-
Suggestion
-
Resolution: Timed out
-
0
-
3
-
NOTE: This suggestion is for JIRA Cloud. Using JIRA Server? See the corresponding suggestion.
Basically, customer mention about the accuracy of Average Age Chart Gadget is affected when there is a user reopen a very old dated issue to modify the resolution as the chart will always take in issues with any latest resolution date changes.
Customer Feedback:
lately a question occured about the behaviour of the average age chart gadget. A colleague uses this chart to monitor the age of issues in some projects that we use for support. This week he looked at the chart and all the bars in the average age chart had risen from about 10 to 14 days to more then 100 days.
After a short investigation I found that he had previously reopened a 2-year old issue in order to change the resolution. So the issue also got a new resolution date. The new resolution date of that issue caused the average age gadget to "think" the issue has been unresolved before and therefore included the issue in the calculation of the average age for the past days, weeks and months. I think this behaviour is not right and distorts the data shown in the average age chart.
The issue was already resolved for a long time. Reopening it and setting a new resolution made it appear that it was unresolved all the time, although it was closed, just with another resolution. For us it would be better if the average chart would only take the first resolution date into account.
How could we handle issues that need to be reopened without distorting the average age chart? Is it possible to change the resolution without changing the resolution date?
Support Feedback
Perhaps there could be some additional settings to be implemented to set issues that have been more than 30 days should not count into the Average Age Chart.
- is related to
-
JRASERVER-34157 accuracy of average age chart gadget is affected when there is old dated issue being reopened that change the resolution
- Gathering Interest
Hi everyone,
Thank you for bringing this suggestion to our attention. As explained in our new feature policy, there are many factors that influence our product roadmaps and determine the features we implement. When making decisions about what to prioritise and work on, we combine your feedback and suggestions with insights from our support teams, product analytics, research findings, and more. This information, combined with our medium- and long-term product and platform vision, determines what we implement and its priority order.
Unfortunately, as a result of inactivity for an extended period of time, this suggestion didn’t make it to the roadmap and we are closing it.
While this issue has been closed, our Product Managers continue to look at requests on jira.atlassian.com as they develop their roadmap, including closed ones. In addition, if you feel like this suggestion is still important to your team please let us know by commenting on this ticket.
Thank you again for providing valuable feedback to our team - Jira Cloud Product Management