Uploaded image for project: 'Crowd Data Center'
  1. Crowd Data Center
  2. CWD-4549

Allow second LDAP server to be listed in the LDAP connector for failover / redundancy

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Suggestion Suggestion
    • Resolution: Duplicate
    • None
    • Directory - LDAP
    • None

    • Our product teams collect and evaluate feedback from a number of different sources. To learn more about how we use customer feedback in the planning process, check out our new feature policy.

      It would be helpful to have a second / "Failover URL" entry (though not make it required) in the LDAP Connector screen on the Connector tab. This would allow for failover/redundancy in situations when the primary LDAP server goes down and the failover server is still operational and could also reduce maintenance complications when LDAP servers need to be upgraded or replaced.

            [CWD-4549] Allow second LDAP server to be listed in the LDAP connector for failover / redundancy

            Katherine Yabut made changes -
            Workflow Original: JAC Suggestion Workflow [ 3363063 ] New: JAC Suggestion Workflow 3 [ 3626674 ]
            Status Original: RESOLVED [ 5 ] New: Closed [ 6 ]
            Monique Khairuliana (Inactive) made changes -
            Workflow Original: Simplified Crowd Development Workflow v2 [ 1393566 ] New: JAC Suggestion Workflow [ 3363063 ]
            Issue Type Original: New Feature [ 2 ] New: Suggestion [ 10000 ]
            Owen made changes -
            Workflow Original: Crowd Development Workflow v2 [ 982792 ] New: Simplified Crowd Development Workflow v2 [ 1393566 ]

            joe added a comment -

            No problem; unfortunately, it's an old one. Thanks for reporting this. There's a workaround in there that may work for you.

            joe added a comment - No problem; unfortunately, it's an old one. Thanks for reporting this. There's a workaround in there that may work for you.

            Jim Bethancourt added a comment -

            Hi Joseph,
            Sorry for not realizing it was a duplicate – I've voted on it. Thanks for catching it and keep up the great work.

            Jim

            Jim Bethancourt added a comment - Hi Joseph, Sorry for not realizing it was a duplicate – I've voted on it. Thanks for catching it and keep up the great work. Jim
            joe made changes -
            Resolution New: Duplicate [ 3 ]
            Status Original: Open [ 1 ] New: Resolved [ 5 ]
            joe made changes -
            Link New: This issue duplicates CWD-422 [ CWD-422 ]
            Jim Bethancourt created issue -

              Unassigned Unassigned
              c3bc7a09ca60 Jim Bethancourt
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: