Hi hboyce, thanks for providing this feedback. As you are probably aware, our password strength complexity is based on a measure of entropy, and not a defined set of particular values for certain measures. For this reason, there's no clear cut ruling that we can prescribe to users to set a password of a particular strength level. Users will need to use a combination of characters, words, symbols, mixed case etc in order to come up with a Very Strong password.
By 'give up', do you mean you have lowered the policy level to another value, and if so, which one?
If it helps you, this blog post provides a more technical background to the entropy library we have used: https://blogs.dropbox.com/tech/2012/04/zxcvbn-realistic-password-strength-estimation/; and this is a useful password strength test that helps you break down your password based on the entropy library used: https://apps.cygnius.net/passtest/
In the meantime, this is the current 'help' text we have with password creation. If you have any suggestions on how we could further make this text more helpful, given the above, that would be great to hear.

Hi James,
Appreciate the feedback. I'm not sure how to resolve the difficulties creating a Good password, we hoped the strength progress bar would allow users to experiment and find what constitutes Good. Unfortunately many users (especially those with non-technical backgrounds) intuitive idea of what a password should be, a single word with a letter and/or symbol after it, is not sufficiently strong that we could call it 'Good'.
However your issues with Weak seem unexpected, Weak is designed to allow any password at all! Could you expand on what problems you had then?