• Our product teams collect and evaluate feedback from a number of different sources. To learn more about how we use customer feedback in the planning process, check out our new feature policy.

      The suggestion is to allow setting include/exclude paths for a given repository using the FishEye REST API.

            [FE-5718] Allow setting include/exclude paths via REST API

            Atlassian Update – 10 January 2022

            Hi everyone,

            We have recently reviewed this issue and the overall interest in the problem. As the issue hasn't collect votes, watchers, comments, or support cases from many customers during its lifetime, it's very low on our priority list, and will not be fixed in the foreseeable future. That's why we've decided to resolve it as Not Being Considered.

            Although we're aware the issue is still important to those of you who were involved in the conversations around it, we want to be clear in managing your expectations. The Fisheye&Crucible team is focusing on issues that have broad impact and high value, reflected by the number of comments, votes, support cases, and customers interested. Please consult the Implementation of New Features Policy for more details.

            We understand how disappointing this decision may be, but we hope you'll appreciate our transparent approach and communication. Atlassian will continue to watch this issue for further updates, so please feel free to share your thoughts in the comments.

            Kind regards
            Marek Parfianowicz
            Development Team Lead

            Marek Parfianowicz added a comment - Atlassian Update – 10 January 2022 Hi everyone, We have recently reviewed this issue and the overall interest in the problem. As the issue hasn't collect votes, watchers, comments, or support cases from many customers during its lifetime, it's very low on our priority list, and will not be fixed in the foreseeable future. That's why we've decided to resolve it as Not Being Considered . Although we're aware the issue is still important to those of you who were involved in the conversations around it, we want to be clear in managing your expectations. The Fisheye&Crucible team is focusing on issues that have broad impact and high value, reflected by the number of comments, votes, support cases, and customers interested. Please consult the Implementation of New Features Policy for more details. We understand how disappointing this decision may be, but we hope you'll appreciate our transparent approach and communication. Atlassian will continue to watch this issue for further updates, so please feel free to share your thoughts in the comments. Kind regards Marek Parfianowicz Development Team Lead

            Hi Francois, unfortunately this seems to be a low-priority issue with low users' interest, so it's not on our short-term development backlog currently.

            Marek Parfianowicz added a comment - Hi Francois, unfortunately this seems to be a low-priority issue with low users' interest, so it's not on our short-term development backlog currently.

            François added a comment -

            With p4 repositories the include/exclude paths are very valuable due to the lack of "workspace" support in fisheye/crucible.

            Adding this small feature to the REST API would be very important indeed. Will that happen any time soon?

            François added a comment - With p4 repositories the include/exclude paths are very valuable due to the lack of "workspace" support in fisheye/crucible. Adding this small feature to the REST API would be very important indeed. Will that happen any time soon?

              Unassigned Unassigned
              grefosco Gustavo Refosco (Inactive)
              Votes:
              5 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              6 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated: