:

            Status, Resolution, Issue Types add, updated, deleted - "what is this new issue type, who can I ask about it?"

            Indexing - who started that last reindex and how long did it take?

            Permissions Schemes, Issue Security Schemes,

            Overall I think that deciding what to audit is often best decided by coming up with the questions that JIRA administrators ask, e.g. the great "where's my field" functionality that was added a few versions ago

            MattS added a comment - For the new auditing feature, I see from the m4 release notes that the current list of things recorded is user added, updated or deleted group added, updated or deleted permission added ore removed from permission scheme permission scheme created, updated or deleted workflow created, updated or deleted audit system enabled or disabled Other questions and the actions that I recall looking up in recent years with the JIRA Auditor plugin are: User name/id changed (that may be "user updated" above) Group membership changed (that may be "group updated" above) Screen, Screen Scheme, Issue Type Screen Scheme - updated. "Who made that field appear in my screen?" Custom Field added, updated. "Who added all these new custom fields?" Field Configuration, Field Configuration Scheme - updated. "Who made this field required?" then lower priority: Status, Resolution, Issue Types add, updated, deleted - "what is this new issue type, who can I ask about it?" Indexing - who started that last reindex and how long did it take? Permissions Schemes, Issue Security Schemes, Overall I think that deciding what to audit is often best decided by coming up with the questions that JIRA administrators ask, e.g. the great "where's my field" functionality that was added a few versions ago

            MattS added a comment -

            I added a link to JRA-36513 about not being able to distinguish different sub-task's statuses that have the same color (category)

            MattS added a comment - I added a link to JRA-36513 about not being able to distinguish different sub-task's statuses that have the same color (category)

            Paul Huang added a comment - - edited

            how is this program going? do many folks try the EAP downloads and provide feedback? How do the EAP bits compare with the OD bits? I.e will 6.2-OD4 be on-par with 6.2-m4?

            Paul Huang added a comment - - edited how is this program going? do many folks try the EAP downloads and provide feedback? How do the EAP bits compare with the OD bits? I.e will 6.2-OD4 be on-par with 6.2-m4?

              Unassigned Unassigned
              shoughton Simone Houghton
              Votes:
              2 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              22 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: