Uploaded image for project: 'Confluence Cloud'
  1. Confluence Cloud
  2. CONFCLOUD-1683

Allow space admins to see members of groups

XMLWordPrintable

    • 1

    • Our product teams collect and evaluate feedback from a number of different sources. To learn more about how we use customer feedback in the planning process, check out our new feature policy.

      NOTE: This suggestion is for Confluence Cloud. Using Confluence Server? See the corresponding suggestion.

      Space admins can assign permissions to groups, but can't actually see who belongs to those groups. Might be a useful thing to add.

            [CONFCLOUD-1683] Allow space admins to see members of groups

            Brian Collett added a comment -

            Having a list of who are members and another showing who are not will help tremendously to add missing members.
            If these are side by side, with a button to add selected missing users will also be good.

            Brian Collett added a comment - Having a list of who are members and another showing who are not will help tremendously to add missing members. If these are side by side, with a button to add selected missing users will also be good.

            Kelli Carlson added a comment -

            This would also be useful to anyone that has page restriction ability.

            Kelli Carlson added a comment - This would also be useful to anyone that has page restriction ability.

            Tom Mitchell added a comment -

            I agree this is a real gap. Having a mechanism by which I grant privileges to see stuff without being able to verify who has access is an awkward thing.

            Tom Mitchell added a comment - I agree this is a real gap. Having a mechanism by which I grant privileges to see stuff without being able to verify who has access is an awkward thing.

            Eric Friedman added a comment -

            This really should be fixed – allowing users to take security-related actions without letting them understand the scope of the effects is a Bad Thing.

            Eric Friedman added a comment - This really should be fixed – allowing users to take security-related actions without letting them understand the scope of the effects is a Bad Thing.

            GeoffreyC added a comment -

            Yes. In fact, better yet, keep the global group concept but allow an optional attribute of a group to specify a space to which it is related. This is a step towards a much sought after enhancement (from JHU's perspective) to Confluence for "user partitioning" or, better yet, distributed/delegated user management. I'd like to see some user management delegated to the space admin-level rather than the global admin level.

            GeoffreyC added a comment - Yes. In fact, better yet, keep the global group concept but allow an optional attribute of a group to specify a space to which it is related. This is a step towards a much sought after enhancement (from JHU's perspective) to Confluence for "user partitioning" or, better yet, distributed/delegated user management. I'd like to see some user management delegated to the space admin-level rather than the global admin level.

              Unassigned Unassigned
              cmiller@atlassian.com Charles Miller (Inactive)
              Votes:
              15 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              7 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated: