-
Suggestion
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
128
-
HideAtlassian Update – 30 October 2024
Hi everyone,
Sorry for the radio silence, but good things still happened, here to share with you:
- We committed and delivered on the dependency for JSM Approvals - Group Pickers, yay
- Also, Automation platform experiences a couple of months ago
You should now be able to rename groups that have those dependencies and not break those experiences, if that isn't the case, please contact us at our support.atlassian.com channel.
Bonus: Last time I mentioned we would deliver group renames to customers that are not yet in the new administration experience, that is done! We are working internally to update ID-8234 that was created to track that impact and helped us commit to doing it!
As always, thank you & we've never been so close!
RODRIGO BECKER
Product Lead, Atlassian Guard
ShowAtlassian Update – 30 October 2024 Hi everyone, Sorry for the radio silence, but good things still happened, here to share with you: We committed and delivered on the dependency for JSM Approvals - Group Pickers , yay Also, Automation platform experiences a couple of months ago You should now be able to rename groups that have those dependencies and not break those experiences, if that isn't the case, please contact us at our support.atlassian.com channel. Bonus: Last time I mentioned we would deliver group renames to customers that are not yet in the new administration experience, that is done! We are working internally to update ID-8234 that was created to track that impact and helped us commit to doing it! As always, thank you & we've never been so close! RODRIGO BECKER Product Lead, Atlassian Guard -
Our product teams collect and evaluate feedback from a number of different sources. To learn more about how we use customer feedback in the planning process, check out our new feature policy.
Hi everyone,
We've launched the feature to rename groups in Atlassian Cloud, as per ID-6677.
As we informed in the above suggestion ticket, we decided to launch the feature in its earlier stages, as we know it can already benefit many of our customers, and, continue to work on the remaining dependencies, prioritizing the most impactful to the least, based on our usability analytics research.
On this ticket, we will track each dependency, to give you full visibility of what the work looks like, and what we are doing. The purpose of this ticket is not to gather impact, or prioritize work, the group rename feature is already a priority for Atlassian, and critical part of our roadmap.
Id | Depedency | Status |
---|---|---|
1 | Product Access | Done |
2 | Global permission | Done |
3 | Advanced Roadmaps - Plugin Permissions | Done |
4 | Project Roles | Done |
5 | Notification | Done |
6 | Issue Securities Scheme | Done |
7 | Share Permission | Done |
8 | JQL Filters - Subscription | Done |
9 | Permissions Scheme | Done |
10 | Advanced Roadmaps - Plan | Done |
11 | Workflows | Done |
12 | Announcements | Deprecated |
13 | Issue Comments | Done |
14 | User Picker Filter | Done |
15 | Board Administrators | Done |
16 | Worklogs | Done |
17 | Group Pickers - Custom Fields | Done |
18 | JSM Assets | In progress |
19 | JSM Approvals - Group Pickers | Done |
20 | Automation platform experiences | Done |
JQL Filter - Results are out of scope due to complexity in being a string that would need to change per JQL in the database, meanwhile, we know it's difficult to identify the blocking JQL, please use the workaround available in ID-8534.
Looking for user provisioning via SCIM group rename? Once all dependencies are fixed, we should start work on ACCESS-800.
Thank you!
RODRIGO BECKER
Product Lead, Atlassian Access
- blocks
-
ACCESS-800 Ability to rename groups after they've synced to the organization from an identity provider.
- In Progress
- is related to
-
JRACLOUD-83598 Announcements dependency for Group rename
-
- Closed
-
-
CONFCLOUD-80746 Reflect group name changes to the setting of Restricted Pages
- Gathering Interest
- mentioned in
-
Page Failed to load
-
Page Failed to load
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
[ID-8092] Group Rename dependencies tracking
Hi everyone,
Sorry for the radio silence, but good things still happened, here to share with you:
- We committed and delivered on the dependency for JSM Approvals - Group Pickers, yay
- Also, Automation platform experiences a couple of months ago
You should now be able to rename groups that have those dependencies and not break those experiences, if that isn't the case, please contact us at our support.atlassian.com channel.
Bonus: Last time I mentioned we would deliver group renames to customers that are not yet in the new administration experience, that is done! We are working internally to update ID-8234 that was created to track that impact and helped us commit to doing it!
As always, thank you & we've never been so close!
RODRIGO BECKER
Product Lead, Atlassian Guard
All comments
Just so I understand, rbecker, work on https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/ACCESS-800 won't start until this is completed?
So we are still looking for roughly another year or so until we can rename IdP synced groups?
Hi 59886a7e4545,
I checked in with the team, JSM Assets is in progress but estimated delivery date is Q2 2025 at the moment, the work was not trivial as they needed to do a re-architecture of the service which is still in progress, I will update this ticket and get back here if anything changes!
Thanks for the nudge,
RODRIGO BECKER
Product Lead, Atlassian Access
Hi rbecker
Thanks a lot for the update. Glad to hear that 19 and 20 haven been done!
Any news on 18? Just a rough ETA, we'll add another 1-2 month ourselves
Hi everyone,
Sorry for the radio silence, but good things still happened, here to share with you:
- We committed and delivered on the dependency for JSM Approvals - Group Pickers, yay
- Also, Automation platform experiences a couple of months ago
You should now be able to rename groups that have those dependencies and not break those experiences, if that isn't the case, please contact us at our support.atlassian.com channel.
Bonus: Last time I mentioned we would deliver group renames to customers that are not yet in the new administration experience, that is done! We are working internally to update ID-8234 that was created to track that impact and helped us commit to doing it!
As always, thank you & we've never been so close!
RODRIGO BECKER
Product Lead, Atlassian Guard
Hi 3870977af899 & 59886a7e4545,
That Automation platform experiences dependency was delivered a month after the original estimated date, end of August, thanks for the nudge here, I am updating the ticket to reflect that, in case you still see any issues, please contact our support on support.atlassian.com.
Thank you for your patience!
RODRIGO BECKER
Product Lead, Atlassian Access
Hi 6c265266a838,
I know it's been a while, but I hope that you managed to get help from our support to clean up any references from JSM Assets that blocked you from renaming the group, if not, don't hesitate on asking for our help on support.atlassian.com.
Thank you,
RODRIGO BECKER
Product Lead, Atlassian Access
Hi rbecker ,
any updates when 20 will be delivered?
I need to update group names very soon and those not being updated automatically in the automations will lead to quite a few issues.
Thanks,
Jana
Hi rbecker
20 should have been delivered by EoM July, it's September now and no update on the matter.
When can we expect 20 to be done, 18 and 19 to be (a) started and (b) resolved?
When you get to JSM Assets, please take into account if you don't have JSM premium (and so not using assets). I've tried to rename a group we use in our JSM. We are not running premium and so don't have access to assets, but won't let me rename it as I first have to remove it from the CMDB - Assets setting. When I click on this link, I get the try premium for free window (https://alayacare.atlassian.net/jira/servicedesk/assets)
Hi rbecker,
Thanks for the updates.
I would appreciate it if you could provide an update/ETA on the "JSM Assets" dependency in your next update.
We changed the site name and are unable to rename our JSM user group, which still references the old name due to this dependency. Is there a workaround for renaming a group that has a dependency on "CMDB—Asset"? I manually looked through the asset configurations but could not find any reference to the group.
Thanks,
Milad
rbecker
Good news would be if you get the whole functionality finally really fixed!
It took you almost 20 years to deliver ID-6677 Renaming groups after creation. - Create and track feature requests for Atlassian products. at least as a Beta, what is it now for more than one year without any further progress.
The missing functionality for assets is already known since 15/03/2023 according to Atlassian organization admins can now rename groups in cloud.
So I'm curious if it will really be delivered without any further bugs with July and even how much years it will take to fix the other open points?
This is FINALLY available in our instance!
Navigate to Atlassian Administration > Directory > Groups > [Group]
There is a new option under the ... (ellipsis) menu to Edit Group Name.
If the group is associated with any Jira queries/items, you will get a notification that the group name cannot be changed.
Hello everyone,
Passing by again, with a bit of delay to share the most recent updates to this ticket!
We've completed and deployed the following dependencies:
- Issue Comments
- Worklogs
- Group Pickers - Custom Fields
And added a new dependency:
- JSM Approvals - Group Pickers
As you can see, Jira related dependencies committed have been delivered, and we are now looking at JSM, which is currently paused until our team begins work on the dependencies, once this resumes, I will get back on this ticket with an update, but currently there is no ETA.
Thank you for your patience so far! As for those still in the old administration experience, we should begin notifying and migrating more customers in the upcoming weeks!
RODRIGO BECKER
Product Lead, Atlassian Access
Hi fd18b389d3c8,
Thanks to the great contributions of fdd9d54b8b81 and dec7a92259f7, you have a few options, our support is always happy to assist in such cases as we know they are pain points and limitations in our product, but feel free to implement your own solution as well!
Thank you,
RODRIGO BECKER
Product Lead, Atlassian Access
Hello David,
Recently I ran into the same problem and found some JQL in the filters contained the function "membersOf". I wrote a python script against the Jira API to search for the text "membersOf" in the JQL.
API: rest/api/3/filter/search?expand=jql
A simple search (e.g. Ctrl + F) through the results, should show you which filters you need to adjust.
Hello Rodrigo,
Thank you for the update!
Unfortunately, I have the same problem as Thomas. Cannot rename the group cause it's used in the JQL filters.
It's really hard to find which filters are used by the group when the lists contain hundreds of filters.
Thank you Rodrigo for your feedback - Although solving dependencies in the JQL filters and JSD serieses doesn't work automatically when renaming, we could solve the dependency issue with the help of the Atlassian Support. We simply asked which filters and serieses were blocking the group rename and could resolve them manually. Finding the 3 problematic filters out of the 1000+ filters on our instance would've taken a lot of time manually without the help of the support. Just as an information in case anybody runs into the same problems we ran into.
Hi 45b95255591e, fd18b389d3c8 and be6df64da5ff,
You are right to have noted that this ticket only includes Jira dependencies, the reason for that is because Confluence dependencies were already resolved in 2022, if you are facing issues in Confluence after renaming a group, please raise a support ticket to our team so we can validate the problem.
Thank you for reporting any issues here as well.
RODRIGO BECKER
Product Lead, Atlassian Access
Hi fdd9d54b8b81,
Thanks for bringing your question again, apologize for missing it earlier.
Experiences related to the JQL themselves are considered unaddressable at this time, as they are purely strings on our product's database, switching the group name for the ID would cause confusion for end users, also, the level of complexity and risk to perform a widespread string replacement to all databases was evaluated and ruled out.
We don't have plans on our roadmap to address the JQL engine now, but I will keep an eye on this once we ship all dependencies in scope.
I know this isn't the answer you were looking for, but we always want to give as much transparency as we can into giving realistic expectations.
Thank you & keep contributing to this ticket!
RODRIGO BECKER
Product Lead, Atlassian Access
I also had questions about how Confluence will work with this. For what it's worth, I did the following test and it worked fine:
- created a test group
- added the test group to a space's permissions and a page's permissions
- renamed the group
- verified that it updated in both the space and page's permissions and it did (after a couple of min)
So it seems to me that it is working with Confluence as well.
I have the same question as Dirk - what about Confluence dependencies? Lost page restrictions based on groups are almost impossible to restore.
This all looks like Jira stuff. What about usage in confluence (spaces and page restrictions!). The wasted page restrictions because of rename a group is really a hell to fix...
Hi,
asking again as I got no reply on my last comment; is there an intention to allow group renaming if there are dependencies in JQL Filter results and JSD serieses? If not, is there another ticket that we can vote for? See screenshot below
Hello,
This is your December update! With good and bad news, unfortunately.
Good news first – We are shipping the unblocking of the Issue Security Scheme experience and have the Worklogs experience still on track for end of December.
Bad news – Experiences such as Issue Comments Visibility and Group Picker - Custom Fields have been postponed to February, 2024, and JSM Assets has been put on pause due to internal team constraints, discussions to be resumed should happen early next year.
Neutral news – Since we deprecated the Announcements feature in the product, we will not address it anymore.
I will be sending out another update end of January or early February, 2024!
As always, thank you & Happy New Year!
RODRIGO BECKER
Product Lead, Atlassian Access
Hi,
will Dependencies of type "JSD - Series" and "JQL Filters - Result" also be solved automatically when the ticket is done? I could not find these entries in the table above.
Hi 9f4ac742e4d6,
We are on track for December to deliver all dependencies, the group rename feature is one of the main blockers to migrate our customers to the new administration experience (Where group rename exists), but the delivery date to migrate all customers is uncertain, given that there are other dependencies in place, but our hopes are to have everyone in the new administration experience by end of March, 2023 2024, at the moment, though we should slowly migrate customers until that date as it becomes possible.
I hope this gives clarity to your question!
RODRIGO BECKER
Product Lead, Atlassian Access
Hi everyone,
Sorry for the delay here, update was ready but we wanted to wait to share the recent releases:
- We've launched support for Workflows
- Advanced Roadmaps - Plan permissions support launched as well
- Along with Board Administrators
Also, JSM Assets was added in scope and is in progress as well.
You should be able to rename groups that are being used in these dependencies from now on, in case you face any issues, don't hesitate to contact us on support.atlassian.com, alright?
As for overall progress, we are still on track for December. See you then, hopefully with all your Christmas presents from this ticket!
Thank you,
RODRIGO BECKER
Product Lead, Atlassian Access
Hello d8d00dff5256,
Thanks for bringing this issue forth!
Would you mind raising a support request about it on https://support.atlassian.com/contact/? If there is an inconsistency with our dependency checks, we will need to diagnose it to understand how we can fix it for you and others, if you already did that, thank you again!
RODRIGO BECKER
Product Lead, Atlassian Access
Hey Rodrigo (I cannot at-mention you here?) .... the rename is NOT WORKING against Workflows I'm afraid.
I'm trying to rename a key group we've had since Server .... and hitting rename group told me that some Filters contained the group, and some Workflows also did.
I've fixed the Filters, and can see they are no longer reported as containing the group, however I cannot fix the Workflows.
I've exported all Workflows as XML, then searched using a multi-file text editor, and fixed two occurences of the group and saved the Workflows.
I've then tried to rename the group again - but failing every time on Workflows, despite it not being present.
Hey everyone,
Following up from our last update, the dependency for Permission schemes was to be shipped soon, I am happy to announce that it has been finished and shipped to production!
Thank you for your patience,
RODRIGO BECKER
Product Lead, Atlassian Access
So we're just continuing to ignore your Data Center customers that have been asking for this ability for 20 years? And that isn't an exaggeration.
JRASERVER-1391 has been open for 20 years.
Hi,
The long waited update is here as promised! (Apologies for the delay)
Great news, we are still on track, and here is what we've shipped and will ship soon:
- Share Permission – This relates to JQL filter shares, and dashboard access settings, so your dashboards should no longer be a problem for a group rename.
- Notifications – This one is about notification schemes, groups used in them will no longer be a blocker for group renames.
- [Soon to come] Permission Schemes – Another big win, the usage of groups in permission schemes shouldn't be a blocker anymore once shipped. Expectations are mid-end of July to be shipped.
Work started on:
- Issue Security Schemes
- Board Administrators
- Worklogs
As for 249cc3084ccd's concern below, thank you for flagging that, we are verifying internally and should update this ticket with the relevant details as well!
Hi. I just recently had this rolled out on our instance. I wonder why this isnt in another comment here but shouldn't automation item be added to the table here as per the last update on https://community.atlassian.com/t5/Atlassian-Access-articles/Org-admins-can-now-rename-groups-in-cloud/ba-p/2276321 - Looking forward to these updates. Thank you
Appreciate everyone's patience, if you face issues with dependencies that are currently Done, please raise a ticket with our support on support.atlassian.com!
Next update should go by the last week of October, based on the current expectations for remaining dependencies.
RODRIGO BECKER
Product Lead, Atlassian Access
Hi everyone,
Stay tuned as the update for this ticket will come out tomorrow, we are just verifying a few things before to ensure we are sharing as much as possible!
Thank you!
RODRIGO BECKER
Product Lead, Atlassian Access
Hi. I just recently had this rolled out on our instance. I wonder why this isnt in another comment here but shouldn't automation item be added to the table here as per the last update on https://community.atlassian.com/t5/Atlassian-Access-articles/Org-admins-can-now-rename-groups-in-cloud/ba-p/2276321 - Looking forward to these updates. Thank you
Any progress on this? I see the table was last updated in Mar 2023. Thank you
@Milad: When a group has a certain dependency that isn't resolved yet, then you'll see a popup listing those dependencies preventing you from renaming that group. So, you can't edit the group unless the dependency is fixed, or you manually remove that piece of configuration. Example: https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/ID-6677?focusedCommentId=3259371&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-3259371
@Rodrigo: I second Milad's comment, thanks for updates (and the dev team's work!) and following up from my linked comment, I can already rename some of the groups that were previously blocked, which is great!
Hi Rodrigo B.,
I want to say thanks and also appreciate the regular updates and your communication style regarding this piece of work.
May I know the actual impact of editing the group name while they are still dependencies in work? For example, what will happen (or what is not happening) regarding "Group Pickers - Custom Fields" if I edit a group name now? And are you going to eventually backtrack/fix those inconsistencies that occur during this period of time (till the end of June)? I searched the comments of this ticket and ID-6677, but could not find this info.
Kind regards,
Milad
Hi everyone,
We've been deciding which would be the best communications cadence for this ticket, moving forward.
Given that most of the ongoing work on the dependencies are estimated to end of June, we will set the date as being the last week of June for our next update here. In case we have any good or bad news in between, we should update you earlier.
Thank you & keep sending your questions here, and we will do our best effort to answer them!
RODRIGO BECKER
Product Lead, Atlassian Access
Hi ce2e2516fe3a,
Thanks for the question, I've updated this ticket's linked issues, as well as added a message regarding provisioned group renaming to the description of this ticket. The ticket to follow is ACCESS-800, and it is currently blocked by this one. We don't have updates for that one yet, as all relevant updates will be on this ticket, being the main blocker.
I hope that clarifies!
RODRIGO BECKER
Product Lead, Atlassian Access
Is this the ticket to watch for readiness of group renaming via provisioned groups (e.g. from Azure AD)?
Hi everyone,
Quick update, we had the dependency for Project Roles done, but it wasn't deployed to production yet, it should be done in the following days. Sorry for any trouble!
See ya!
RODRIGO BECKER
Product Lead, Atlassian Access
Hi 38f2f35e1866, this ticket does not address Server/DC sorry.
You'll still need to follow https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/JRASERVER-1391 for that
Thanks for this ticket and the details. Yeah, the visibilty is great and looking forward to all of this being rolled out. Thank you, Atlassian.
I love this visibility! I hope you guys do this for ALL the bugs/features tickets that are being worked on. This is really helpful! Great job!
Thank you!!
Hi 9f4060b22593,
Not exactly, most of the work for ACCESS-800 is already done, but we cannot deploy in production because of these dependencies that could cause a disconnect between IdP and the Atlassian cloud userbase.
My focus is on this ticket at the moment, but I will take a look at the other one again and get back on that ticket in a few weeks.
Thank you,
RODRIGO BECKER

Product Lead, Atlassian Access